Cargando…

High-Resolution Melting Analysis for accurate detection of BRAF mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The high-resolution melting curve analysis (HRMA) might be a good alternative method for rapid detection of BRAF mutations. However, the accuracy of HRMA in detection of BRAF mutations has not been systematically evaluated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 1324 samples fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Dong, Wang, Yan-Yan, Chuai, Zheng-Ran, Huang, Jun-Fu, Wang, Yun-Xia, Liu, Kai, Zhang, Li-Qun, Yang, Zhao, Shi, Da-Chuan, Liu, Qian, Huang, Qing, Fu, Wei-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3933866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24566771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04168
Descripción
Sumario:The high-resolution melting curve analysis (HRMA) might be a good alternative method for rapid detection of BRAF mutations. However, the accuracy of HRMA in detection of BRAF mutations has not been systematically evaluated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 1324 samples from 14 separate studies. The overall sensitivity of HRMA was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75–0.82), and the overall specificity was very high at 0.99 (95% CI = 0.94–0.98). The values for the pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 68.01 (95% CI = 25.33–182.64), 0.06 (95% CI = 0.03–0.11), and1263.76 (95% CI = 393.91–4064.39), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve for the same data shows an area of 1.00 and a Q* value of 0.97. The high sensitivity and specificity, simplicity, low cost, less labor or time and rapid turnaround make HRMA a good alternative method for rapid detection of BRAF mutations in the clinical practice.