Cargando…

Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods

BACKGROUND: The ‘never event’ concept has been implemented in many acute hospital settings to help prevent serious patient safety incidents. Benefits include increasing awareness of highly important patient safety risks among the healthcare workforce, promoting proactive implementation of preventive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wet, Carl, O’Donnell, Catherine, Bowie, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677536
_version_ 1782305000222883840
author de Wet, Carl
O’Donnell, Catherine
Bowie, Paul
author_facet de Wet, Carl
O’Donnell, Catherine
Bowie, Paul
author_sort de Wet, Carl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘never event’ concept has been implemented in many acute hospital settings to help prevent serious patient safety incidents. Benefits include increasing awareness of highly important patient safety risks among the healthcare workforce, promoting proactive implementation of preventive measures, and facilitating incident reporting. AIM: To develop a preliminary list of never events for general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Application of a range of consensus-building methods in Scottish and UK general practices. METHOD: A total of 345 general practice team members suggested potential never events. Next, ‘informed’ staff (n =15) developed criteria for defining never events and applied the criteria to create a list of candidate never events. Finally, UK primary care patient safety ‘experts’ (n = 17) reviewed, refined, and validated a preliminary list via a modified Delphi group and by completing a content validity index exercise. RESULTS: There were 721 written suggestions received as potential never events. Thematic categorisation reduced this to 38. Five criteria specific to general practice were developed and applied to produce 11 candidate never events. The expert group endorsed a preliminary list of 10 items with a content validity index (CVI) score of >80%. CONCLUSION: A preliminary list of never events was developed for general practice through practitioner experience and consensus-building methods. This is an important first step to determine the potential value of the never event concept in this setting. It is now intended to undertake further testing of this preliminary list to assess its acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness as a safety improvement intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3933834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39338342015-03-01 Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods de Wet, Carl O’Donnell, Catherine Bowie, Paul Br J Gen Pract BACKGROUND: The ‘never event’ concept has been implemented in many acute hospital settings to help prevent serious patient safety incidents. Benefits include increasing awareness of highly important patient safety risks among the healthcare workforce, promoting proactive implementation of preventive measures, and facilitating incident reporting. AIM: To develop a preliminary list of never events for general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Application of a range of consensus-building methods in Scottish and UK general practices. METHOD: A total of 345 general practice team members suggested potential never events. Next, ‘informed’ staff (n =15) developed criteria for defining never events and applied the criteria to create a list of candidate never events. Finally, UK primary care patient safety ‘experts’ (n = 17) reviewed, refined, and validated a preliminary list via a modified Delphi group and by completing a content validity index exercise. RESULTS: There were 721 written suggestions received as potential never events. Thematic categorisation reduced this to 38. Five criteria specific to general practice were developed and applied to produce 11 candidate never events. The expert group endorsed a preliminary list of 10 items with a content validity index (CVI) score of >80%. CONCLUSION: A preliminary list of never events was developed for general practice through practitioner experience and consensus-building methods. This is an important first step to determine the potential value of the never event concept in this setting. It is now intended to undertake further testing of this preliminary list to assess its acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness as a safety improvement intervention. Royal College of General Practitioners 2014-03 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3933834/ /pubmed/24567655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677536 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle de Wet, Carl
O’Donnell, Catherine
Bowie, Paul
Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title_full Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title_fullStr Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title_full_unstemmed Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title_short Developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
title_sort developing a preliminary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677536
work_keys_str_mv AT dewetcarl developingapreliminarynevereventlistforgeneralpracticeusingconsensusbuildingmethods
AT odonnellcatherine developingapreliminarynevereventlistforgeneralpracticeusingconsensusbuildingmethods
AT bowiepaul developingapreliminarynevereventlistforgeneralpracticeusingconsensusbuildingmethods