Cargando…
Analogy, Cognitive Architecture and Universal Construction: A Tale of Two Systematicities
Cognitive science recognizes two kinds of systematicity: (1) as the property where certain cognitive capacities imply certain other related cognitive capacities (Fodor and Pylyshyn); and (2) as the principle that analogical mappings based on collections of connected relations are preferred over rela...
Autor principal: | Phillips, Steven |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3934878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089152 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematicity and a Categorical Theory of Cognitive Architecture: Universal Construction in Context
por: Phillips, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Categorial Compositionality II: Universal Constructions and a General Theory of (Quasi-)Systematicity in Human Cognition
por: Phillips, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Sheaving—a universal construction for semantic compositionality
por: Phillips, Steven
Publicado: (2020) -
Why Are There Failures of Systematicity? The Empirical Costs and Benefits of Inducing Universal Constructions
por: Phillips, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A tale of two appendices – an unexpected finding
por: Heetun, M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)