Cargando…
Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population
BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83 |
_version_ | 1782305145660375040 |
---|---|
author | Nicolucci, Antonio Rossi, Maria C Pellegrini, Fabio Lucisano, Giuseppe Pintaudi, Basilio Gentile, Sandro Marra, Giampiero Skovlund, Soren E Vespasiani, Giacomo |
author_facet | Nicolucci, Antonio Rossi, Maria C Pellegrini, Fabio Lucisano, Giuseppe Pintaudi, Basilio Gentile, Sandro Marra, Giampiero Skovlund, Soren E Vespasiani, Giacomo |
author_sort | Nicolucci, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 Italian regions extracted clinical data from electronic databases for measuring process and outcome quality indicators. A random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire including validated instruments to assess patient-centred indicators: SF-12 Health Survey, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, Problem Areas in Diabetes, Health Care Climate Questionnaire, Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Barriers to Medications, Patient Support, Diabetes Self-care Activities, and Global Satisfaction for Diabetes Treatment. Data were discussed with participants in regional meetings. Main problems, obstacles and solutions were identified through a standardized process, and a regional mandate was produced to drive the priority actions. Overall, clinical indicators on 78,854 patients have been measured; additionally, 2,390 patients filled-in the questionnaire. The regional mandates were officially launched in March 2012. Clinical and patient-centred indicators will be evaluated again after 18 months. A final assessment of clinical indicators will take place after 30 months. DISCUSSION: In the context of the BENCH-D study, a set of instruments has been validated to measure patient well-being and satisfaction with the care. In the four regional meetings, different priorities were identified, reflecting different organizational resources of the different areas. In all the regions, a major challenge was represented by the need of skills and instruments to address psychosocial issues of people with diabetes. The BENCH-D study allows a field testing of benchmarking activities focused on clinical and patient-centred indicators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3935032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39350322014-03-05 Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population Nicolucci, Antonio Rossi, Maria C Pellegrini, Fabio Lucisano, Giuseppe Pintaudi, Basilio Gentile, Sandro Marra, Giampiero Skovlund, Soren E Vespasiani, Giacomo Springerplus Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the context of the DAWN-2 initiatives, the BENCH-D Study aims to test a model of regional benchmarking to improve not only the quality of diabetes care, but also patient-centred outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: As part of the AMD-Annals quality improvement program, 32 diabetes clinics in 4 Italian regions extracted clinical data from electronic databases for measuring process and outcome quality indicators. A random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes filled in a questionnaire including validated instruments to assess patient-centred indicators: SF-12 Health Survey, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, Problem Areas in Diabetes, Health Care Climate Questionnaire, Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Barriers to Medications, Patient Support, Diabetes Self-care Activities, and Global Satisfaction for Diabetes Treatment. Data were discussed with participants in regional meetings. Main problems, obstacles and solutions were identified through a standardized process, and a regional mandate was produced to drive the priority actions. Overall, clinical indicators on 78,854 patients have been measured; additionally, 2,390 patients filled-in the questionnaire. The regional mandates were officially launched in March 2012. Clinical and patient-centred indicators will be evaluated again after 18 months. A final assessment of clinical indicators will take place after 30 months. DISCUSSION: In the context of the BENCH-D study, a set of instruments has been validated to measure patient well-being and satisfaction with the care. In the four regional meetings, different priorities were identified, reflecting different organizational resources of the different areas. In all the regions, a major challenge was represented by the need of skills and instruments to address psychosocial issues of people with diabetes. The BENCH-D study allows a field testing of benchmarking activities focused on clinical and patient-centred indicators. Springer International Publishing 2014-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3935032/ /pubmed/24600541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83 Text en © Nicolucci et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Nicolucci, Antonio Rossi, Maria C Pellegrini, Fabio Lucisano, Giuseppe Pintaudi, Basilio Gentile, Sandro Marra, Giampiero Skovlund, Soren E Vespasiani, Giacomo Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title | Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title_full | Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title_short | Benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study: protocol, tools, and population |
title_sort | benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (bench-d) study: protocol, tools, and population |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-83 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolucciantonio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT rossimariac benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT pellegrinifabio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT lucisanogiuseppe benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT pintaudibasilio benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT gentilesandro benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT marragiampiero benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT skovlundsorene benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT vespasianigiacomo benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation AT benchmarkingnetworkforclinicalandhumanisticoutcomesindiabetesbenchdstudyprotocoltoolsandpopulation |