Cargando…

Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study

Objective To examine whether the age based quality measure for screening for colorectal cancer is associated with overuse of screening in patients aged 70-75 in poor health and underuse in those aged over age 75 in good health. Design Retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic data from the Vet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saini, Sameer D, Vijan, Sandeep, Schoenfeld, Philip, Powell, Adam A, Moser, Stephanie, Kerr, Eve A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24574474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1247
_version_ 1782305215606685696
author Saini, Sameer D
Vijan, Sandeep
Schoenfeld, Philip
Powell, Adam A
Moser, Stephanie
Kerr, Eve A
author_facet Saini, Sameer D
Vijan, Sandeep
Schoenfeld, Philip
Powell, Adam A
Moser, Stephanie
Kerr, Eve A
author_sort Saini, Sameer D
collection PubMed
description Objective To examine whether the age based quality measure for screening for colorectal cancer is associated with overuse of screening in patients aged 70-75 in poor health and underuse in those aged over age 75 in good health. Design Retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. Setting VA Health Care System. Participants Veterans aged ≥50 due for repeat average risk colorectal cancer screening at a primary care visit in fiscal year 2010. Main outcome measures Completion of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing within 24 months of the 2010 visit. Results 399 067 veterans met inclusion/exclusion criteria (mean age 67, 97% men). Of these, 38% had electronically documented screening within 24 months. In multivariable log binomial regression adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and number of primary care visits, screening decreased markedly after the age of 75 (the age cut off used by the quality measure) (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.40). A veteran who was aged 75 and unhealthy (in whom life expectancy might be limited and screening more likely to result in net burden or harm) was significantly more likely to undergo screening than a veteran aged 76 and healthy (unadjusted relative risk 1.64, 1.36 to 1.97). Conclusions Specification of a quality measure can have important implications for clinical care. Future quality measures should focus on individual risk/benefit to ensure that patients who are likely to benefit from a service receive it (regardless of age), and that those who are likely to incur harm are spared unnecessary and costly care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39357392014-03-03 Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study Saini, Sameer D Vijan, Sandeep Schoenfeld, Philip Powell, Adam A Moser, Stephanie Kerr, Eve A BMJ Research Objective To examine whether the age based quality measure for screening for colorectal cancer is associated with overuse of screening in patients aged 70-75 in poor health and underuse in those aged over age 75 in good health. Design Retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. Setting VA Health Care System. Participants Veterans aged ≥50 due for repeat average risk colorectal cancer screening at a primary care visit in fiscal year 2010. Main outcome measures Completion of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing within 24 months of the 2010 visit. Results 399 067 veterans met inclusion/exclusion criteria (mean age 67, 97% men). Of these, 38% had electronically documented screening within 24 months. In multivariable log binomial regression adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, sex, and number of primary care visits, screening decreased markedly after the age of 75 (the age cut off used by the quality measure) (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.40). A veteran who was aged 75 and unhealthy (in whom life expectancy might be limited and screening more likely to result in net burden or harm) was significantly more likely to undergo screening than a veteran aged 76 and healthy (unadjusted relative risk 1.64, 1.36 to 1.97). Conclusions Specification of a quality measure can have important implications for clinical care. Future quality measures should focus on individual risk/benefit to ensure that patients who are likely to benefit from a service receive it (regardless of age), and that those who are likely to incur harm are spared unnecessary and costly care. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3935739/ /pubmed/24574474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1247 Text en © Saini et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Saini, Sameer D
Vijan, Sandeep
Schoenfeld, Philip
Powell, Adam A
Moser, Stephanie
Kerr, Eve A
Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title_full Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title_short Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
title_sort role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24574474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1247
work_keys_str_mv AT sainisameerd roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vijansandeep roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy
AT schoenfeldphilip roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy
AT powelladama roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy
AT moserstephanie roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kerrevea roleofqualitymeasurementininappropriateuseofscreeningforcolorectalcancerretrospectivecohortstudy