Cargando…

Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special empha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Junxia, Huang, Yingqun, Cai, Hongbin, Qi, Yue, Jia, Nan, Shen, Weifeng, Lin, Jinxiu, Peng, Feng, Niu, Wenquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323
_version_ 1782305635461758976
author Xu, Junxia
Huang, Yingqun
Cai, Hongbin
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Shen, Weifeng
Lin, Jinxiu
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
author_facet Xu, Junxia
Huang, Yingqun
Cai, Hongbin
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Shen, Weifeng
Lin, Jinxiu
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
author_sort Xu, Junxia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special emphases on comparing the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations by synthesizing published clinical trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Articles were identified by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases before September 2013, by reviewing the bibliographies of eligible reports, and by consulting with experts in this field. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. There were respectively 469 and 635 patients referred for cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations from 14 qualified clinical trials. Overall analyses indicated that cryoballoon ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and total procedure time by a weighted mean of 14.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.82 to 25.45; P = 0.014) minutes and 29.65 (95% CI: 8.54 to 50.77; P = 0.006) minutes compared with radiofrequency ablation, respectively, whereas ablation time in cryoballoon ablation was nonsignificantly elongated by a weighted mean of 11.66 (95% CI: −10.71 to 34.04; P = 0.307) minutes. Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation had a high yet nonsignificant success rate of catheter ablation compared with cryoballoon ablation (odds ratio; 95% CI; P: 1.34; 0.53 to 3.36; 0.538), and cryoballoon ablation was also found to be associated with the relatively low risk of having recurrent atrial fibrillation (0.75; 0.3 to 1.88; 0.538) and major complications (0.46; 0.11 to 1.83; 0.269). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity and low probability of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate greater improvement in fluoroscopic time and total procedure duration for atrial fibrillation patients referred for cryoballoon ablation than those for radiofrequency ablation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3938670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39386702014-03-04 Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis Xu, Junxia Huang, Yingqun Cai, Hongbin Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Shen, Weifeng Lin, Jinxiu Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special emphases on comparing the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations by synthesizing published clinical trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Articles were identified by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases before September 2013, by reviewing the bibliographies of eligible reports, and by consulting with experts in this field. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. There were respectively 469 and 635 patients referred for cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations from 14 qualified clinical trials. Overall analyses indicated that cryoballoon ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and total procedure time by a weighted mean of 14.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.82 to 25.45; P = 0.014) minutes and 29.65 (95% CI: 8.54 to 50.77; P = 0.006) minutes compared with radiofrequency ablation, respectively, whereas ablation time in cryoballoon ablation was nonsignificantly elongated by a weighted mean of 11.66 (95% CI: −10.71 to 34.04; P = 0.307) minutes. Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation had a high yet nonsignificant success rate of catheter ablation compared with cryoballoon ablation (odds ratio; 95% CI; P: 1.34; 0.53 to 3.36; 0.538), and cryoballoon ablation was also found to be associated with the relatively low risk of having recurrent atrial fibrillation (0.75; 0.3 to 1.88; 0.538) and major complications (0.46; 0.11 to 1.83; 0.269). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity and low probability of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate greater improvement in fluoroscopic time and total procedure duration for atrial fibrillation patients referred for cryoballoon ablation than those for radiofrequency ablation. Public Library of Science 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3938670/ /pubmed/24587324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323 Text en © 2014 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Junxia
Huang, Yingqun
Cai, Hongbin
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Shen, Weifeng
Lin, Jinxiu
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title_full Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title_short Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
title_sort is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323
work_keys_str_mv AT xujunxia iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT huangyingqun iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT caihongbin iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT qiyue iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT jianan iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT shenweifeng iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT linjinxiu iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT pengfeng iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis
AT niuwenquan iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis