Cargando…

The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?

BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal surgeons have been slow to adopt the use of spectral filters for endoillumination to reduce retinal light toxicity. This study shows that spectral filters can be used without a loss in color contrast during brilliant blue G chromovitrectomy. METHODS: To evaluate the influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henrich, Paul B., Valmaggia, Christophe, Lang, Corina, Cattin, Philippe C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24013579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2461-x
_version_ 1782305684666187776
author Henrich, Paul B.
Valmaggia, Christophe
Lang, Corina
Cattin, Philippe C.
author_facet Henrich, Paul B.
Valmaggia, Christophe
Lang, Corina
Cattin, Philippe C.
author_sort Henrich, Paul B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal surgeons have been slow to adopt the use of spectral filters for endoillumination to reduce retinal light toxicity. This study shows that spectral filters can be used without a loss in color contrast during brilliant blue G chromovitrectomy. METHODS: To evaluate the influence of intra operative spectral light filters on perceivable contrast during Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy, a prospective, observational clinical study was carried out on 59 consecutive Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy interventions in 59 patients admitted for macular holes, macular pucker or vitreomacular traction syndromes. Subsequent to peeling of the internal limiting membrane, six different illumination modes were enabled consecutively: mercury vapor, mercury vapor/xenon, and xenon followed by xenon combined with an amber, green or yellow spectral filter. Main outcome measure was the chromaticity spread between stained internal limiting membrane and unstained retina as a measure for the color contrast perceived by the human eye. RESULTS: Mean chromaticity scores were similar for all light sources: mercury vapor 7.97, mercury vapor/xenon 7.96 (p = 0.96), and xenon 7.41 (p = 0.55). Compared to xenon, the additional use of endoillumination spectral filters did not change contrast recognizability: Chromaticity scores were 9.38 for the amber filter (p = 0.13), 6.63 for the green and 7.02 for the yellow filter (p = 0.37 and 0.64, respectively). When comparing the different filters head-to-head, the amber filter was superior to the green filter (p = 0.03), while the yellow was intermediate and not significantly different from either the amber (p = 0.08) or the green filter (p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Color contrast perceptibility during Brilliant Blue G assisted chromovitrectomy is similar with mercury vapor, mercury vapor/xenon or xenon light sources. Spectral filters do not decrease color contrast recognizability. Head-to-head comparison shows a significant advantage for the amber over the green filter with respect to contrast generation, the yellow filter is intermediate. As spectral filters are known to greatly reduce retinal light toxicity, we suggest donor eye studies to validate whether the amber filter should be generally recommended for Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3939013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39390132014-03-06 The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy? Henrich, Paul B. Valmaggia, Christophe Lang, Corina Cattin, Philippe C. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Retinal Disorders BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal surgeons have been slow to adopt the use of spectral filters for endoillumination to reduce retinal light toxicity. This study shows that spectral filters can be used without a loss in color contrast during brilliant blue G chromovitrectomy. METHODS: To evaluate the influence of intra operative spectral light filters on perceivable contrast during Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy, a prospective, observational clinical study was carried out on 59 consecutive Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy interventions in 59 patients admitted for macular holes, macular pucker or vitreomacular traction syndromes. Subsequent to peeling of the internal limiting membrane, six different illumination modes were enabled consecutively: mercury vapor, mercury vapor/xenon, and xenon followed by xenon combined with an amber, green or yellow spectral filter. Main outcome measure was the chromaticity spread between stained internal limiting membrane and unstained retina as a measure for the color contrast perceived by the human eye. RESULTS: Mean chromaticity scores were similar for all light sources: mercury vapor 7.97, mercury vapor/xenon 7.96 (p = 0.96), and xenon 7.41 (p = 0.55). Compared to xenon, the additional use of endoillumination spectral filters did not change contrast recognizability: Chromaticity scores were 9.38 for the amber filter (p = 0.13), 6.63 for the green and 7.02 for the yellow filter (p = 0.37 and 0.64, respectively). When comparing the different filters head-to-head, the amber filter was superior to the green filter (p = 0.03), while the yellow was intermediate and not significantly different from either the amber (p = 0.08) or the green filter (p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Color contrast perceptibility during Brilliant Blue G assisted chromovitrectomy is similar with mercury vapor, mercury vapor/xenon or xenon light sources. Spectral filters do not decrease color contrast recognizability. Head-to-head comparison shows a significant advantage for the amber over the green filter with respect to contrast generation, the yellow filter is intermediate. As spectral filters are known to greatly reduce retinal light toxicity, we suggest donor eye studies to validate whether the amber filter should be generally recommended for Brilliant Blue G chromovitrectomy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-09-08 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3939013/ /pubmed/24013579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2461-x Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Retinal Disorders
Henrich, Paul B.
Valmaggia, Christophe
Lang, Corina
Cattin, Philippe C.
The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title_full The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title_fullStr The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title_full_unstemmed The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title_short The price for reduced light toxicity: Do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during Brilliant Blue G–assisted chromovitrectomy?
title_sort price for reduced light toxicity: do endoilluminator spectral filters decrease color contrast during brilliant blue g–assisted chromovitrectomy?
topic Retinal Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24013579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2461-x
work_keys_str_mv AT henrichpaulb thepriceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT valmaggiachristophe thepriceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT langcorina thepriceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT cattinphilippec thepriceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT henrichpaulb priceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT valmaggiachristophe priceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT langcorina priceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy
AT cattinphilippec priceforreducedlighttoxicitydoendoilluminatorspectralfiltersdecreasecolorcontrastduringbrilliantbluegassistedchromovitrectomy