Cargando…

Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of early feeding in patients that have undergone emergency gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 84 patients that underwent emergency bowel resection and/or anastomosis from March 2008 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyung Soon, Shim, Hongjin, Jang, Ji Young, Lee, Hosun, Lee, Jae Gil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24532509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.395
_version_ 1782305330426806272
author Lee, Hyung Soon
Shim, Hongjin
Jang, Ji Young
Lee, Hosun
Lee, Jae Gil
author_facet Lee, Hyung Soon
Shim, Hongjin
Jang, Ji Young
Lee, Hosun
Lee, Jae Gil
author_sort Lee, Hyung Soon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of early feeding in patients that have undergone emergency gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 84 patients that underwent emergency bowel resection and/or anastomosis from March 2008 to December 2011. Patients with severe shock, intestinal ischemia, sustained bowel perforation, or short bowel syndrome were excluded. Patients were divided into the early (group E; n=44) or late (group L; n=40) group according to the time of feeding commencement. Early feeding was defined as enteral feeding that started within 48 hours after surgery. Early and late feeding groups were compared with respect to clinical data and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The most common cause of operation was bowel perforation, and the small bowel was the most commonly involved site. No significant intergroup differences were found for causes, sites, or types of operation. However, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (1 day vs. 2 days, p=0.038) and LOS in the hospital after surgery were significantly greater (9 days vs. 12 days, p=0.012) in group L than group E; pulmonary complications were also significantly more common (13.6% vs. 47.5%, p=0.001) in group L than group E. CONCLUSION: After emergency GI surgery, early feeding may be feasible in patients without severe shock or bowel anastomosis instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3936612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39366122014-03-04 Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery Lee, Hyung Soon Shim, Hongjin Jang, Ji Young Lee, Hosun Lee, Jae Gil Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of early feeding in patients that have undergone emergency gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 84 patients that underwent emergency bowel resection and/or anastomosis from March 2008 to December 2011. Patients with severe shock, intestinal ischemia, sustained bowel perforation, or short bowel syndrome were excluded. Patients were divided into the early (group E; n=44) or late (group L; n=40) group according to the time of feeding commencement. Early feeding was defined as enteral feeding that started within 48 hours after surgery. Early and late feeding groups were compared with respect to clinical data and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The most common cause of operation was bowel perforation, and the small bowel was the most commonly involved site. No significant intergroup differences were found for causes, sites, or types of operation. However, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (1 day vs. 2 days, p=0.038) and LOS in the hospital after surgery were significantly greater (9 days vs. 12 days, p=0.012) in group L than group E; pulmonary complications were also significantly more common (13.6% vs. 47.5%, p=0.001) in group L than group E. CONCLUSION: After emergency GI surgery, early feeding may be feasible in patients without severe shock or bowel anastomosis instability. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014-03-01 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3936612/ /pubmed/24532509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.395 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hyung Soon
Shim, Hongjin
Jang, Ji Young
Lee, Hosun
Lee, Jae Gil
Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title_full Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title_fullStr Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title_short Early Feeding Is Feasible after Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery
title_sort early feeding is feasible after emergency gastrointestinal surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24532509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.395
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyungsoon earlyfeedingisfeasibleafteremergencygastrointestinalsurgery
AT shimhongjin earlyfeedingisfeasibleafteremergencygastrointestinalsurgery
AT jangjiyoung earlyfeedingisfeasibleafteremergencygastrointestinalsurgery
AT leehosun earlyfeedingisfeasibleafteremergencygastrointestinalsurgery
AT leejaegil earlyfeedingisfeasibleafteremergencygastrointestinalsurgery