Cargando…

Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors

BACKGROUND: Quantification of molecular cell processes is important for prognostication and treatment individualization of head and neck cancer (HNC). However, individual tumor comparison can show discord in upregulation similarities when analyzing multiple biological mechanisms. Elaborate tumor cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoeben, Bianca AW, Starmans, Maud HW, Leijenaar, Ralph TH, Dubois, Ludwig J, van der Kogel, Albert J, Kaanders, Johannes HAM, Boutros, Paul C, Lambin, Philippe, Bussink, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-130
_version_ 1782305777766105088
author Hoeben, Bianca AW
Starmans, Maud HW
Leijenaar, Ralph TH
Dubois, Ludwig J
van der Kogel, Albert J
Kaanders, Johannes HAM
Boutros, Paul C
Lambin, Philippe
Bussink, Johan
author_facet Hoeben, Bianca AW
Starmans, Maud HW
Leijenaar, Ralph TH
Dubois, Ludwig J
van der Kogel, Albert J
Kaanders, Johannes HAM
Boutros, Paul C
Lambin, Philippe
Bussink, Johan
author_sort Hoeben, Bianca AW
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantification of molecular cell processes is important for prognostication and treatment individualization of head and neck cancer (HNC). However, individual tumor comparison can show discord in upregulation similarities when analyzing multiple biological mechanisms. Elaborate tumor characterization, integrating multiple pathways reflecting intrinsic and microenvironmental properties, may be beneficial to group most uniform tumors for treatment modification schemes. The goal of this study was to systematically analyze if immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of molecular markers, involved in treatment resistance, and (18)F-FDG PET parameters could accurately distinguish separate HNC tumors. METHODS: Several imaging parameters and texture features for (18)F-FDG small-animal PET and immunohistochemical markers related to metabolism, hypoxia, proliferation and tumor blood perfusion were assessed within groups of BALB/c nu/nu mice xenografted with 14 human HNC models. Classification methods were used to predict tumor line based on sets of parameters. RESULTS: We found that (18)F-FDG PET could not differentiate between the tumor lines. On the contrary, combined IHC parameters could accurately allocate individual tumors to the correct model. From 9 analyzed IHC parameters, a cluster of 6 random parameters already classified 70.3% correctly. Combining all PET/IHC characteristics resulted in the highest tumor line classification accuracy (81.0%; cross validation 82.0%), which was just 2.2% higher (p = 5.2×10(-32)) than the performance of the IHC parameter/feature based model. CONCLUSIONS: With a select set of IHC markers representing cellular processes of metabolism, proliferation, hypoxia and perfusion, one can reliably distinguish between HNC tumor lines. Addition of (18)F-FDG PET improves classification accuracy of IHC to a significant yet minor degree. These results may form a basis for development of tumor characterization models for treatment allocation purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3940254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39402542014-03-12 Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors Hoeben, Bianca AW Starmans, Maud HW Leijenaar, Ralph TH Dubois, Ludwig J van der Kogel, Albert J Kaanders, Johannes HAM Boutros, Paul C Lambin, Philippe Bussink, Johan BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Quantification of molecular cell processes is important for prognostication and treatment individualization of head and neck cancer (HNC). However, individual tumor comparison can show discord in upregulation similarities when analyzing multiple biological mechanisms. Elaborate tumor characterization, integrating multiple pathways reflecting intrinsic and microenvironmental properties, may be beneficial to group most uniform tumors for treatment modification schemes. The goal of this study was to systematically analyze if immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of molecular markers, involved in treatment resistance, and (18)F-FDG PET parameters could accurately distinguish separate HNC tumors. METHODS: Several imaging parameters and texture features for (18)F-FDG small-animal PET and immunohistochemical markers related to metabolism, hypoxia, proliferation and tumor blood perfusion were assessed within groups of BALB/c nu/nu mice xenografted with 14 human HNC models. Classification methods were used to predict tumor line based on sets of parameters. RESULTS: We found that (18)F-FDG PET could not differentiate between the tumor lines. On the contrary, combined IHC parameters could accurately allocate individual tumors to the correct model. From 9 analyzed IHC parameters, a cluster of 6 random parameters already classified 70.3% correctly. Combining all PET/IHC characteristics resulted in the highest tumor line classification accuracy (81.0%; cross validation 82.0%), which was just 2.2% higher (p = 5.2×10(-32)) than the performance of the IHC parameter/feature based model. CONCLUSIONS: With a select set of IHC markers representing cellular processes of metabolism, proliferation, hypoxia and perfusion, one can reliably distinguish between HNC tumor lines. Addition of (18)F-FDG PET improves classification accuracy of IHC to a significant yet minor degree. These results may form a basis for development of tumor characterization models for treatment allocation purposes. BioMed Central 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3940254/ /pubmed/24571588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-130 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hoeben et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoeben, Bianca AW
Starmans, Maud HW
Leijenaar, Ralph TH
Dubois, Ludwig J
van der Kogel, Albert J
Kaanders, Johannes HAM
Boutros, Paul C
Lambin, Philippe
Bussink, Johan
Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title_full Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title_fullStr Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title_full_unstemmed Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title_short Systematic analysis of (18)F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
title_sort systematic analysis of (18)f-fdg pet and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-130
work_keys_str_mv AT hoebenbiancaaw systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT starmansmaudhw systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT leijenaarralphth systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT duboisludwigj systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT vanderkogelalbertj systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT kaandersjohannesham systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT boutrospaulc systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT lambinphilippe systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors
AT bussinkjohan systematicanalysisof18ffdgpetandmetabolismproliferationandhypoxiamarkersforclassificationofheadandnecktumors