Cargando…

Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation

INTRODUCTION: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used in many countries to prioritize organ allocation for the majority of patients who require orthotopic liver transplantation. This score is calculated based on the following laboratory parameters: creatinine, bilirubin and the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Thorsten, Kinny-Köster, Benedict, Bartels, Michael, Parthaune, Tanja, Schmidt, Michael, Thiery, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090015
_version_ 1782305488063430656
author Kaiser, Thorsten
Kinny-Köster, Benedict
Bartels, Michael
Parthaune, Tanja
Schmidt, Michael
Thiery, Joachim
author_facet Kaiser, Thorsten
Kinny-Köster, Benedict
Bartels, Michael
Parthaune, Tanja
Schmidt, Michael
Thiery, Joachim
author_sort Kaiser, Thorsten
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used in many countries to prioritize organ allocation for the majority of patients who require orthotopic liver transplantation. This score is calculated based on the following laboratory parameters: creatinine, bilirubin and the international normalized ratio (INR). Consequently, high measurement accuracy is essential for equitable and fair organ allocation. For serum creatinine measurements, the Jaffé method and enzymatic detection are well-established routine diagnostic tests. METHODS: A total of 1,013 samples from 445 patients on the waiting list or in evaluation for liver transplantation were measured using both creatinine methods from November 2012 to September 2013 at the university hospital Leipzig, Germany. The measurements were performed in parallel according to the manufacturer’s instructions after the samples arrived at the institute of laboratory medicine. Patients who had required renal replacement therapy twice in the previous week were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: Despite the good correlation between the results of both creatinine quantification methods, relevant differences were observed, which led to different MELD scores. The Jaffé measurement led to greater MELD score in 163/1,013 (16.1%) samples with differences of up to 4 points in one patient, whereas differences of up to 2 points were identified in 15/1,013 (1.5%) samples using the enzymatic assay. Overall, 50/152 (32.9%) patients with MELD scores >20 had higher scores when the Jaffé method was used. DISCUSSION: Using the Jaffé method to measure creatinine levels in samples from patients who require liver transplantation may lead to a systematic preference in organ allocation. In this study, the differences were particularly pronounced in samples with MELD scores >20, which has clinical relevance in the context of urgency of transplantation. These data suggest that official recommendations are needed to determine which laboratory diagnostic methods should be used when calculating MELD scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39374032014-03-04 Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation Kaiser, Thorsten Kinny-Köster, Benedict Bartels, Michael Parthaune, Tanja Schmidt, Michael Thiery, Joachim PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used in many countries to prioritize organ allocation for the majority of patients who require orthotopic liver transplantation. This score is calculated based on the following laboratory parameters: creatinine, bilirubin and the international normalized ratio (INR). Consequently, high measurement accuracy is essential for equitable and fair organ allocation. For serum creatinine measurements, the Jaffé method and enzymatic detection are well-established routine diagnostic tests. METHODS: A total of 1,013 samples from 445 patients on the waiting list or in evaluation for liver transplantation were measured using both creatinine methods from November 2012 to September 2013 at the university hospital Leipzig, Germany. The measurements were performed in parallel according to the manufacturer’s instructions after the samples arrived at the institute of laboratory medicine. Patients who had required renal replacement therapy twice in the previous week were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: Despite the good correlation between the results of both creatinine quantification methods, relevant differences were observed, which led to different MELD scores. The Jaffé measurement led to greater MELD score in 163/1,013 (16.1%) samples with differences of up to 4 points in one patient, whereas differences of up to 2 points were identified in 15/1,013 (1.5%) samples using the enzymatic assay. Overall, 50/152 (32.9%) patients with MELD scores >20 had higher scores when the Jaffé method was used. DISCUSSION: Using the Jaffé method to measure creatinine levels in samples from patients who require liver transplantation may lead to a systematic preference in organ allocation. In this study, the differences were particularly pronounced in samples with MELD scores >20, which has clinical relevance in the context of urgency of transplantation. These data suggest that official recommendations are needed to determine which laboratory diagnostic methods should be used when calculating MELD scores. Public Library of Science 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3937403/ /pubmed/24587188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090015 Text en © 2014 Kaiser et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaiser, Thorsten
Kinny-Köster, Benedict
Bartels, Michael
Parthaune, Tanja
Schmidt, Michael
Thiery, Joachim
Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title_full Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title_fullStr Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title_short Impact of Different Creatinine Measurement Methods on Liver Transplant Allocation
title_sort impact of different creatinine measurement methods on liver transplant allocation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090015
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserthorsten impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation
AT kinnykosterbenedict impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation
AT bartelsmichael impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation
AT parthaunetanja impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation
AT schmidtmichael impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation
AT thieryjoachim impactofdifferentcreatininemeasurementmethodsonlivertransplantallocation