Cargando…
Systematic analysis of funding awarded for norovirus research to institutions in the United Kingdom, 1997–2010
OBJECTIVES: Norovirus infections pose great economic and disease burden to health systems around the world. This study quantifies the investments in norovirus research awarded to UK institutions over a 14-year time period. DESIGN: A systematic analysis of public and philanthropic infectious disease...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24262891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076813511450 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Norovirus infections pose great economic and disease burden to health systems around the world. This study quantifies the investments in norovirus research awarded to UK institutions over a 14-year time period. DESIGN: A systematic analysis of public and philanthropic infectious disease research investments awarded to UK institutions between 1997 and 2010. PARTICIPANTS: None SETTING: UK institutions carrying out infectious disease research. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total funding for infectious disease research, total funding for norovirus research, position of norovirus research along the R&D value chain. RESULTS: The total dataset consisted of 6165 studies with sum funding of £2.6 billion. Twelve norovirus studies were identified with a total funding of £5.1 million, 0.2% of the total dataset. Of these, eight were categorized as pre-clinical, three as intervention studies and one as implementation research. Median funding was £200,620. CONCLUSIONS: Research funding for norovirus infections in the UK appears to be unacceptably low, given the burden of disease and disability produced by these infections. There is a clear need for new research initiatives along the R&D value chain: from pre-clinical through to implementation research, including trials to assess cost-effectiveness of infection control policies as well as clinical, public health and environmental interventions in hospitals, congregate settings and in the community. |
---|