Cargando…
A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary end...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87 |
_version_ | 1782305500279341056 |
---|---|
author | Naing, Cho Yeoh, Peng Nam Aung, Kyan |
author_facet | Naing, Cho Yeoh, Peng Nam Aung, Kyan |
author_sort | Naing, Cho |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary endpoints were patient-reported ‘pain intensity’ and ‘pain relief’. Statistical heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the I(2) test. The summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were derived, if two or more studies reported the similar outcome. Sixteen RCTs (n = 1329) with buprenorphine were included: 8 transdermal (TD), 5 sublingual (SL), 2 intramuscular injection (IM) and 1 subcutaneous infusion (SC) studies; with both SL and IM routes being assessed in one study. Only a few studies reported the same outcome in a similar way, creating difficulty for pooling of the outcome data. Many studies had a high risk of bias. In 2 studies (n = 241), the ‘global impression change’ was significantly different between TD buprenorphine and the combined placebo and morphine (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59; I(2): 42%); the ‘number-needed-to-treat’ (NNT) was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.1-10.9). In 2 studies (n = 331), ‘requirement for rescue SL buprenorphine’ was comparable between TD buprenorphine and placebo (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71-2.18; I(2) : 40%). In 2 studies (n = 141), ‘incidence of nausea’ was less in TD buprenorphine (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.2-0.71, I(2): 0%, NNT: 9.3, 5.6-28.5). Due to the small number of participants in a small number of studies, the results of the present review provide insufficient evidence to position adequately the use of buprenorphine in treatment of cancer pain. Large multicenter RCTs that compare TD buprenorphine with standard analgesic treatment is needed to position TD buprenorphine in the therapeutic armamentarium of cancer pain treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-87) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3937458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39374582014-03-05 A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain Naing, Cho Yeoh, Peng Nam Aung, Kyan Springerplus Review This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary endpoints were patient-reported ‘pain intensity’ and ‘pain relief’. Statistical heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the I(2) test. The summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were derived, if two or more studies reported the similar outcome. Sixteen RCTs (n = 1329) with buprenorphine were included: 8 transdermal (TD), 5 sublingual (SL), 2 intramuscular injection (IM) and 1 subcutaneous infusion (SC) studies; with both SL and IM routes being assessed in one study. Only a few studies reported the same outcome in a similar way, creating difficulty for pooling of the outcome data. Many studies had a high risk of bias. In 2 studies (n = 241), the ‘global impression change’ was significantly different between TD buprenorphine and the combined placebo and morphine (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59; I(2): 42%); the ‘number-needed-to-treat’ (NNT) was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.1-10.9). In 2 studies (n = 331), ‘requirement for rescue SL buprenorphine’ was comparable between TD buprenorphine and placebo (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71-2.18; I(2) : 40%). In 2 studies (n = 141), ‘incidence of nausea’ was less in TD buprenorphine (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.2-0.71, I(2): 0%, NNT: 9.3, 5.6-28.5). Due to the small number of participants in a small number of studies, the results of the present review provide insufficient evidence to position adequately the use of buprenorphine in treatment of cancer pain. Large multicenter RCTs that compare TD buprenorphine with standard analgesic treatment is needed to position TD buprenorphine in the therapeutic armamentarium of cancer pain treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-87) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3937458/ /pubmed/24600544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87 Text en © Naing et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Naing, Cho Yeoh, Peng Nam Aung, Kyan A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title | A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title_full | A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title_short | A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
title_sort | meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naingcho ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain AT yeohpengnam ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain AT aungkyan ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain AT naingcho metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain AT yeohpengnam metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain AT aungkyan metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain |