Cargando…

Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population

BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolucci, Antonio, Rossi, Maria C, Pellegrini, Fabio, Lucisano, Giuseppe, Pintaudi, Basilio, Gentile, Sandro, Marra, Giampiero, Skovlund, Soren E, Vespasiani, Giacomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83
_version_ 1782305145660375040
author Nicolucci, Antonio
Rossi, Maria C
Pellegrini, Fabio
Lucisano, Giuseppe
Pintaudi, Basilio
Gentile, Sandro
Marra, Giampiero
Skovlund, Soren E
Vespasiani, Giacomo
author_facet Nicolucci, Antonio
Rossi, Maria C
Pellegrini, Fabio
Lucisano, Giuseppe
Pintaudi, Basilio
Gentile, Sandro
Marra, Giampiero
Skovlund, Soren E
Vespasiani, Giacomo
author_sort Nicolucci, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 Italian regions extracted clinical data from electronic databases for measuring process and outcome quality indicators. A random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire including validated instruments to assess patient-centred indicators: SF-12 Health Survey, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, Problem Areas in Diabetes, Health Care Climate Questionnaire, Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Barriers to Medications, Patient Support, Diabetes Self-care Activities, and Global Satisfaction for Diabetes Treatment. Data were discussed with participants in regional meetings. Main problems, obstacles and solutions were identified through a standardized process, and a regional mandate was produced to drive the priority actions. Overall, clinical indicators on 78,854 patients have been measured; additionally, 2,390 patients filled-in the questionnaire. The regional mandates were officially launched in March 2012. Clinical and patient-centred indicators will be evaluated again after 18 months. A final assessment of clinical indicators will take place after 30 months. DISCUSSION: In the context of the BENCH-D study, a set of instruments has been validated to measure patient well-being and satisfaction with the care. In the four regional meetings, different priorities were identified, reflecting different organizational resources of the different areas. In all the regions, a major challenge was represented by the need of skills and instruments to address psychosocial issues of people with diabetes. The BENCH-D study allows a field testing of benchmarking activities focused on clinical and patient-centred indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39350322014-03-05 Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population Nicolucci, Antonio Rossi, Maria C Pellegrini, Fabio Lucisano, Giuseppe Pintaudi, Basilio Gentile, Sandro Marra, Giampiero Skovlund, Soren E Vespasiani, Giacomo Springerplus Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 Italian regions extracted clinical data from electronic databases for measuring process and outcome quality indicators. A random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire including validated instruments to assess patient-centred indicators: SF-12 Health Survey, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, Problem Areas in Diabetes, Health Care Climate Questionnaire, Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Barriers to Medications, Patient Support, Diabetes Self-care Activities, and Global Satisfaction for Diabetes Treatment. Data were discussed with participants in regional meetings. Main problems, obstacles and solutions were identified through a standardized process, and a regional mandate was produced to drive the priority actions. Overall, clinical indicators on 78,854 patients have been measured; additionally, 2,390 patients filled-in the questionnaire. The regional mandates were officially launched in March 2012. Clinical and patient-centred indicators will be evaluated again after 18 months. A final assessment of clinical indicators will take place after 30 months. DISCUSSION: In the context of the BENCH-D study, a set of instruments has been validated to measure patient well-being and satisfaction with the care. In the four regional meetings, different priorities were identified, reflecting different organizational resources of the different areas. In all the regions, a major challenge was represented by the need of skills and instruments to address psychosocial issues of people with diabetes. The BENCH-D study allows a field testing of benchmarking activities focused on clinical and patient-centred indicators. Springer International Publishing 2014-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3935032/ /pubmed/24600541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83 Text en © Nicolucci et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nicolucci, Antonio
Rossi, Maria C
Pellegrini, Fabio
Lucisano, Giuseppe
Pintaudi, Basilio
Gentile, Sandro
Marra, Giampiero
Skovlund, Soren E
Vespasiani, Giacomo
Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title_full Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title_fullStr Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title_short Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
title_sort benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (bench-d) study: protocol, tools, and population
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolucciantonio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT rossimariac benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT pellegrinifabio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT lucisanogiuseppe benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT pintaudibasilio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT gentilesandro benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT marragiampiero benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT skovlundsorene benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT vespasianigiacomo benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation
AT benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation