Cargando…

An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees

A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindenmayer, David B., Barton, Philip S., Lane, Peter W., Westgate, Martin J., McBurney, Lachlan, Blair, David, Gibbons, Philip, Likens, Gene E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807
_version_ 1782304969133654016
author Lindenmayer, David B.
Barton, Philip S.
Lane, Peter W.
Westgate, Martin J.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Gibbons, Philip
Likens, Gene E.
author_facet Lindenmayer, David B.
Barton, Philip S.
Lane, Peter W.
Westgate, Martin J.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Gibbons, Philip
Likens, Gene E.
author_sort Lindenmayer, David B.
collection PubMed
description A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39336862014-02-25 An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees Lindenmayer, David B. Barton, Philip S. Lane, Peter W. Westgate, Martin J. McBurney, Lachlan Blair, David Gibbons, Philip Likens, Gene E. PLoS One Research Article A holy grail of conservation is to find simple but reliable measures of environmental change to guide management. For example, particular species or particular habitat attributes are often used as proxies for the abundance or diversity of a subset of other taxa. However, the efficacy of such kinds of species-based surrogates and habitat-based surrogates is rarely assessed, nor are different kinds of surrogates compared in terms of their relative effectiveness. We use 30-year datasets on arboreal marsupials and vegetation structure to quantify the effectiveness of: (1) the abundance of a particular species of arboreal marsupial as a species-based surrogate for other arboreal marsupial taxa, (2) hollow-bearing tree abundance as a habitat-based surrogate for arboreal marsupial abundance, and (3) a combination of species- and habitat-based surrogates. We also quantify the robustness of species-based and habitat-based surrogates over time. We then use the same approach to model overall species richness of arboreal marsupials. We show that a species-based surrogate can appear to be a valid surrogate until a habitat-based surrogate is co-examined, after which the effectiveness of the former is lost. The addition of a species-based surrogate to a habitat-based surrogate made little difference in explaining arboreal marsupial abundance, but altered the co-occurrence relationship between species. Hence, there was limited value in simultaneously using a combination of kinds of surrogates. The habitat-based surrogate also generally performed significantly better and was easier and less costly to gather than the species-based surrogate. We found that over 30 years of study, the relationships which underpinned the habitat-based surrogate generally remained positive but variable over time. Our work highlights why it is important to compare the effectiveness of different broad classes of surrogates and identify situations when either species- or habitat-based surrogates are likely to be superior. Public Library of Science 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3933686/ /pubmed/24587050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807 Text en © 2014 Lindenmayer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindenmayer, David B.
Barton, Philip S.
Lane, Peter W.
Westgate, Martin J.
McBurney, Lachlan
Blair, David
Gibbons, Philip
Likens, Gene E.
An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title_full An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title_fullStr An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title_full_unstemmed An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title_short An Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Species-Based and Habitat-Based Surrogates: A Case Study of Forest Vertebrates and Large Old Trees
title_sort empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089807
work_keys_str_mv AT lindenmayerdavidb anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT bartonphilips anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT lanepeterw anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT westgatemartinj anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT mcburneylachlan anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT blairdavid anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT gibbonsphilip anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT likensgenee anempiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT lindenmayerdavidb empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT bartonphilips empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT lanepeterw empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT westgatemartinj empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT mcburneylachlan empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT blairdavid empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT gibbonsphilip empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees
AT likensgenee empiricalassessmentandcomparisonofspeciesbasedandhabitatbasedsurrogatesacasestudyofforestvertebratesandlargeoldtrees