Cargando…
The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist
BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms follo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189 |
_version_ | 1782305528750276608 |
---|---|
author | Fox, Jonathan Shemmell, Jonathan |
author_facet | Fox, Jonathan Shemmell, Jonathan |
author_sort | Fox, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system. METHODS: We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm. RESULTS: LLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3937707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39377072014-03-20 The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist Fox, Jonathan Shemmell, Jonathan Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system. METHODS: We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm. RESULTS: LLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed. Wiley Periodicals, Inc 2014-01 2013-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3937707/ /pubmed/24653955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fox, Jonathan Shemmell, Jonathan The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title | The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title_full | The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title_fullStr | The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title_full_unstemmed | The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title_short | The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
title_sort | ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foxjonathan theipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist AT shemmelljonathan theipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist AT foxjonathan ipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist AT shemmelljonathan ipsilateralmotorcortexdoesnotcontributetolonglatencystretchreflexamplitudeatthewrist |