Cargando…

Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza, Nabavi, Salaheddin, Haghjoo, Majid, Toutonchi, Zia, Mirmesdagh, Yalda, Javadikasgari, Hoda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575137
_version_ 1782304865757691904
author Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza
Nabavi, Salaheddin
Haghjoo, Majid
Toutonchi, Zia
Mirmesdagh, Yalda
Javadikasgari, Hoda
author_facet Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza
Nabavi, Salaheddin
Haghjoo, Majid
Toutonchi, Zia
Mirmesdagh, Yalda
Javadikasgari, Hoda
author_sort Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit three minutes before aortic cross clamp release and compare the results with normal saline as placebo in a randomized double blinded controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients scheduled for first time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive either single dose of amiodarone (150 mg), lidocaine (100 mg), or normal saline (5 ml) three minutes before aortic cross clamp release. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation and the need for reuse of drug were compared between these groups by chi-square, Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and One-way ANOVA. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ventricular fibrillation is higher in the placebo group (15.9%) compare to lidocaine (11.8%) and amiodarone (8.9%) groups; however, there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.41). Moreover, the reuse of amiodarone (22.7%) was statistically higher (P < 0.05) than lidocaine (5.9%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference among lidocaine, amiodarone, and placebo in preventing ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp release.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39330552014-02-26 Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza Nabavi, Salaheddin Haghjoo, Majid Toutonchi, Zia Mirmesdagh, Yalda Javadikasgari, Hoda ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: Reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp is one of the important complications of open cardiac surgery and its prevention could reduce myocardial injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single dose of amiodarone or lidocaine by the way of pump circuit three minutes before aortic cross clamp release and compare the results with normal saline as placebo in a randomized double blinded controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients scheduled for first time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive either single dose of amiodarone (150 mg), lidocaine (100 mg), or normal saline (5 ml) three minutes before aortic cross clamp release. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation and the need for reuse of drug were compared between these groups by chi-square, Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and One-way ANOVA. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of ventricular fibrillation is higher in the placebo group (15.9%) compare to lidocaine (11.8%) and amiodarone (8.9%) groups; however, there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.41). Moreover, the reuse of amiodarone (22.7%) was statistically higher (P < 0.05) than lidocaine (5.9%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference among lidocaine, amiodarone, and placebo in preventing ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross clamp release. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3933055/ /pubmed/24575137 Text en © 2013 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alizadeh-Ghavidel, Alireza
Nabavi, Salaheddin
Haghjoo, Majid
Toutonchi, Zia
Mirmesdagh, Yalda
Javadikasgari, Hoda
Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort amiodarone versus lidocaine for the prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575137
work_keys_str_mv AT alizadehghavidelalireza amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nabavisalaheddin amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT haghjoomajid amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT toutonchizia amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mirmesdaghyalda amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT javadikasgarihoda amiodaroneversuslidocaineforthepreventionofreperfusionventricularfibrillationarandomizedclinicaltrial