Cargando…

Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?

BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a range of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by social communication deficits, repetitive behaviours, and restrictive interests. Impaired inhibition has been suggested to exacerbate the core symptoms of ASD. This is particularly critical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vara, Anji S, Pang, Elizabeth W, Doyle-Thomas, Krissy AR, Vidal, Julie, Taylor, Margot J, Anagnostou, Evdokia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-5-6
_version_ 1782305701493735424
author Vara, Anji S
Pang, Elizabeth W
Doyle-Thomas, Krissy AR
Vidal, Julie
Taylor, Margot J
Anagnostou, Evdokia
author_facet Vara, Anji S
Pang, Elizabeth W
Doyle-Thomas, Krissy AR
Vidal, Julie
Taylor, Margot J
Anagnostou, Evdokia
author_sort Vara, Anji S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a range of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by social communication deficits, repetitive behaviours, and restrictive interests. Impaired inhibition has been suggested to exacerbate the core symptoms of ASD. This is particularly critical during adolescence when social skills are maturing to adult levels. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we identified the location and timing pattern of neural activity associated with inhibition in adolescents with autism, compared to typically developing adolescents. METHODS: The MEG data from 15 adolescents with ASD and 15 age-matched controls (13 to 17 years) were collected during a go/no-go task with inverse ratios of go/no-go trials in two conditions: an inhibition condition (1:2) and a baseline condition (2:1). No-go trials from the two conditions were analyzed using beamformer source localizations from 200 ms to 400 ms post-stimulus onset. Significant activations were determined using permutation testing. RESULTS: Adolescents with ASD recruited first the right middle frontal gyrus (200 to 250 ms) followed by the left postcentral gyrus (250 to 300 ms) and finally the left middle frontal and right medial frontal gyri (300 to 400 ms). Typically developing adolescents recruited first the left middle frontal gyrus (200 to 250 ms), followed by the left superior and inferior frontal gyri (250 to 300 ms), then the right middle temporal gyrus (300 to 350 ms), and finally the superior and precentral gyri and right inferior lobule (300 to 400 ms). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with ASD showed recruitment limited largely to the frontal cortex unlike typically developing adolescents who recruited parietal and temporal regions as well. These findings support the presence of an atypical, restricted inhibitory network in adolescents with ASD compared to controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3939401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39394012014-03-04 Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder? Vara, Anji S Pang, Elizabeth W Doyle-Thomas, Krissy AR Vidal, Julie Taylor, Margot J Anagnostou, Evdokia Mol Autism Research BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a range of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by social communication deficits, repetitive behaviours, and restrictive interests. Impaired inhibition has been suggested to exacerbate the core symptoms of ASD. This is particularly critical during adolescence when social skills are maturing to adult levels. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we identified the location and timing pattern of neural activity associated with inhibition in adolescents with autism, compared to typically developing adolescents. METHODS: The MEG data from 15 adolescents with ASD and 15 age-matched controls (13 to 17 years) were collected during a go/no-go task with inverse ratios of go/no-go trials in two conditions: an inhibition condition (1:2) and a baseline condition (2:1). No-go trials from the two conditions were analyzed using beamformer source localizations from 200 ms to 400 ms post-stimulus onset. Significant activations were determined using permutation testing. RESULTS: Adolescents with ASD recruited first the right middle frontal gyrus (200 to 250 ms) followed by the left postcentral gyrus (250 to 300 ms) and finally the left middle frontal and right medial frontal gyri (300 to 400 ms). Typically developing adolescents recruited first the left middle frontal gyrus (200 to 250 ms), followed by the left superior and inferior frontal gyri (250 to 300 ms), then the right middle temporal gyrus (300 to 350 ms), and finally the superior and precentral gyri and right inferior lobule (300 to 400 ms). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with ASD showed recruitment limited largely to the frontal cortex unlike typically developing adolescents who recruited parietal and temporal regions as well. These findings support the presence of an atypical, restricted inhibitory network in adolescents with ASD compared to controls. BioMed Central 2014-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3939401/ /pubmed/24485230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-5-6 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vara, Anji S
Pang, Elizabeth W
Doyle-Thomas, Krissy AR
Vidal, Julie
Taylor, Margot J
Anagnostou, Evdokia
Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title_full Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title_fullStr Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title_full_unstemmed Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title_short Is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
title_sort is inhibitory control a ‘no-go’ in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-5-6
work_keys_str_mv AT varaanjis isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder
AT pangelizabethw isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder
AT doylethomaskrissyar isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder
AT vidaljulie isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder
AT taylormargotj isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder
AT anagnostouevdokia isinhibitorycontrolanogoinadolescentswithautismspectrumdisorder