Cargando…

The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist

BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Jonathan, Shemmell, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189
_version_ 1782305528750276608
author Fox, Jonathan
Shemmell, Jonathan
author_facet Fox, Jonathan
Shemmell, Jonathan
author_sort Fox, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system. METHODS: We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm. RESULTS: LLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39377072014-03-20 The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist Fox, Jonathan Shemmell, Jonathan Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system. METHODS: We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm. RESULTS: LLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed. Wiley Periodicals, Inc 2014-01 2013-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3937707/ /pubmed/24653955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fox, Jonathan
Shemmell, Jonathan
The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title_full The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title_fullStr The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title_full_unstemmed The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title_short The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
title_sort ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189
work_keys_str_mv AT foxjonathan theipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist
AT shemmelljonathan theipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist
AT foxjonathan ipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist
AT shemmelljonathan ipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist