Cargando…

IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and durability of endovascular revascularization therapies for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) are challenged by the extensive burden of infrapopliteal arterial disease and lesion-related characteristics (e.g., severe calcification, chronic total occlusions), which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeller, Thomas, Baumgartner, Iris, Scheinert, Dierk, Brodmann, Marianne, Bosiers, Marc, Micari, Antonio, Peeters, Patrick, Vermassen, Frank, Landini, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24552184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-63
_version_ 1782305393389600768
author Zeller, Thomas
Baumgartner, Iris
Scheinert, Dierk
Brodmann, Marianne
Bosiers, Marc
Micari, Antonio
Peeters, Patrick
Vermassen, Frank
Landini, Mario
author_facet Zeller, Thomas
Baumgartner, Iris
Scheinert, Dierk
Brodmann, Marianne
Bosiers, Marc
Micari, Antonio
Peeters, Patrick
Vermassen, Frank
Landini, Mario
author_sort Zeller, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and durability of endovascular revascularization therapies for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) are challenged by the extensive burden of infrapopliteal arterial disease and lesion-related characteristics (e.g., severe calcification, chronic total occlusions), which frequently result in poor clinical outcomes. While infrapopliteal vessel patency directly affects pain relief and wound healing, sustained patency and extravascular care both contribute to the ultimate “patient-centric” outcomes of functional limb preservation, mobility and quality of life (QoL). METHODS/DESIGN: IN.PACT DEEP is a 2:1 randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of infrapopliteal arterial revascularization between the IN.PACT Amphirion™ paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (IA-DEB) and standard balloon angioplasty (PTA) in patients with Rutherford Class 4-5-6 CLI. DISCUSSION: This multicenter trial has enrolled 358 patients at 13 European centers with independent angiographic core lab adjudication of the primary efficacy endpoint of target lesion late luminal loss (LLL) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in major amputation-free surviving patients through 12-months. An independent wound core lab will evaluate all ischemic wounds to assess the extent of healing and time to healing at 1, 6, and 12 months. A QoL questionnaire including a pain scale will assess changes from baseline scores through 12 months. A Clinical Events Committee and Data Safety Monitoring Board will adjudicate the composite primary safety endpoints of all-cause death, major amputation, and clinically driven TLR at 6 months and other trial endpoints and supervise patient safety throughout the study. All patients will be followed for 5 years. A literature review is presented of the current status of endovascular treatment of CLI with drug-eluting balloon and standard PTA. The rationale and design of the IN.PACT DEEP Trial are discussed. IN.PACT DEEP is a milestone, prospective, randomized, robust, independent core lab-adjudicated CLI trial that will evaluate the role of a new infrapopliteal revascularization technology, the IA-DEB, compared to PTA. It will assess the overall impact on infrapopliteal artery patency, limb salvage, wound healing, pain control, QoL, and patient mobility. The 1-year results of the adjudicated co-primary and secondary endpoints will be available in 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00941733
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3936931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39369312014-02-28 IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial Zeller, Thomas Baumgartner, Iris Scheinert, Dierk Brodmann, Marianne Bosiers, Marc Micari, Antonio Peeters, Patrick Vermassen, Frank Landini, Mario Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and durability of endovascular revascularization therapies for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) are challenged by the extensive burden of infrapopliteal arterial disease and lesion-related characteristics (e.g., severe calcification, chronic total occlusions), which frequently result in poor clinical outcomes. While infrapopliteal vessel patency directly affects pain relief and wound healing, sustained patency and extravascular care both contribute to the ultimate “patient-centric” outcomes of functional limb preservation, mobility and quality of life (QoL). METHODS/DESIGN: IN.PACT DEEP is a 2:1 randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of infrapopliteal arterial revascularization between the IN.PACT Amphirion™ paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (IA-DEB) and standard balloon angioplasty (PTA) in patients with Rutherford Class 4-5-6 CLI. DISCUSSION: This multicenter trial has enrolled 358 patients at 13 European centers with independent angiographic core lab adjudication of the primary efficacy endpoint of target lesion late luminal loss (LLL) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in major amputation-free surviving patients through 12-months. An independent wound core lab will evaluate all ischemic wounds to assess the extent of healing and time to healing at 1, 6, and 12 months. A QoL questionnaire including a pain scale will assess changes from baseline scores through 12 months. A Clinical Events Committee and Data Safety Monitoring Board will adjudicate the composite primary safety endpoints of all-cause death, major amputation, and clinically driven TLR at 6 months and other trial endpoints and supervise patient safety throughout the study. All patients will be followed for 5 years. A literature review is presented of the current status of endovascular treatment of CLI with drug-eluting balloon and standard PTA. The rationale and design of the IN.PACT DEEP Trial are discussed. IN.PACT DEEP is a milestone, prospective, randomized, robust, independent core lab-adjudicated CLI trial that will evaluate the role of a new infrapopliteal revascularization technology, the IA-DEB, compared to PTA. It will assess the overall impact on infrapopliteal artery patency, limb salvage, wound healing, pain control, QoL, and patient mobility. The 1-year results of the adjudicated co-primary and secondary endpoints will be available in 2014. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00941733 BioMed Central 2014-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3936931/ /pubmed/24552184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-63 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zeller et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zeller, Thomas
Baumgartner, Iris
Scheinert, Dierk
Brodmann, Marianne
Bosiers, Marc
Micari, Antonio
Peeters, Patrick
Vermassen, Frank
Landini, Mario
IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title_full IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title_short IN.PACT Amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
title_sort in.pact amphirion paclitaxel eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal revascularization of critical limb ischemia: rationale and protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24552184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-63
work_keys_str_mv AT zellerthomas inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baumgartneriris inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheinertdierk inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brodmannmarianne inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bosiersmarc inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT micariantonio inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peeterspatrick inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vermassenfrank inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT landinimario inpactamphirionpaclitaxelelutingballoonversusstandardpercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyforinfrapoplitealrevascularizationofcriticallimbischemiarationaleandprotocolforanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrial