Cargando…

Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization

Detection of a tactile stimulus on one finger is impaired when a concurrent stimulus (masker) is presented on an additional finger of the same or the opposite hand. This phenomenon is known to be finger-specific at the within-hand level. However, whether this specificity is also maintained at the be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamè, Luigi, Moles, Andrew, Holmes, Nicholas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00174
_version_ 1782305553220894720
author Tamè, Luigi
Moles, Andrew
Holmes, Nicholas P.
author_facet Tamè, Luigi
Moles, Andrew
Holmes, Nicholas P.
author_sort Tamè, Luigi
collection PubMed
description Detection of a tactile stimulus on one finger is impaired when a concurrent stimulus (masker) is presented on an additional finger of the same or the opposite hand. This phenomenon is known to be finger-specific at the within-hand level. However, whether this specificity is also maintained at the between hand level is not known. In four experiments, we addressed this issue by combining a Bayesian adaptive staircase procedure quick estimation of threshold (QUEST) with a two-interval forced choice (2IFC) design in order to establish threshold for detecting 200 ms, 100 Hz sinusoidal vibrations applied to the index or little fingertip of either hand (targets). We systematically varied the masker finger (index, middle, ring, or little finger of either hand), while controlling the spatial location of the target and masker stimuli. Detection thresholds varied consistently as a function of the masker finger when the latter was on the same hand (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when on different hands (Experiments 3 and 4). Within the hand, detection thresholds increased for masker fingers closest to the target finger (i.e., middle > ring when the target was index). Between the hands, detection thresholds were higher only when the masker was present on any finger as compared to when the target was presented in isolation. The within hand effect of masker finger is consistent with the segregation of different fingers at the early stages of somatosensory processing, from the periphery to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). We propose that detection is finger-specific and reflects the organization of somatosensory receptive fields in SI within, but not between the hands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3937991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39379912014-03-03 Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization Tamè, Luigi Moles, Andrew Holmes, Nicholas P. Front Psychol Psychology Detection of a tactile stimulus on one finger is impaired when a concurrent stimulus (masker) is presented on an additional finger of the same or the opposite hand. This phenomenon is known to be finger-specific at the within-hand level. However, whether this specificity is also maintained at the between hand level is not known. In four experiments, we addressed this issue by combining a Bayesian adaptive staircase procedure quick estimation of threshold (QUEST) with a two-interval forced choice (2IFC) design in order to establish threshold for detecting 200 ms, 100 Hz sinusoidal vibrations applied to the index or little fingertip of either hand (targets). We systematically varied the masker finger (index, middle, ring, or little finger of either hand), while controlling the spatial location of the target and masker stimuli. Detection thresholds varied consistently as a function of the masker finger when the latter was on the same hand (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when on different hands (Experiments 3 and 4). Within the hand, detection thresholds increased for masker fingers closest to the target finger (i.e., middle > ring when the target was index). Between the hands, detection thresholds were higher only when the masker was present on any finger as compared to when the target was presented in isolation. The within hand effect of masker finger is consistent with the segregation of different fingers at the early stages of somatosensory processing, from the periphery to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). We propose that detection is finger-specific and reflects the organization of somatosensory receptive fields in SI within, but not between the hands. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3937991/ /pubmed/24592252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00174 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tamè, Moles and Holmes. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Tamè, Luigi
Moles, Andrew
Holmes, Nicholas P.
Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title_full Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title_fullStr Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title_full_unstemmed Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title_short Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
title_sort within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3937991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00174
work_keys_str_mv AT tameluigi withinbutnotbetweenhandsinteractionsinvibrotactiledetectionthresholdsreflectsomatosensoryreceptivefieldorganization
AT molesandrew withinbutnotbetweenhandsinteractionsinvibrotactiledetectionthresholdsreflectsomatosensoryreceptivefieldorganization
AT holmesnicholasp withinbutnotbetweenhandsinteractionsinvibrotactiledetectionthresholdsreflectsomatosensoryreceptivefieldorganization