Cargando…

A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the equivalence between blood collection methods using direct venous puncture (DVP) and a peripheral venous catheter or cannula (PVC). DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of simple crossover design with within-subject measures carried out between October 2011 and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat, Busquets-Puigdevall, Teresa, Díaz-Bergara, Maribel, Paguina-Marcos, Marta, Sánchez-Pérez, Inma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250
_version_ 1782305725936041984
author Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat
Busquets-Puigdevall, Teresa
Díaz-Bergara, Maribel
Paguina-Marcos, Marta
Sánchez-Pérez, Inma
author_facet Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat
Busquets-Puigdevall, Teresa
Díaz-Bergara, Maribel
Paguina-Marcos, Marta
Sánchez-Pérez, Inma
author_sort Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the equivalence between blood collection methods using direct venous puncture (DVP) and a peripheral venous catheter or cannula (PVC). DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of simple crossover design with within-subject measures carried out between October 2011 and May 2012 at a regional hospital in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 272 patients aged 18 or older hospitalised or admitted to the short-stay unit (SSU) who required laboratory testing and PVC to administer saline solution, intravenous fluid therapy and/or intravenous medication. Excluded were those with PVC collection time exceeding 20 s, difficulty of venoclysis, or who presented with arteriovenous fistula, language difficulties, in critical condition or altered consciousness with no family to consent. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 variables were recorded for DVP and PVC, along with age, sex, diagnosis, vein location for DVP, location of the PVC, PVC calibre, saline syringe, intravenous fluid therapy, medication, haemolysis and clotted blood during DVP or PVC collection. Univariate analysis, Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (r(c)) and Bland-Altman's 95% agreement interval were provided. RESULTS: Included in the study were 272 patients, primarily aged 65 or older (80.9%), males (52.6%) and receiving intermittent medication (43.4%). Values obtained with both methods showed a positive linear association, being moderate for pO(2) (r=0.405) and very high for all others (r>0.86). Levels were concordant (r(c)≥0.9), except for calcium (r(c)=0.860), pH (r(c)=0.853), pCO(2) (r(c)=0.843) and pO(2) (r(c)=0.336) and equivalent for all determinations except pCO(2) and pO(2), where clinically significant differences were found in more than 9% of cases (21.2%, 95% CI 16.6% to 26.5% and 73.1%, 95% CI 67.4% to 78.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood collection methods using DVP and PVC can be used interchangeably for most routine laboratory tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3939659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39396592014-03-03 A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat Busquets-Puigdevall, Teresa Díaz-Bergara, Maribel Paguina-Marcos, Marta Sánchez-Pérez, Inma BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the equivalence between blood collection methods using direct venous puncture (DVP) and a peripheral venous catheter or cannula (PVC). DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of simple crossover design with within-subject measures carried out between October 2011 and May 2012 at a regional hospital in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 272 patients aged 18 or older hospitalised or admitted to the short-stay unit (SSU) who required laboratory testing and PVC to administer saline solution, intravenous fluid therapy and/or intravenous medication. Excluded were those with PVC collection time exceeding 20 s, difficulty of venoclysis, or who presented with arteriovenous fistula, language difficulties, in critical condition or altered consciousness with no family to consent. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 variables were recorded for DVP and PVC, along with age, sex, diagnosis, vein location for DVP, location of the PVC, PVC calibre, saline syringe, intravenous fluid therapy, medication, haemolysis and clotted blood during DVP or PVC collection. Univariate analysis, Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (r(c)) and Bland-Altman's 95% agreement interval were provided. RESULTS: Included in the study were 272 patients, primarily aged 65 or older (80.9%), males (52.6%) and receiving intermittent medication (43.4%). Values obtained with both methods showed a positive linear association, being moderate for pO(2) (r=0.405) and very high for all others (r>0.86). Levels were concordant (r(c)≥0.9), except for calcium (r(c)=0.860), pH (r(c)=0.853), pCO(2) (r(c)=0.843) and pO(2) (r(c)=0.336) and equivalent for all determinations except pCO(2) and pO(2), where clinically significant differences were found in more than 9% of cases (21.2%, 95% CI 16.6% to 26.5% and 73.1%, 95% CI 67.4% to 78.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood collection methods using DVP and PVC can be used interchangeably for most routine laboratory tests. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3939659/ /pubmed/24578539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Ortells-Abuye, Nativitat
Busquets-Puigdevall, Teresa
Díaz-Bergara, Maribel
Paguina-Marcos, Marta
Sánchez-Pérez, Inma
A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title_full A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title_short A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
title_sort cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250
work_keys_str_mv AT ortellsabuyenativitat acrosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT busquetspuigdevallteresa acrosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT diazbergaramaribel acrosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT paguinamarcosmarta acrosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT sanchezperezinma acrosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT ortellsabuyenativitat crosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT busquetspuigdevallteresa crosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT diazbergaramaribel crosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT paguinamarcosmarta crosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter
AT sanchezperezinma crosssectionalstudytocomparetwobloodcollectionmethodsdirectvenouspunctureandperipheralvenouscatheter