Cargando…

Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices

A wide range of electronic cigarette (EC) devices, from small cigarette-like (first-generation) to new-generation high-capacity batteries with electronic circuits that provide high energy to a refillable atomizer, are available for smokers to substitute smoking. Nicotine delivery to the bloodstream...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farsalinos, Konstantinos E., Spyrou, Alketa, Tsimopoulou, Kalliroi, Stefopoulos, Christos, Romagna, Giorgio, Voudris, Vassilis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24569565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04133
_version_ 1782305171313786880
author Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Spyrou, Alketa
Tsimopoulou, Kalliroi
Stefopoulos, Christos
Romagna, Giorgio
Voudris, Vassilis
author_facet Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Spyrou, Alketa
Tsimopoulou, Kalliroi
Stefopoulos, Christos
Romagna, Giorgio
Voudris, Vassilis
author_sort Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
collection PubMed
description A wide range of electronic cigarette (EC) devices, from small cigarette-like (first-generation) to new-generation high-capacity batteries with electronic circuits that provide high energy to a refillable atomizer, are available for smokers to substitute smoking. Nicotine delivery to the bloodstream is important in determining the addictiveness of ECs, but also their efficacy as smoking substitutes. In this study, plasma nicotine levels were measured in experienced users using a first- vs. new-generation EC device for 1 hour with an 18 mg/ml nicotine-containing liquid. Plasma nicotine levels were higher by 35–72% when using the new- compared to the first-generation device. Compared to smoking one tobacco cigarette, the EC devices and liquid used in this study delivered one-third to one-fourth the amount of nicotine after 5 minutes of use. New-generation EC devices were more efficient in nicotine delivery, but still delivered nicotine much slower compared to tobacco cigarettes. The use of 18 mg/ml nicotine-concentration liquid probably compromises ECs' effectiveness as smoking substitutes; this study supports the need for higher levels of nicotine-containing liquids (approximately 50 mg/ml) in order to deliver nicotine more effectively and approach the nicotine-delivery profile of tobacco cigarettes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39352062014-02-26 Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices Farsalinos, Konstantinos E. Spyrou, Alketa Tsimopoulou, Kalliroi Stefopoulos, Christos Romagna, Giorgio Voudris, Vassilis Sci Rep Article A wide range of electronic cigarette (EC) devices, from small cigarette-like (first-generation) to new-generation high-capacity batteries with electronic circuits that provide high energy to a refillable atomizer, are available for smokers to substitute smoking. Nicotine delivery to the bloodstream is important in determining the addictiveness of ECs, but also their efficacy as smoking substitutes. In this study, plasma nicotine levels were measured in experienced users using a first- vs. new-generation EC device for 1 hour with an 18 mg/ml nicotine-containing liquid. Plasma nicotine levels were higher by 35–72% when using the new- compared to the first-generation device. Compared to smoking one tobacco cigarette, the EC devices and liquid used in this study delivered one-third to one-fourth the amount of nicotine after 5 minutes of use. New-generation EC devices were more efficient in nicotine delivery, but still delivered nicotine much slower compared to tobacco cigarettes. The use of 18 mg/ml nicotine-concentration liquid probably compromises ECs' effectiveness as smoking substitutes; this study supports the need for higher levels of nicotine-containing liquids (approximately 50 mg/ml) in order to deliver nicotine more effectively and approach the nicotine-delivery profile of tobacco cigarettes. Nature Publishing Group 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3935206/ /pubmed/24569565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04133 Text en Copyright © 2014, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Article
Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Spyrou, Alketa
Tsimopoulou, Kalliroi
Stefopoulos, Christos
Romagna, Giorgio
Voudris, Vassilis
Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title_full Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title_fullStr Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title_full_unstemmed Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title_short Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
title_sort nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24569565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04133
work_keys_str_mv AT farsalinoskonstantinose nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices
AT spyroualketa nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices
AT tsimopouloukalliroi nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices
AT stefopouloschristos nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices
AT romagnagiorgio nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices
AT voudrisvassilis nicotineabsorptionfromelectroniccigaretteusecomparisonbetweenfirstandnewgenerationdevices