Cargando…

Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is infrequently performed and 98% of breech presenting fetuses are delivered surgically. Neuraxial analgesia can increase the success rate of ECV significantly, potentially reducing cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation. The current study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiniger, Carolyn F, Spencer, Paul S, Weiss, Yuval, Ginsberg, Gary, Ezra, Yossef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-3-5
_version_ 1782305394752749568
author Weiniger, Carolyn F
Spencer, Paul S
Weiss, Yuval
Ginsberg, Gary
Ezra, Yossef
author_facet Weiniger, Carolyn F
Spencer, Paul S
Weiss, Yuval
Ginsberg, Gary
Ezra, Yossef
author_sort Weiniger, Carolyn F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is infrequently performed and 98% of breech presenting fetuses are delivered surgically. Neuraxial analgesia can increase the success rate of ECV significantly, potentially reducing cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation. The current study aims to determine whether the additional cost to the hospital of spinal anesthesia for ECV is offset by cost savings generated by reduced cesarean delivery. METHODS: In our tertiary hospital, three variables manpower, disposables, and fixed costs were calculated for ECV, ECV plus anesthetic doses of spinal block, vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery. Total procedure costs were compared for possible delivery pathways. Manpower data were obtained from management payroll, fixed costs by calculating cost/lifetime usage rate and disposables were micro-costed in 2008, expressed in 2013 NIS. RESULTS: Cesarean delivery is the most expensive option, 11670.54 NIS and vaginal delivery following successful ECV under spinal block costs 5497.2 NIS. ECV alone costs 960.21 NIS, ECV plus spinal anesthesia costs 1386.97 NIS. The highest individual cost items for vaginal, cesarean delivery and ECV were for manpower. Expensive fixed costs for cesarean delivery included operating room trays and postnatal hospitalization (minimum 3 days). ECV with spinal block is cheaper due to lower expected cesarean delivery rate and its lower associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: The additional cost of the spinal anesthesia is offset by increased success rates for the ECV procedure resulting in reduction in the cesarean delivery rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3936937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39369372014-02-28 Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving? Weiniger, Carolyn F Spencer, Paul S Weiss, Yuval Ginsberg, Gary Ezra, Yossef Isr J Health Policy Res Original Research Article BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is infrequently performed and 98% of breech presenting fetuses are delivered surgically. Neuraxial analgesia can increase the success rate of ECV significantly, potentially reducing cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation. The current study aims to determine whether the additional cost to the hospital of spinal anesthesia for ECV is offset by cost savings generated by reduced cesarean delivery. METHODS: In our tertiary hospital, three variables manpower, disposables, and fixed costs were calculated for ECV, ECV plus anesthetic doses of spinal block, vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery. Total procedure costs were compared for possible delivery pathways. Manpower data were obtained from management payroll, fixed costs by calculating cost/lifetime usage rate and disposables were micro-costed in 2008, expressed in 2013 NIS. RESULTS: Cesarean delivery is the most expensive option, 11670.54 NIS and vaginal delivery following successful ECV under spinal block costs 5497.2 NIS. ECV alone costs 960.21 NIS, ECV plus spinal anesthesia costs 1386.97 NIS. The highest individual cost items for vaginal, cesarean delivery and ECV were for manpower. Expensive fixed costs for cesarean delivery included operating room trays and postnatal hospitalization (minimum 3 days). ECV with spinal block is cheaper due to lower expected cesarean delivery rate and its lower associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: The additional cost of the spinal anesthesia is offset by increased success rates for the ECV procedure resulting in reduction in the cesarean delivery rate. BioMed Central 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3936937/ /pubmed/24564984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2014 Weiniger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Weiniger, Carolyn F
Spencer, Paul S
Weiss, Yuval
Ginsberg, Gary
Ezra, Yossef
Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title_full Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title_fullStr Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title_short Reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
title_sort reducing the cesarean delivery rates for breech presentations: administration of spinal anesthesia facilitates manipulation to cephalic presentation, but is it cost saving?
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-3-5
work_keys_str_mv AT weinigercarolynf reducingthecesareandeliveryratesforbreechpresentationsadministrationofspinalanesthesiafacilitatesmanipulationtocephalicpresentationbutisitcostsaving
AT spencerpauls reducingthecesareandeliveryratesforbreechpresentationsadministrationofspinalanesthesiafacilitatesmanipulationtocephalicpresentationbutisitcostsaving
AT weissyuval reducingthecesareandeliveryratesforbreechpresentationsadministrationofspinalanesthesiafacilitatesmanipulationtocephalicpresentationbutisitcostsaving
AT ginsberggary reducingthecesareandeliveryratesforbreechpresentationsadministrationofspinalanesthesiafacilitatesmanipulationtocephalicpresentationbutisitcostsaving
AT ezrayossef reducingthecesareandeliveryratesforbreechpresentationsadministrationofspinalanesthesiafacilitatesmanipulationtocephalicpresentationbutisitcostsaving