Cargando…

A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND: Delineation of the target volume is a time-consuming task in radiotherapy treatment planning, yet essential for a successful treatment of cancers such as prostate cancer. To facilitate the delineation procedure, the paper proposes an intuitive approach for 3D modeling of the prostate by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Jörn, Skrøvseth, Stein Olav, Tømmerås, Veronika Kristine, Marienhagen, Kirsten, Godtliebsen, Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-14-4
_version_ 1782304858667220992
author Schulz, Jörn
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Tømmerås, Veronika Kristine
Marienhagen, Kirsten
Godtliebsen, Fred
author_facet Schulz, Jörn
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Tømmerås, Veronika Kristine
Marienhagen, Kirsten
Godtliebsen, Fred
author_sort Schulz, Jörn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delineation of the target volume is a time-consuming task in radiotherapy treatment planning, yet essential for a successful treatment of cancers such as prostate cancer. To facilitate the delineation procedure, the paper proposes an intuitive approach for 3D modeling of the prostate by slice-wise best fitting ellipses. METHODS: The proposed estimate is initialized by the definition of a few control points in a new patient. The method is not restricted to particular image modalities but assumes a smooth shape with elliptic cross sections of the object. A training data set of 23 patients was used to calculate a prior shape model. The mean shape model was evaluated based on the manual contour of 10 test patients. The patient records of training and test data are based on axial T1-weighted 3D fast-field echo (FFE) sequences. The manual contours were considered as the reference model. Volume overlap (Vo), accuracy (Ac) (both ratio, range 0-1, optimal value 1) and Hausdorff distance (HD) (mm, optimal value 0) were calculated as evaluation parameters. RESULTS: The median and median absolute deviation (MAD) between manual delineation and deformed mean best fitting ellipses (MBFE) was Vo (0.9 ± 0.02), Ac (0.81 ± 0.03) and HD (4.05 ± 1.3)mm and between manual delineation and best fitting ellipses (BFE) was Vo (0.96 ± 0.01), Ac (0.92 ± 0.01) and HD (1.6 ± 0.27)mm. Additional results show a moderate improvement of the MBFE results after Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) method. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize the potential of the proposed method of modeling the prostate by best fitting ellipses. It shows the robustness and reproducibility of the model. A small sample test on 8 patients suggest possible time saving using the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39330102014-03-06 A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning Schulz, Jörn Skrøvseth, Stein Olav Tømmerås, Veronika Kristine Marienhagen, Kirsten Godtliebsen, Fred BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Delineation of the target volume is a time-consuming task in radiotherapy treatment planning, yet essential for a successful treatment of cancers such as prostate cancer. To facilitate the delineation procedure, the paper proposes an intuitive approach for 3D modeling of the prostate by slice-wise best fitting ellipses. METHODS: The proposed estimate is initialized by the definition of a few control points in a new patient. The method is not restricted to particular image modalities but assumes a smooth shape with elliptic cross sections of the object. A training data set of 23 patients was used to calculate a prior shape model. The mean shape model was evaluated based on the manual contour of 10 test patients. The patient records of training and test data are based on axial T1-weighted 3D fast-field echo (FFE) sequences. The manual contours were considered as the reference model. Volume overlap (Vo), accuracy (Ac) (both ratio, range 0-1, optimal value 1) and Hausdorff distance (HD) (mm, optimal value 0) were calculated as evaluation parameters. RESULTS: The median and median absolute deviation (MAD) between manual delineation and deformed mean best fitting ellipses (MBFE) was Vo (0.9 ± 0.02), Ac (0.81 ± 0.03) and HD (4.05 ± 1.3)mm and between manual delineation and best fitting ellipses (BFE) was Vo (0.96 ± 0.01), Ac (0.92 ± 0.01) and HD (1.6 ± 0.27)mm. Additional results show a moderate improvement of the MBFE results after Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) method. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize the potential of the proposed method of modeling the prostate by best fitting ellipses. It shows the robustness and reproducibility of the model. A small sample test on 8 patients suggest possible time saving using the model. BioMed Central 2014-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3933010/ /pubmed/24460666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-14-4 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schulz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schulz, Jörn
Skrøvseth, Stein Olav
Tømmerås, Veronika Kristine
Marienhagen, Kirsten
Godtliebsen, Fred
A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title_fullStr A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title_short A semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
title_sort semiautomatic tool for prostate segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-14-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzjorn asemiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT skrøvsethsteinolav asemiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT tømmerasveronikakristine asemiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT marienhagenkirsten asemiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT godtliebsenfred asemiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT schulzjorn semiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT skrøvsethsteinolav semiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT tømmerasveronikakristine semiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT marienhagenkirsten semiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning
AT godtliebsenfred semiautomatictoolforprostatesegmentationinradiotherapytreatmentplanning