Cargando…

Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range

The minimum distance for which two points still can be separated from each other defines the resolving power of a visual system. In an echo-acoustic context, the resolving power is usually measured as the smallest perceivable distance of two reflecting surfaces on the range axis and is found to be a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Ralph, Knörnschild, Mirjam, Tschapka, Marco, Schneider, Annkathrin, Passauer, Nadine, Kalko, Elisabeth K. V., von Helversen, Otto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24616703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00064
_version_ 1782305194612097024
author Simon, Ralph
Knörnschild, Mirjam
Tschapka, Marco
Schneider, Annkathrin
Passauer, Nadine
Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
von Helversen, Otto
author_facet Simon, Ralph
Knörnschild, Mirjam
Tschapka, Marco
Schneider, Annkathrin
Passauer, Nadine
Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
von Helversen, Otto
author_sort Simon, Ralph
collection PubMed
description The minimum distance for which two points still can be separated from each other defines the resolving power of a visual system. In an echo-acoustic context, the resolving power is usually measured as the smallest perceivable distance of two reflecting surfaces on the range axis and is found to be around half a millimeter for bats employing frequency modulated (FM) echolocation calls. Only few studies measured such thresholds with physical objects, most often bats were trained on virtual echoes i.e., echoes generated and played back by a computer; moreover, bats were sitting while they received the stimuli. In these studies differences in structure depth between 200 and 340 μm were found. However, these low thresholds were never verified for free-flying bats and real physical objects. Here, we show behavioral evidence that the echo-acoustic resolving power for surface structures in fact can be as low as measured for computer generated echoes and even lower, sometimes below 100 μm. We found this exceptional fine discrimination ability only when one of the targets showed spectral interferences in the frequency range of the bats′ echolocation call while the other target did not. This result indicates that surface structure is likely to be perceived as a spectral quality rather than being perceived strictly in the time domain. Further, it points out that sonar resolving power directly depends on the highest frequency/shortest wavelength of the signal employed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39354622014-03-10 Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range Simon, Ralph Knörnschild, Mirjam Tschapka, Marco Schneider, Annkathrin Passauer, Nadine Kalko, Elisabeth K. V. von Helversen, Otto Front Physiol Physiology The minimum distance for which two points still can be separated from each other defines the resolving power of a visual system. In an echo-acoustic context, the resolving power is usually measured as the smallest perceivable distance of two reflecting surfaces on the range axis and is found to be around half a millimeter for bats employing frequency modulated (FM) echolocation calls. Only few studies measured such thresholds with physical objects, most often bats were trained on virtual echoes i.e., echoes generated and played back by a computer; moreover, bats were sitting while they received the stimuli. In these studies differences in structure depth between 200 and 340 μm were found. However, these low thresholds were never verified for free-flying bats and real physical objects. Here, we show behavioral evidence that the echo-acoustic resolving power for surface structures in fact can be as low as measured for computer generated echoes and even lower, sometimes below 100 μm. We found this exceptional fine discrimination ability only when one of the targets showed spectral interferences in the frequency range of the bats′ echolocation call while the other target did not. This result indicates that surface structure is likely to be perceived as a spectral quality rather than being perceived strictly in the time domain. Further, it points out that sonar resolving power directly depends on the highest frequency/shortest wavelength of the signal employed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3935462/ /pubmed/24616703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00064 Text en Copyright © 2014 Simon, Knörnschild, Tschapka, Schneider, Passauer, Kalko and von Helversen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Simon, Ralph
Knörnschild, Mirjam
Tschapka, Marco
Schneider, Annkathrin
Passauer, Nadine
Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
von Helversen, Otto
Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title_full Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title_fullStr Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title_full_unstemmed Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title_short Biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
title_sort biosonar resolving power: echo-acoustic perception of surface structures in the submillimeter range
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24616703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00064
work_keys_str_mv AT simonralph biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT knornschildmirjam biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT tschapkamarco biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT schneiderannkathrin biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT passauernadine biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT kalkoelisabethkv biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange
AT vonhelversenotto biosonarresolvingpowerechoacousticperceptionofsurfacestructuresinthesubmillimeterrange