Cargando…

Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of self-reported hysterectomy against the gold standard of uterine visualisation using pelvic ultrasound. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) based in 13 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in En...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Taylor, Henry, Kalsi, Jatinderpal, Ryan, Andy, Burnell, Matthew, Sharma, Aarti, Apostolidou, Sophia, Campbell, Stuart, Jacobs, Ian, Menon, Usha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004421
_version_ 1782305727352668160
author Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Taylor, Henry
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Ryan, Andy
Burnell, Matthew
Sharma, Aarti
Apostolidou, Sophia
Campbell, Stuart
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
author_facet Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Taylor, Henry
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Ryan, Andy
Burnell, Matthew
Sharma, Aarti
Apostolidou, Sophia
Campbell, Stuart
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
author_sort Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of self-reported hysterectomy against the gold standard of uterine visualisation using pelvic ultrasound. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) based in 13 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Between April 2001 and October 2005, 48 215 postmenopausal women aged 50–74 randomised to the ultrasound screening arm of UKCTOCS underwent the first (initial) scan on the trial. INTERVENTIONS: At recruitment, the women completed a recruitment questionnaire (RQ) which included previous hysterectomy. The sonographer asked each woman regarding previous hysterectomy (interview format, IF) prior to the scan. At the scan, in addition to ovarian morphology, endometrial thickness (ET)/endometrial abnormality were captured if the uterus was visualised at the scan. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported hysterectomy at RQ or IF was compared to ultrasound data on ET/endometrial abnormality (as surrogate uterine visualisation markers) on the first (initial) scan. RESULTS: Of 48 215 women, 3 had congenital uterine agenesis and 218 inconclusive results. The uterus was visualised in 39 121 women. 8871 self-reported hysterectomy at RQ, 8641 at IF and 8487 at both. The uterus was visualised in 39 123, 39 353 and 38 969 women not self-reporting hysterectomy at RQ, IF or both. Validity, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of using RQ alone, IF or both RQ/IF were 99.6%, 98.9%, 99.7%, 98.9% and 99.7%; 98.9%, 98.4%, 99.1%, 95.9% and 99.7%; 99.8%, 99.6%, 99.9%, 99.4% and 99.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported hysterectomy is a highly accurate and valid source for studying long-term associations of hysterectomy with disease onset. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN)—22488978
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3939665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39396652014-03-03 Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Taylor, Henry Kalsi, Jatinderpal Ryan, Andy Burnell, Matthew Sharma, Aarti Apostolidou, Sophia Campbell, Stuart Jacobs, Ian Menon, Usha BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of self-reported hysterectomy against the gold standard of uterine visualisation using pelvic ultrasound. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) based in 13 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Between April 2001 and October 2005, 48 215 postmenopausal women aged 50–74 randomised to the ultrasound screening arm of UKCTOCS underwent the first (initial) scan on the trial. INTERVENTIONS: At recruitment, the women completed a recruitment questionnaire (RQ) which included previous hysterectomy. The sonographer asked each woman regarding previous hysterectomy (interview format, IF) prior to the scan. At the scan, in addition to ovarian morphology, endometrial thickness (ET)/endometrial abnormality were captured if the uterus was visualised at the scan. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported hysterectomy at RQ or IF was compared to ultrasound data on ET/endometrial abnormality (as surrogate uterine visualisation markers) on the first (initial) scan. RESULTS: Of 48 215 women, 3 had congenital uterine agenesis and 218 inconclusive results. The uterus was visualised in 39 121 women. 8871 self-reported hysterectomy at RQ, 8641 at IF and 8487 at both. The uterus was visualised in 39 123, 39 353 and 38 969 women not self-reporting hysterectomy at RQ, IF or both. Validity, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of using RQ alone, IF or both RQ/IF were 99.6%, 98.9%, 99.7%, 98.9% and 99.7%; 98.9%, 98.4%, 99.1%, 95.9% and 99.7%; 99.8%, 99.6%, 99.9%, 99.4% and 99.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported hysterectomy is a highly accurate and valid source for studying long-term associations of hysterectomy with disease onset. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN)—22488978 BMJ Publishing Group 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3939665/ /pubmed/24589827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004421 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Taylor, Henry
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Ryan, Andy
Burnell, Matthew
Sharma, Aarti
Apostolidou, Sophia
Campbell, Stuart
Jacobs, Ian
Menon, Usha
Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title_full Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title_fullStr Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title_full_unstemmed Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title_short Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
title_sort validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the uk collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (ukctocs)
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004421
work_keys_str_mv AT gentrymaharajaleksandra validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT taylorhenry validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT kalsijatinderpal validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT ryanandy validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT burnellmatthew validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT sharmaaarti validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT apostolidousophia validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT campbellstuart validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT jacobsian validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs
AT menonusha validityofselfreportedhysterectomyaprospectivecohortstudywithintheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningukctocs