Cargando…

The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol

BACKGROUND: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders, and show good clinical results. Still, complications such as subsidence and migration of the cage are frequently seen. A lack of osteointegration and fibrous tissues surroundin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kersten, Roel FMR, van Gaalen, Steven M, Arts, Mark P, Roes, Kit CB, de Gast, Arthur, Corbin, Terry P, Öner, F Cumhur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-57
_version_ 1782305499339816960
author Kersten, Roel FMR
van Gaalen, Steven M
Arts, Mark P
Roes, Kit CB
de Gast, Arthur
Corbin, Terry P
Öner, F Cumhur
author_facet Kersten, Roel FMR
van Gaalen, Steven M
Arts, Mark P
Roes, Kit CB
de Gast, Arthur
Corbin, Terry P
Öner, F Cumhur
author_sort Kersten, Roel FMR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders, and show good clinical results. Still, complications such as subsidence and migration of the cage are frequently seen. A lack of osteointegration and fibrous tissues surrounding PEEK cages are held responsible. Ceramic implants made of silicon nitride show better biocompatible and osteoconductive qualities, and therefore are expected to lower complication rates and allow for better fusion. Purpose of this study is to show that fusion with the silicon nitride cage produces non-inferior results in outcome of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at all follow-up time points as compared to the same procedure with PEEK cages. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is designed as a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial with repeated measures analysis. 100 patients (18–75 years) presenting with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disorders unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatment are included. Patients will be randomly assigned to a PEEK cage or a silicon nitride cage, and will undergo a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Primary outcome measure is the functional improvement measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcome parameters are the VAS leg, VAS back, SF-36, Likert scale, neurological outcome and radiographic assessment of fusion. After 1 year the fusion rate will be measured by radiograms and CT. Follow-up will be continued for 2 years. Patients and clinical observers who will perform the follow-up visits will be blinded for type of cage used during follow-up. Analyses of radiograms and CT will be performed independently by two experienced radiologists. DISCUSSION: In this study a PEEK cage will be compared with a silicon nitride cage in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial in which the silicon nitride cage is compared with the PEEK cage in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01557829
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39374532014-03-01 The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol Kersten, Roel FMR van Gaalen, Steven M Arts, Mark P Roes, Kit CB de Gast, Arthur Corbin, Terry P Öner, F Cumhur BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders, and show good clinical results. Still, complications such as subsidence and migration of the cage are frequently seen. A lack of osteointegration and fibrous tissues surrounding PEEK cages are held responsible. Ceramic implants made of silicon nitride show better biocompatible and osteoconductive qualities, and therefore are expected to lower complication rates and allow for better fusion. Purpose of this study is to show that fusion with the silicon nitride cage produces non-inferior results in outcome of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at all follow-up time points as compared to the same procedure with PEEK cages. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is designed as a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial with repeated measures analysis. 100 patients (18–75 years) presenting with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disorders unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatment are included. Patients will be randomly assigned to a PEEK cage or a silicon nitride cage, and will undergo a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Primary outcome measure is the functional improvement measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcome parameters are the VAS leg, VAS back, SF-36, Likert scale, neurological outcome and radiographic assessment of fusion. After 1 year the fusion rate will be measured by radiograms and CT. Follow-up will be continued for 2 years. Patients and clinical observers who will perform the follow-up visits will be blinded for type of cage used during follow-up. Analyses of radiograms and CT will be performed independently by two experienced radiologists. DISCUSSION: In this study a PEEK cage will be compared with a silicon nitride cage in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial in which the silicon nitride cage is compared with the PEEK cage in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01557829 BioMed Central 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3937453/ /pubmed/24568365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-57 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kersten et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kersten, Roel FMR
van Gaalen, Steven M
Arts, Mark P
Roes, Kit CB
de Gast, Arthur
Corbin, Terry P
Öner, F Cumhur
The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title_full The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title_fullStr The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title_short The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
title_sort snap trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a peek cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-57
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstenroelfmr thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT vangaalenstevenm thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT artsmarkp thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT roeskitcb thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT degastarthur thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT corbinterryp thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT onerfcumhur thesnaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT kerstenroelfmr snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT vangaalenstevenm snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT artsmarkp snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT roeskitcb snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT degastarthur snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT corbinterryp snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol
AT onerfcumhur snaptrialadoubleblindmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofasiliconnitrideversusapeekcageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninpatientswithsymptomaticdegenerativelumbardiscdisordersstudyprotocol