Cargando…
The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability
BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the Germa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995 |
_version_ | 1782304932785815552 |
---|---|
author | Gräff, Ingo Goldschmidt, Bernd Glien, Procula Bogdanow, Manuela Fimmers, Rolf Hoeft, Andreas Kim, Se-Chan Grigutsch, Daniel |
author_facet | Gräff, Ingo Goldschmidt, Bernd Glien, Procula Bogdanow, Manuela Fimmers, Rolf Hoeft, Andreas Kim, Se-Chan Grigutsch, Daniel |
author_sort | Gräff, Ingo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ(2) Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3933424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39334242014-02-25 The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability Gräff, Ingo Goldschmidt, Bernd Glien, Procula Bogdanow, Manuela Fimmers, Rolf Hoeft, Andreas Kim, Se-Chan Grigutsch, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ(2) Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department. Public Library of Science 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3933424/ /pubmed/24586477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995 Text en © 2014 Gräff et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gräff, Ingo Goldschmidt, Bernd Glien, Procula Bogdanow, Manuela Fimmers, Rolf Hoeft, Andreas Kim, Se-Chan Grigutsch, Daniel The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title | The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title_full | The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title_fullStr | The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title_short | The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and Its Quality Criteria – First Assessment of Validity and Reliability |
title_sort | german version of the manchester triage system and its quality criteria – first assessment of validity and reliability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graffingo thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT goldschmidtbernd thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT glienprocula thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT bogdanowmanuela thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT fimmersrolf thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT hoeftandreas thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT kimsechan thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT grigutschdaniel thegermanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT graffingo germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT goldschmidtbernd germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT glienprocula germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT bogdanowmanuela germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT fimmersrolf germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT hoeftandreas germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT kimsechan germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability AT grigutschdaniel germanversionofthemanchestertriagesystemanditsqualitycriteriafirstassessmentofvalidityandreliability |