Cargando…
An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807 |
_version_ | 1782304969133654016 |
---|---|
author | Lindenmayer, David B. Barton, Philip S. Lane, Peter W. Westgate, Martin J. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Gibbons, Philip Likens, Gene E. |
author_facet | Lindenmayer, David B. Barton, Philip S. Lane, Peter W. Westgate, Martin J. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Gibbons, Philip Likens, Gene E. |
author_sort | Lindenmayer, David B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3933686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39336862014-02-25 An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees Lindenmayer, David B. Barton, Philip S. Lane, Peter W. Westgate, Martin J. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Gibbons, Philip Likens, Gene E. PLoS One Research Article A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior. Public Library of Science 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3933686/ /pubmed/24587050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807 Text en © 2014 Lindenmayer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lindenmayer, David B. Barton, Philip S. Lane, Peter W. Westgate, Martin J. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Gibbons, Philip Likens, Gene E. An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title | An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title_full | An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title_fullStr | An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title_full_unstemmed | An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title_short | An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees |
title_sort | empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindenmayerdavidb anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT bartonphilips anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT lanepeterw anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT westgatemartinj anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT mcburneylachlan anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT blairdavid anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT gibbonsphilip anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT likensgenee anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT lindenmayerdavidb empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT bartonphilips empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT lanepeterw empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT westgatemartinj empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT mcburneylachlan empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT blairdavid empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT gibbonsphilip empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees AT likensgenee empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees |