Cargando…
Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dus...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65 |
_version_ | 1782305418390798336 |
---|---|
author | Dickens, Borame L Brant, Hayley L |
author_facet | Dickens, Borame L Brant, Hayley L |
author_sort | Dickens, Borame L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts (‘DayGlo’: A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; ‘Brian Clegg’: pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints (‘Brian Clegg’: blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust (‘Brian Clegg’). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. RESULTS: Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ(2) = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ(2) = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ(2) = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ(2) = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ(2) = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3937048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39370482014-02-28 Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival Dickens, Borame L Brant, Hayley L Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. METHODS: In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts (‘DayGlo’: A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; ‘Brian Clegg’: pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints (‘Brian Clegg’: blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust (‘Brian Clegg’). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. RESULTS: Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ(2) = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ(2) = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ(2) = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ(2) = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ(2) = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ(2) = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ(2) = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ(2) = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito. BioMed Central 2014-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3937048/ /pubmed/24520937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dickens and Brant; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dickens, Borame L Brant, Hayley L Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title | Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title_full | Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title_fullStr | Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title_short | Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival |
title_sort | effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on aedes aegypti survival |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickensboramel effectsofmarkingmethodsandfluorescentdustsonaedesaegyptisurvival AT branthayleyl effectsofmarkingmethodsandfluorescentdustsonaedesaegyptisurvival |