Cargando…

A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PSA block injection with infiltration technique regarding local anesthesia for surgical extraction of upper third molar. Material and Methods: A prospective, intra individual, single-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24596629
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51199
_version_ 1782305240485199872
author Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA.
author_facet Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA.
author_sort Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PSA block injection with infiltration technique regarding local anesthesia for surgical extraction of upper third molar. Material and Methods: A prospective, intra individual, single-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to study the severity of pain during injection and after surgical extraction of the bilaterally and symmetrically similar upper third molar in a total of 53 patients, in addition to evaluating the need to repeat the injection and requirement of post operative anti-inflammatory tablets. Result: Although the average pain score for all studied times in PSA side was lower than the average pain score in infiltration technique, repeated statistical measures demonstrated that no significant pain reduction occurred in the two techniques. Conclusion: The both tested methods have the same statistic equivalence for the surgical extraction of maxillary third molars. Key words:Surgical extraction, maxillary third molars, PSA block, infiltration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3935899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39358992014-03-04 A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA. J Clin Exp Dent Research Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PSA block injection with infiltration technique regarding local anesthesia for surgical extraction of upper third molar. Material and Methods: A prospective, intra individual, single-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to study the severity of pain during injection and after surgical extraction of the bilaterally and symmetrically similar upper third molar in a total of 53 patients, in addition to evaluating the need to repeat the injection and requirement of post operative anti-inflammatory tablets. Result: Although the average pain score for all studied times in PSA side was lower than the average pain score in infiltration technique, repeated statistical measures demonstrated that no significant pain reduction occurred in the two techniques. Conclusion: The both tested methods have the same statistic equivalence for the surgical extraction of maxillary third molars. Key words:Surgical extraction, maxillary third molars, PSA block, infiltration. Medicina Oral S.L. 2014-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3935899/ /pubmed/24596629 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51199 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Al-Delayme, Ra´ed MA.
A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title_full A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title_fullStr A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title_short A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
title_sort comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: psa nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24596629
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51199
work_keys_str_mv AT aldelaymeraedma acomparisonoftwoanesthesiamethodsforthesurgicalremovalofmaxillarythirdmolarspsanerveblocktechniquevslocalinfiltrationtechnique
AT aldelaymeraedma comparisonoftwoanesthesiamethodsforthesurgicalremovalofmaxillarythirdmolarspsanerveblocktechniquevslocalinfiltrationtechnique