Cargando…

A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain

This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naing, Cho, Yeoh, Peng Nam, Aung, Kyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87
_version_ 1782305500279341056
author Naing, Cho
Yeoh, Peng Nam
Aung, Kyan
author_facet Naing, Cho
Yeoh, Peng Nam
Aung, Kyan
author_sort Naing, Cho
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary endpoints were patient-reported ‘pain intensity’ and ‘pain relief’. Statistical heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the I(2) test. The summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were derived, if two or more studies reported the similar outcome. Sixteen RCTs (n = 1329) with buprenorphine were included: 8 transdermal (TD), 5 sublingual (SL), 2 intramuscular injection (IM) and 1 subcutaneous infusion (SC) studies; with both SL and IM routes being assessed in one study. Only a few studies reported the same outcome in a similar way, creating difficulty for pooling of the outcome data. Many studies had a high risk of bias. In 2 studies (n = 241), the ‘global impression change’ was significantly different between TD buprenorphine and the combined placebo and morphine (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59; I(2): 42%); the ‘number-needed-to-treat’ (NNT) was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.1-10.9). In 2 studies (n = 331), ‘requirement for rescue SL buprenorphine’ was comparable between TD buprenorphine and placebo (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71-2.18; I(2) : 40%). In 2 studies (n = 141), ‘incidence of nausea’ was less in TD buprenorphine (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.2-0.71, I(2): 0%, NNT: 9.3, 5.6-28.5). Due to the small number of participants in a small number of studies, the results of the present review provide insufficient evidence to position adequately the use of buprenorphine in treatment of cancer pain. Large multicenter RCTs that compare TD buprenorphine with standard analgesic treatment is needed to position TD buprenorphine in the therapeutic armamentarium of cancer pain treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-87) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39374582014-03-05 A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain Naing, Cho Yeoh, Peng Nam Aung, Kyan Springerplus Review This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in treating cancer pain and related adverse effects. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine, regardless of delivery system. The primary endpoints were patient-reported ‘pain intensity’ and ‘pain relief’. Statistical heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the I(2) test. The summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were derived, if two or more studies reported the similar outcome. Sixteen RCTs (n = 1329) with buprenorphine were included: 8 transdermal (TD), 5 sublingual (SL), 2 intramuscular injection (IM) and 1 subcutaneous infusion (SC) studies; with both SL and IM routes being assessed in one study. Only a few studies reported the same outcome in a similar way, creating difficulty for pooling of the outcome data. Many studies had a high risk of bias. In 2 studies (n = 241), the ‘global impression change’ was significantly different between TD buprenorphine and the combined placebo and morphine (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.59; I(2): 42%); the ‘number-needed-to-treat’ (NNT) was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.1-10.9). In 2 studies (n = 331), ‘requirement for rescue SL buprenorphine’ was comparable between TD buprenorphine and placebo (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71-2.18; I(2) : 40%). In 2 studies (n = 141), ‘incidence of nausea’ was less in TD buprenorphine (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.2-0.71, I(2): 0%, NNT: 9.3, 5.6-28.5). Due to the small number of participants in a small number of studies, the results of the present review provide insufficient evidence to position adequately the use of buprenorphine in treatment of cancer pain. Large multicenter RCTs that compare TD buprenorphine with standard analgesic treatment is needed to position TD buprenorphine in the therapeutic armamentarium of cancer pain treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-87) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3937458/ /pubmed/24600544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87 Text en © Naing et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Naing, Cho
Yeoh, Peng Nam
Aung, Kyan
A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title_full A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title_short A meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
title_sort meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability of buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24600544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-87
work_keys_str_mv AT naingcho ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain
AT yeohpengnam ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain
AT aungkyan ametaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain
AT naingcho metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain
AT yeohpengnam metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain
AT aungkyan metaanalysisofefficacyandtolerabilityofbuprenorphineforthereliefofcancerpain