Cargando…

MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference

This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leiken, Kimberly, Pylkkänen, Liina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24610968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.863369
_version_ 1782305173330198528
author Leiken, Kimberly
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_facet Leiken, Kimberly
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_sort Leiken, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca's region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39352232014-03-05 MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference Leiken, Kimberly Pylkkänen, Liina Lang Cogn Process Research Article This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca's region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement. Taylor & Francis 2013-12-05 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3935223/ /pubmed/24610968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.863369 Text en © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leiken, Kimberly
Pylkkänen, Liina
MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title_full MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title_fullStr MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title_full_unstemmed MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title_short MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
title_sort meg evidence that the lifg effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24610968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.863369
work_keys_str_mv AT leikenkimberly megevidencethatthelifgeffectofobjectextractionrequiressimilaritybasedinterference
AT pylkkanenliina megevidencethatthelifgeffectofobjectextractionrequiressimilaritybasedinterference