Cargando…
Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a severe condition which has devastating consequences for a woman’s life. The estimation of the burden of fistula at the population level has been impaired by the rarity of diagnosis and the lack of rigorous studies. This study was conducted to determine the prevalen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-246 |
_version_ | 1782305443332227072 |
---|---|
author | Adler, A J Ronsmans, C Calvert, C Filippi, V |
author_facet | Adler, A J Ronsmans, C Calvert, C Filippi, V |
author_sort | Adler, A J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a severe condition which has devastating consequences for a woman’s life. The estimation of the burden of fistula at the population level has been impaired by the rarity of diagnosis and the lack of rigorous studies. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and incidence of fistula in low and middle income countries. METHODS: Six databases were searched, involving two separate searches: one on fistula specifically and one on broader maternal and reproductive morbidities. Studies including estimates of incidence and prevalence of fistula at the population level were included. We conducted meta-analyses of prevalence of fistula among women of reproductive age and the incidence of fistula among recently pregnant women. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in this review. The pooled prevalence in population-based studies was 0.29 (95% CI 0.00, 1.07) fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age in all regions. Separated by region we found 1.57 (95% CI 1.16, 2.06) in sub Saharan Africa and South Asia, 1.60 (95% CI 1.16, 2.10) per 1000 women of reproductive age in sub Saharan Africa and 1.20 (95% CI 0.10, 3.54) per 1000 in South Asia. The pooled incidence was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01, 0.25) per 1000 recently pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the most comprehensive study of the burden of fistula to date. Our findings suggest that the prevalence of fistula is lower than previously reported. The low burden of fistula should not detract from their public health importance, however, given the preventability of the condition, and the devastating consequences of fistula. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3937166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39371662014-02-28 Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adler, A J Ronsmans, C Calvert, C Filippi, V BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a severe condition which has devastating consequences for a woman’s life. The estimation of the burden of fistula at the population level has been impaired by the rarity of diagnosis and the lack of rigorous studies. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and incidence of fistula in low and middle income countries. METHODS: Six databases were searched, involving two separate searches: one on fistula specifically and one on broader maternal and reproductive morbidities. Studies including estimates of incidence and prevalence of fistula at the population level were included. We conducted meta-analyses of prevalence of fistula among women of reproductive age and the incidence of fistula among recently pregnant women. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in this review. The pooled prevalence in population-based studies was 0.29 (95% CI 0.00, 1.07) fistula per 1000 women of reproductive age in all regions. Separated by region we found 1.57 (95% CI 1.16, 2.06) in sub Saharan Africa and South Asia, 1.60 (95% CI 1.16, 2.10) per 1000 women of reproductive age in sub Saharan Africa and 1.20 (95% CI 0.10, 3.54) per 1000 in South Asia. The pooled incidence was 0.09 (95% CI 0.01, 0.25) per 1000 recently pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the most comprehensive study of the burden of fistula to date. Our findings suggest that the prevalence of fistula is lower than previously reported. The low burden of fistula should not detract from their public health importance, however, given the preventability of the condition, and the devastating consequences of fistula. BioMed Central 2013-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3937166/ /pubmed/24373152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-246 Text en Copyright © 2013 Adler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adler, A J Ronsmans, C Calvert, C Filippi, V Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adleraj estimatingtheprevalenceofobstetricfistulaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ronsmansc estimatingtheprevalenceofobstetricfistulaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT calvertc estimatingtheprevalenceofobstetricfistulaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT filippiv estimatingtheprevalenceofobstetricfistulaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |