Cargando…

Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: First-generation molecular profiles for human breast cancers have enabled the identification of features that can predict therapeutic response; however, little is known about how the various data types can best be combined to yield optimal predictors. Collections of breast cancer cell li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daemen, Anneleen, Griffith, Obi L, Heiser, Laura M, Wang, Nicholas J, Enache, Oana M, Sanborn, Zachary, Pepin, Francois, Durinck, Steffen, Korkola, James E, Griffith, Malachi, Hur, Joe S, Huh, Nam, Chung, Jongsuk, Cope, Leslie, Fackler, Mary Jo, Umbricht, Christopher, Sukumar, Saraswati, Seth, Pankaj, Sukhatme, Vikas P, Jakkula, Lakshmi R, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Cho, Raymond J, Collisson, Eric A, van’t Veer, Laura J, Spellman, Paul T, Gray, Joe W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r110
_version_ 1782305523421413376
author Daemen, Anneleen
Griffith, Obi L
Heiser, Laura M
Wang, Nicholas J
Enache, Oana M
Sanborn, Zachary
Pepin, Francois
Durinck, Steffen
Korkola, James E
Griffith, Malachi
Hur, Joe S
Huh, Nam
Chung, Jongsuk
Cope, Leslie
Fackler, Mary Jo
Umbricht, Christopher
Sukumar, Saraswati
Seth, Pankaj
Sukhatme, Vikas P
Jakkula, Lakshmi R
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Cho, Raymond J
Collisson, Eric A
van’t Veer, Laura J
Spellman, Paul T
Gray, Joe W
author_facet Daemen, Anneleen
Griffith, Obi L
Heiser, Laura M
Wang, Nicholas J
Enache, Oana M
Sanborn, Zachary
Pepin, Francois
Durinck, Steffen
Korkola, James E
Griffith, Malachi
Hur, Joe S
Huh, Nam
Chung, Jongsuk
Cope, Leslie
Fackler, Mary Jo
Umbricht, Christopher
Sukumar, Saraswati
Seth, Pankaj
Sukhatme, Vikas P
Jakkula, Lakshmi R
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Cho, Raymond J
Collisson, Eric A
van’t Veer, Laura J
Spellman, Paul T
Gray, Joe W
author_sort Daemen, Anneleen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: First-generation molecular profiles for human breast cancers have enabled the identification of features that can predict therapeutic response; however, little is known about how the various data types can best be combined to yield optimal predictors. Collections of breast cancer cell lines mirror many aspects of breast cancer molecular pathobiology, and measurements of their omic and biological therapeutic responses are well-suited for development of strategies to identify the most predictive molecular feature sets. RESULTS: We used least squares-support vector machines and random forest algorithms to identify molecular features associated with responses of a collection of 70 breast cancer cell lines to 90 experimental or approved therapeutic agents. The datasets analyzed included measurements of copy number aberrations, mutations, gene and isoform expression, promoter methylation and protein expression. Transcriptional subtype contributed strongly to response predictors for 25% of compounds, and adding other molecular data types improved prediction for 65%. No single molecular dataset consistently out-performed the others, suggesting that therapeutic response is mediated at multiple levels in the genome. Response predictors were developed and applied to TCGA data, and were found to be present in subsets of those patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that matching patients to treatments based on transcriptional subtype will improve response rates, and inclusion of additional features from other profiling data types may provide additional benefit. Further, we suggest a systems biology strategy for guiding clinical trials so that patient cohorts most likely to respond to new therapies may be more efficiently identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39375902014-02-28 Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer Daemen, Anneleen Griffith, Obi L Heiser, Laura M Wang, Nicholas J Enache, Oana M Sanborn, Zachary Pepin, Francois Durinck, Steffen Korkola, James E Griffith, Malachi Hur, Joe S Huh, Nam Chung, Jongsuk Cope, Leslie Fackler, Mary Jo Umbricht, Christopher Sukumar, Saraswati Seth, Pankaj Sukhatme, Vikas P Jakkula, Lakshmi R Lu, Yiling Mills, Gordon B Cho, Raymond J Collisson, Eric A van’t Veer, Laura J Spellman, Paul T Gray, Joe W Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: First-generation molecular profiles for human breast cancers have enabled the identification of features that can predict therapeutic response; however, little is known about how the various data types can best be combined to yield optimal predictors. Collections of breast cancer cell lines mirror many aspects of breast cancer molecular pathobiology, and measurements of their omic and biological therapeutic responses are well-suited for development of strategies to identify the most predictive molecular feature sets. RESULTS: We used least squares-support vector machines and random forest algorithms to identify molecular features associated with responses of a collection of 70 breast cancer cell lines to 90 experimental or approved therapeutic agents. The datasets analyzed included measurements of copy number aberrations, mutations, gene and isoform expression, promoter methylation and protein expression. Transcriptional subtype contributed strongly to response predictors for 25% of compounds, and adding other molecular data types improved prediction for 65%. No single molecular dataset consistently out-performed the others, suggesting that therapeutic response is mediated at multiple levels in the genome. Response predictors were developed and applied to TCGA data, and were found to be present in subsets of those patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that matching patients to treatments based on transcriptional subtype will improve response rates, and inclusion of additional features from other profiling data types may provide additional benefit. Further, we suggest a systems biology strategy for guiding clinical trials so that patient cohorts most likely to respond to new therapies may be more efficiently identified. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3937590/ /pubmed/24176112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r110 Text en Copyright © 2013 Daemen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Daemen, Anneleen
Griffith, Obi L
Heiser, Laura M
Wang, Nicholas J
Enache, Oana M
Sanborn, Zachary
Pepin, Francois
Durinck, Steffen
Korkola, James E
Griffith, Malachi
Hur, Joe S
Huh, Nam
Chung, Jongsuk
Cope, Leslie
Fackler, Mary Jo
Umbricht, Christopher
Sukumar, Saraswati
Seth, Pankaj
Sukhatme, Vikas P
Jakkula, Lakshmi R
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Cho, Raymond J
Collisson, Eric A
van’t Veer, Laura J
Spellman, Paul T
Gray, Joe W
Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title_full Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title_fullStr Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title_short Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
title_sort modeling precision treatment of breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r110
work_keys_str_mv AT daemenanneleen modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT griffithobil modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT heiserlauram modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT wangnicholasj modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT enacheoanam modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sanbornzachary modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT pepinfrancois modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT durincksteffen modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT korkolajamese modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT griffithmalachi modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT hurjoes modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT huhnam modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT chungjongsuk modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT copeleslie modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT facklermaryjo modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT umbrichtchristopher modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sukumarsaraswati modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sethpankaj modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sukhatmevikasp modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT jakkulalakshmir modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT luyiling modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT millsgordonb modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT choraymondj modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT collissonerica modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT vantveerlauraj modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT spellmanpault modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer
AT grayjoew modelingprecisiontreatmentofbreastcancer