Cargando…

Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Colonization with MRSA is believed to have deteriorating effects on neurological rehabilitation patients because MRSA carriers need to be isolated. METHODS: Medical records of neurological early rehabilitation patients (most of them after stroke) admitted to a large rehabilitation facili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rollnik, Jens D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24555811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-34
_version_ 1782304835776806912
author Rollnik, Jens D
author_facet Rollnik, Jens D
author_sort Rollnik, Jens D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonization with MRSA is believed to have deteriorating effects on neurological rehabilitation patients because MRSA carriers need to be isolated. METHODS: Medical records of neurological early rehabilitation patients (most of them after stroke) admitted to a large rehabilitation facility in Northern Germany in 2010 have been carefully reviewed with respect to MRSA status, outcome variables (functional independence), morbidity, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: 74/569 (13.0%) patients were MRSA positive on admission. MRSA carriers had a significantly longer LOS in early neurological rehabilitation (63.7 (37.1) vs. 25.8 (24.5) days, p < 0.001), worse functional status on admission (Barthel index (BI) 13.6 (9.9) vs. 25.6 (24.1), p < 0.001), worse Glasgow Coma Scale (9.5 (3.2) vs. 12.0 (3.3), p < 0.001), more co-diagnoses (20.5 (5.1) vs. 13.3 (5.5), p < 0.001), and higher Patient Clinical Complexity Levels (PCCL). The outcome was significantly worse among MRSA positive patients (BI 25.5 (21.2) vs. 47.4 (31.0), p < 0.001; Early Rehabilitation Index −47.3 (51.4) vs. -26.0 (35.4), p < 0.001). Isolated patients had slightly less therapy per day (131.6 (16.6) vs. 140.2 (18.7) min/day, p < 0.001), but the overall sum of therapy was significantly larger in the MRSA positive group due to longer LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery of MRSA carriers in early neurological rehabilitation is worse than in MRSA negative patients. Poorer outcome is not resulting from isolation (less therapy) but from functional status and higher morbidity on admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3932788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39327882014-02-25 Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation Rollnik, Jens D BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colonization with MRSA is believed to have deteriorating effects on neurological rehabilitation patients because MRSA carriers need to be isolated. METHODS: Medical records of neurological early rehabilitation patients (most of them after stroke) admitted to a large rehabilitation facility in Northern Germany in 2010 have been carefully reviewed with respect to MRSA status, outcome variables (functional independence), morbidity, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: 74/569 (13.0%) patients were MRSA positive on admission. MRSA carriers had a significantly longer LOS in early neurological rehabilitation (63.7 (37.1) vs. 25.8 (24.5) days, p < 0.001), worse functional status on admission (Barthel index (BI) 13.6 (9.9) vs. 25.6 (24.1), p < 0.001), worse Glasgow Coma Scale (9.5 (3.2) vs. 12.0 (3.3), p < 0.001), more co-diagnoses (20.5 (5.1) vs. 13.3 (5.5), p < 0.001), and higher Patient Clinical Complexity Levels (PCCL). The outcome was significantly worse among MRSA positive patients (BI 25.5 (21.2) vs. 47.4 (31.0), p < 0.001; Early Rehabilitation Index −47.3 (51.4) vs. -26.0 (35.4), p < 0.001). Isolated patients had slightly less therapy per day (131.6 (16.6) vs. 140.2 (18.7) min/day, p < 0.001), but the overall sum of therapy was significantly larger in the MRSA positive group due to longer LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery of MRSA carriers in early neurological rehabilitation is worse than in MRSA negative patients. Poorer outcome is not resulting from isolation (less therapy) but from functional status and higher morbidity on admission. BioMed Central 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3932788/ /pubmed/24555811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-34 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rollnik; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rollnik, Jens D
Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title_full Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title_fullStr Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title_short Outcome of MRSA carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
title_sort outcome of mrsa carriers in neurological early rehabilitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24555811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-34
work_keys_str_mv AT rollnikjensd outcomeofmrsacarriersinneurologicalearlyrehabilitation