Cargando…

Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?

BACKGROUND: Most randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing a new health service do not allow a run-in period of consolidation before evaluating the new approach. Consequently, health professionals involved may feel insufficiently familiar or confident, or that new processes or systems that are integ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rathod, Trishna, Belcher, John, Montgomery, Alan A, Salisbury, Chris, Foster, Nadine E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-41
_version_ 1782304922960658432
author Rathod, Trishna
Belcher, John
Montgomery, Alan A
Salisbury, Chris
Foster, Nadine E
author_facet Rathod, Trishna
Belcher, John
Montgomery, Alan A
Salisbury, Chris
Foster, Nadine E
author_sort Rathod, Trishna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing a new health service do not allow a run-in period of consolidation before evaluating the new approach. Consequently, health professionals involved may feel insufficiently familiar or confident, or that new processes or systems that are integral to the service are insufficiently embedded in routine care prior to definitive evaluation in a RCT. This study aimed to determine the optimal run-in period for a new physiotherapy-led telephone assessment and treatment service known as PhysioDirect and whether a run-in was needed prior to evaluating outcomes in an RCT. METHODS: The PhysioDirect trial assessed whether PhysioDirect was as effective as usual care. Prior to the main trial, a run-in of up to 12 weeks was permitted to facilitate physiotherapists to become confident in delivering the new service. Outcomes collected from the run-in and main trial were length of telephone calls within the PhysioDirect service and patients’ physical function (SF-36v2 questionnaire) and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile v2 collected at baseline and six months. Joinpoint regression determined how long it had taken call times to stabilise. Analysis of covariance determined whether patients’ physical function at six months changed from the run-in to the main trial. RESULTS: Mean PhysioDirect call times (minutes) were higher in the run-in (31 (SD: 12.6)) than in the main trial (25 (SD: 11.6)). Each physiotherapist needed to answer 42 (95% CI: 20,56) calls for their mean call time to stabilise at 25 minutes per call; this took a minimum of seven weeks. For patients’ physical function, PhysioDirect was equally clinically effective as usual care during both the run-in (0.17 (95% CI: -0.91,1.24)) and main trial (-0.01 (95% CI: -0.80,0.79)). CONCLUSIONS: A run-in was not needed in a large trial testing PhysioDirect services in terms of patient outcomes. A learning curve was evident in the process measure of telephone call length. This decreased during the run-in and stabilised prior to commencement of the main trial. Future trials should build in a run-in if it is anticipated that learning would have an effect on patient outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN55666618
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39333712014-02-25 Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials? Rathod, Trishna Belcher, John Montgomery, Alan A Salisbury, Chris Foster, Nadine E Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Most randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing a new health service do not allow a run-in period of consolidation before evaluating the new approach. Consequently, health professionals involved may feel insufficiently familiar or confident, or that new processes or systems that are integral to the service are insufficiently embedded in routine care prior to definitive evaluation in a RCT. This study aimed to determine the optimal run-in period for a new physiotherapy-led telephone assessment and treatment service known as PhysioDirect and whether a run-in was needed prior to evaluating outcomes in an RCT. METHODS: The PhysioDirect trial assessed whether PhysioDirect was as effective as usual care. Prior to the main trial, a run-in of up to 12 weeks was permitted to facilitate physiotherapists to become confident in delivering the new service. Outcomes collected from the run-in and main trial were length of telephone calls within the PhysioDirect service and patients’ physical function (SF-36v2 questionnaire) and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile v2 collected at baseline and six months. Joinpoint regression determined how long it had taken call times to stabilise. Analysis of covariance determined whether patients’ physical function at six months changed from the run-in to the main trial. RESULTS: Mean PhysioDirect call times (minutes) were higher in the run-in (31 (SD: 12.6)) than in the main trial (25 (SD: 11.6)). Each physiotherapist needed to answer 42 (95% CI: 20,56) calls for their mean call time to stabilise at 25 minutes per call; this took a minimum of seven weeks. For patients’ physical function, PhysioDirect was equally clinically effective as usual care during both the run-in (0.17 (95% CI: -0.91,1.24)) and main trial (-0.01 (95% CI: -0.80,0.79)). CONCLUSIONS: A run-in was not needed in a large trial testing PhysioDirect services in terms of patient outcomes. A learning curve was evident in the process measure of telephone call length. This decreased during the run-in and stabilised prior to commencement of the main trial. Future trials should build in a run-in if it is anticipated that learning would have an effect on patient outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN55666618 BioMed Central 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3933371/ /pubmed/24479729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-41 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rathod et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Rathod, Trishna
Belcher, John
Montgomery, Alan A
Salisbury, Chris
Foster, Nadine E
Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title_full Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title_fullStr Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title_full_unstemmed Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title_short Health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
title_sort health services changes: is a run-in period necessary before evaluation in randomised clinical trials?
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-41
work_keys_str_mv AT rathodtrishna healthserviceschangesisaruninperiodnecessarybeforeevaluationinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT belcherjohn healthserviceschangesisaruninperiodnecessarybeforeevaluationinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT montgomeryalana healthserviceschangesisaruninperiodnecessarybeforeevaluationinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT salisburychris healthserviceschangesisaruninperiodnecessarybeforeevaluationinrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT fosternadinee healthserviceschangesisaruninperiodnecessarybeforeevaluationinrandomisedclinicaltrials