Cargando…

Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam

BACKGROUND: The prospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Electron beam or HDR 192Ir Interstitial Implant used as a boost in breast Conservation cases after completion of EBRT. The two therapeutic modalities were compared in terms of the following parameters; i.e. cosmesis, optimizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Sanjoy, Devleena, Maji, Tapas, Chaudhuri, Prabir, Lahiri, Debarshi, Biswas, Jaydip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604954
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125238
_version_ 1782304814581940224
author Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
author_facet Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
author_sort Roy, Sanjoy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Electron beam or HDR 192Ir Interstitial Implant used as a boost in breast Conservation cases after completion of EBRT. The two therapeutic modalities were compared in terms of the following parameters; i.e. cosmesis, optimization of tumor bed boost, local control, toxicity, and DFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EBRT dose used was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks time. Target delineation of boost treatment was done by CT scan or by high resolution USG. EBRT will be immediately followed by local boost at the primary tumor bearing site of breast with 8 to12 MeV electron beam to a dose of 15 Gy in 6 fractions (Arm A) or with HDR 192Ir interstitial brachytherapy to a dose of 15 Gy in 3 fractions at 6 hours apart (Arm B). RESULTS: The excellent cosmesis achieved with electron beam therapy in Arm A was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.025). Local relapse was absent in both the arms. One distant metastasis occurred in Arm A within 10 months of initiation of treatment and one distant metastasis in Arm B came out within 3 months of starting of therapy. CONCLUSION: The study has shown good cosmetic result with electron boost and 100% local control with both the technique. However if there is a more number of patients with longer period of follow up we could have got the actual picture to verify our results and assess long term survival data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3932592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39325922014-03-06 Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam Roy, Sanjoy Devleena, Maji, Tapas Chaudhuri, Prabir Lahiri, Debarshi Biswas, Jaydip Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The prospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Electron beam or HDR 192Ir Interstitial Implant used as a boost in breast Conservation cases after completion of EBRT. The two therapeutic modalities were compared in terms of the following parameters; i.e. cosmesis, optimization of tumor bed boost, local control, toxicity, and DFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EBRT dose used was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks time. Target delineation of boost treatment was done by CT scan or by high resolution USG. EBRT will be immediately followed by local boost at the primary tumor bearing site of breast with 8 to12 MeV electron beam to a dose of 15 Gy in 6 fractions (Arm A) or with HDR 192Ir interstitial brachytherapy to a dose of 15 Gy in 3 fractions at 6 hours apart (Arm B). RESULTS: The excellent cosmesis achieved with electron beam therapy in Arm A was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.025). Local relapse was absent in both the arms. One distant metastasis occurred in Arm A within 10 months of initiation of treatment and one distant metastasis in Arm B came out within 3 months of starting of therapy. CONCLUSION: The study has shown good cosmetic result with electron boost and 100% local control with both the technique. However if there is a more number of patients with longer period of follow up we could have got the actual picture to verify our results and assess long term survival data. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3932592/ /pubmed/24604954 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125238 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Roy, Sanjoy
Devleena,
Maji, Tapas
Chaudhuri, Prabir
Lahiri, Debarshi
Biswas, Jaydip
Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title_full Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title_fullStr Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title_full_unstemmed Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title_short Tumor bed boost in breast cancer: Brachytherapy versus electron beam
title_sort tumor bed boost in breast cancer: brachytherapy versus electron beam
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604954
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.125238
work_keys_str_mv AT roysanjoy tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam
AT devleena tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam
AT majitapas tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam
AT chaudhuriprabir tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam
AT lahiridebarshi tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam
AT biswasjaydip tumorbedboostinbreastcancerbrachytherapyversuselectronbeam