Cargando…

Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival

BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickens, Borame L, Brant, Hayley L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
_version_ 1782305418390798336
author Dickens, Borame L
Brant, Hayley L
author_facet Dickens, Borame L
Brant, Hayley L
author_sort Dickens, Borame L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts (‘DayGlo’: A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; ‘Brian Clegg’: pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints (‘Brian Clegg’: blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust (‘Brian Clegg’). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. RESULTS: Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ(2) = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ(2) = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ(2) = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ(2) = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ(2) = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39370482014-02-28 Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival Dickens, Borame L Brant, Hayley L Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts (‘DayGlo’: A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; ‘Brian Clegg’: pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints (‘Brian Clegg’: blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust (‘Brian Clegg’). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. RESULTS: Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ(2) = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ(2) = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ(2) = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ(2) = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ(2) = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito. BioMed Central 2014-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3937048/ /pubmed/24520937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dickens and Brant; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dickens, Borame L
Brant, Hayley L
Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title_full Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title_fullStr Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title_full_unstemmed Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title_short Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
title_sort effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on aedes aegypti survival
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
work_keys_str_mv AT dickensboramel effectsofmarkingmethodsandfluorescentdustsonaedesaegyptisurvival
AT branthayleyl effectsofmarkingmethodsandfluorescentdustsonaedesaegyptisurvival