Cargando…

The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability

BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the Germa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gräff, Ingo, Goldschmidt, Bernd, Glien, Procula, Bogdanow, Manuela, Fimmers, Rolf, Hoeft, Andreas, Kim, Se-Chan, Grigutsch, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995
_version_ 1782304932785815552
author Gräff, Ingo
Goldschmidt, Bernd
Glien, Procula
Bogdanow, Manuela
Fimmers, Rolf
Hoeft, Andreas
Kim, Se-Chan
Grigutsch, Daniel
author_facet Gräff, Ingo
Goldschmidt, Bernd
Glien, Procula
Bogdanow, Manuela
Fimmers, Rolf
Hoeft, Andreas
Kim, Se-Chan
Grigutsch, Daniel
author_sort Gräff, Ingo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ(2) Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39334242014-02-25 The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability Gräff, Ingo Goldschmidt, Bernd Glien, Procula Bogdanow, Manuela Fimmers, Rolf Hoeft, Andreas Kim, Se-Chan Grigutsch, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ(2) Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department. Public Library of Science 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3933424/ /pubmed/24586477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995 Text en © 2014 Gräff et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gräff, Ingo
Goldschmidt, Bernd
Glien, Procula
Bogdanow, Manuela
Fimmers, Rolf
Hoeft, Andreas
Kim, Se-Chan
Grigutsch, Daniel
The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title_full The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title_fullStr The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title_full_unstemmed The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title_short The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
title_sort german version of the manchester triage system and its quality criteria – first assessment of validity and reliability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995
work_keys_str_mv AT graffingo thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT goldschmidtbernd thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT glienprocula thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT bogdanowmanuela thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT fimmersrolf thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT hoeftandreas thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT kimsechan thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT grigutschdaniel thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT graffingo germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT goldschmidtbernd germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT glienprocula germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT bogdanowmanuela germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT fimmersrolf germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT hoeftandreas germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT kimsechan germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability
AT grigutschdaniel germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability