Cargando…
How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase?
In laboratory medicine, several studies have described the most frequent errors in the different phases of the total testing process, and a large proportion of these errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Schemes for registration of errors and subsequent feedback to the participants have been con...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627720 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.013 |
_version_ | 1782305399588782080 |
---|---|
author | Kristensen, Gunn B.B. Aakre, Kristin Moberg Kristoffersen, Ann Helen Sandberg, Sverre |
author_facet | Kristensen, Gunn B.B. Aakre, Kristin Moberg Kristoffersen, Ann Helen Sandberg, Sverre |
author_sort | Kristensen, Gunn B.B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In laboratory medicine, several studies have described the most frequent errors in the different phases of the total testing process, and a large proportion of these errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Schemes for registration of errors and subsequent feedback to the participants have been conducted for decades concerning the analytical phase by External Quality Assessment (EQA) organizations operating in most countries. The aim of the paper is to present an overview of different types of EQA schemes for the pre-analytical phase, and give examples of some existing schemes. So far, very few EQA organizations have focused on the pre-analytical phase, and most EQA organizations do not offer pre-analytical EQA schemes (EQAS). It is more difficult to perform and standardize pre-analytical EQAS and also, accreditation bodies do not ask the laboratories for results from such schemes. However, some ongoing EQA programs for the pre-analytical phase do exist, and some examples are given in this paper. The methods used can be divided into three different types; collecting information about pre-analytical laboratory procedures, circulating real samples to collect information about interferences that might affect the measurement procedure, or register actual laboratory errors and relate these to quality indicators. These three types have different focus and different challenges regarding implementation, and a combination of the three is probably necessary to be able to detect and monitor the wide range of errors occurring in the pre-analytical phase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3936964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39369642014-03-13 How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? Kristensen, Gunn B.B. Aakre, Kristin Moberg Kristoffersen, Ann Helen Sandberg, Sverre Biochem Med (Zagreb) Review In laboratory medicine, several studies have described the most frequent errors in the different phases of the total testing process, and a large proportion of these errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Schemes for registration of errors and subsequent feedback to the participants have been conducted for decades concerning the analytical phase by External Quality Assessment (EQA) organizations operating in most countries. The aim of the paper is to present an overview of different types of EQA schemes for the pre-analytical phase, and give examples of some existing schemes. So far, very few EQA organizations have focused on the pre-analytical phase, and most EQA organizations do not offer pre-analytical EQA schemes (EQAS). It is more difficult to perform and standardize pre-analytical EQAS and also, accreditation bodies do not ask the laboratories for results from such schemes. However, some ongoing EQA programs for the pre-analytical phase do exist, and some examples are given in this paper. The methods used can be divided into three different types; collecting information about pre-analytical laboratory procedures, circulating real samples to collect information about interferences that might affect the measurement procedure, or register actual laboratory errors and relate these to quality indicators. These three types have different focus and different challenges regarding implementation, and a combination of the three is probably necessary to be able to detect and monitor the wide range of errors occurring in the pre-analytical phase. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2014-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3936964/ /pubmed/24627720 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.013 Text en © Copyright by Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Kristensen, Gunn B.B. Aakre, Kristin Moberg Kristoffersen, Ann Helen Sandberg, Sverre How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title | How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title_full | How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title_fullStr | How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title_full_unstemmed | How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title_short | How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
title_sort | how to conduct external quality assessment schemes for the pre-analytical phase? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627720 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kristensengunnbb howtoconductexternalqualityassessmentschemesforthepreanalyticalphase AT aakrekristinmoberg howtoconductexternalqualityassessmentschemesforthepreanalyticalphase AT kristoffersenannhelen howtoconductexternalqualityassessmentschemesforthepreanalyticalphase AT sandbergsverre howtoconductexternalqualityassessmentschemesforthepreanalyticalphase |