Cargando…
Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575137 |
_version_ | 1782304865757691904 |
---|---|
author | Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza Nabavi, Salaheddin Haghjoo, Majid Toutonchi, Zia Mirmesdagh, Yalda Javadikasgari, Hoda |
author_facet | Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza Nabavi, Salaheddin Haghjoo, Majid Toutonchi, Zia Mirmesdagh, Yalda Javadikasgari, Hoda |
author_sort | Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit three minutes before aortic cross clamp release and compare the results with normal saline as placebo in a randomized double blinded controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients scheduled for first time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive either single dose of amiodarone (150 mg), lidocaine (100 mg), or normal saline (5 ml) three minutes before aortic cross clamp release. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation and the need for reuse of drug were compared between these groups by chi-square, Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and One-way ANOVA. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ventricular fibrillation is higher in the placebo group (15.9%) compare to lidocaine (11.8%) and amiodarone (8.9%) groups; however, there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.41). Moreover, the reuse of amiodarone (22.7%) was statistically higher (P < 0.05) than lidocaine (5.9%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference among lidocaine, amiodarone, and placebo in preventing ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp release. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3933055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39330552014-02-26 Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza Nabavi, Salaheddin Haghjoo, Majid Toutonchi, Zia Mirmesdagh, Yalda Javadikasgari, Hoda ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit three minutes before aortic cross clamp release and compare the results with normal saline as placebo in a randomized double blinded controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients scheduled for first time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive either single dose of amiodarone (150 mg), lidocaine (100 mg), or normal saline (5 ml) three minutes before aortic cross clamp release. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation and the need for reuse of drug were compared between these groups by chi-square, Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and One-way ANOVA. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ventricular fibrillation is higher in the placebo group (15.9%) compare to lidocaine (11.8%) and amiodarone (8.9%) groups; however, there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.41). Moreover, the reuse of amiodarone (22.7%) was statistically higher (P < 0.05) than lidocaine (5.9%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference among lidocaine, amiodarone, and placebo in preventing ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp release. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3933055/ /pubmed/24575137 Text en © 2013 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza Nabavi, Salaheddin Haghjoo, Majid Toutonchi, Zia Mirmesdagh, Yalda Javadikasgari, Hoda Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title | Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alizadehghavidelalireza amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT nabavisalaheddin amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT haghjoomajid amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT toutonchizia amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT mirmesdaghyalda amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT javadikasgarihoda amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial |