Cargando…
Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special empha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323 |
_version_ | 1782305635461758976 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Junxia Huang, Yingqun Cai, Hongbin Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Shen, Weifeng Lin, Jinxiu Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan |
author_facet | Xu, Junxia Huang, Yingqun Cai, Hongbin Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Shen, Weifeng Lin, Jinxiu Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan |
author_sort | Xu, Junxia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special emphases on comparing the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations by synthesizing published clinical trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Articles were identified by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases before September 2013, by reviewing the bibliographies of eligible reports, and by consulting with experts in this field. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. There were respectively 469 and 635 patients referred for cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations from 14 qualified clinical trials. Overall analyses indicated that cryoballoon ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and total procedure time by a weighted mean of 14.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.82 to 25.45; P = 0.014) minutes and 29.65 (95% CI: 8.54 to 50.77; P = 0.006) minutes compared with radiofrequency ablation, respectively, whereas ablation time in cryoballoon ablation was nonsignificantly elongated by a weighted mean of 11.66 (95% CI: −10.71 to 34.04; P = 0.307) minutes. Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation had a high yet nonsignificant success rate of catheter ablation compared with cryoballoon ablation (odds ratio; 95% CI; P: 1.34; 0.53 to 3.36; 0.538), and cryoballoon ablation was also found to be associated with the relatively low risk of having recurrent atrial fibrillation (0.75; 0.3 to 1.88; 0.538) and major complications (0.46; 0.11 to 1.83; 0.269). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity and low probability of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate greater improvement in fluoroscopic time and total procedure duration for atrial fibrillation patients referred for cryoballoon ablation than those for radiofrequency ablation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3938670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39386702014-03-04 Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis Xu, Junxia Huang, Yingqun Cai, Hongbin Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Shen, Weifeng Lin, Jinxiu Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special emphases on comparing the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations by synthesizing published clinical trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Articles were identified by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases before September 2013, by reviewing the bibliographies of eligible reports, and by consulting with experts in this field. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. There were respectively 469 and 635 patients referred for cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations from 14 qualified clinical trials. Overall analyses indicated that cryoballoon ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and total procedure time by a weighted mean of 14.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.82 to 25.45; P = 0.014) minutes and 29.65 (95% CI: 8.54 to 50.77; P = 0.006) minutes compared with radiofrequency ablation, respectively, whereas ablation time in cryoballoon ablation was nonsignificantly elongated by a weighted mean of 11.66 (95% CI: −10.71 to 34.04; P = 0.307) minutes. Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation had a high yet nonsignificant success rate of catheter ablation compared with cryoballoon ablation (odds ratio; 95% CI; P: 1.34; 0.53 to 3.36; 0.538), and cryoballoon ablation was also found to be associated with the relatively low risk of having recurrent atrial fibrillation (0.75; 0.3 to 1.88; 0.538) and major complications (0.46; 0.11 to 1.83; 0.269). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity and low probability of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate greater improvement in fluoroscopic time and total procedure duration for atrial fibrillation patients referred for cryoballoon ablation than those for radiofrequency ablation. Public Library of Science 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3938670/ /pubmed/24587324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323 Text en © 2014 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Junxia Huang, Yingqun Cai, Hongbin Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Shen, Weifeng Lin, Jinxiu Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title | Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24587324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujunxia iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT huangyingqun iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT caihongbin iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT qiyue iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT jianan iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT shenweifeng iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT linjinxiu iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT pengfeng iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis AT niuwenquan iscryoballoonablationpreferabletoradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofatrialfibrillationbypulmonaryveinisolationametaanalysis |