Cargando…
Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model?
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Research has increasingly suggested that gut flora plays an important role in the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). Studies of the curative effect of probiotics for IBS have usually been positive but not always. However, the differences of treatme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24595218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090153 |
_version_ | 1782305821206511616 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Huan Gong, Jing Wang, Wenfeng Long, Yanqin Fu, Xiaochao Fu, Yu Qian, Wei Hou, Xiaohua |
author_facet | Wang, Huan Gong, Jing Wang, Wenfeng Long, Yanqin Fu, Xiaochao Fu, Yu Qian, Wei Hou, Xiaohua |
author_sort | Wang, Huan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Research has increasingly suggested that gut flora plays an important role in the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). Studies of the curative effect of probiotics for IBS have usually been positive but not always. However, the differences of treatment effects and mechanisms among probiotic stains, or mixture of them, are not clear. In this study, we compared the effects of different probiotics (Befidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus or mixture of the three) on intestinal sensation, barrier function and intestinal immunity in PI-IBS mouse model. METHODS: PI-IBS model was induced by Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Different probiotics were administered to mice after 8 weeks infection. Visceral sensitivity was measured by scores of abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) and the threshold intensity of colorectal distention. Colonic smooth muscle contractile response was assessed by contraction of the longitudinal muscle strips. Plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) and d-lactate were determined by an enzymatic spectrophotometry. Expression of tight junction proteins and cytokines in ileum were measured by Western blotting. RESULTS: Compared to control mice, PI-IBS mice treated either alone with Befidobacterium or Lactobacillus (but not Streptococcus), or the mixture of the three exhibited not only decreased AWR score and contractile response, but also reduced plasma DAO and D-lactate. These probiotic treatments also suppressed the expression of proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and IL-17 and promoted the expression of major tight junction proteins claudin-1 and occludin. The mixture of the three probiotic strains performed better than the individual in up-regulating these tight junction proteins and suppressing IL-17 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, but not Streptococcus, alleviated visceral hypersensitivity and recovered intestinal barrier function as well as inflammation in PI-IBS mouse model, which correlated with an increase of major tight junction proteins. In addition, Mixture of three species was indicated to be superior to a single one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3940848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39408482014-03-06 Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? Wang, Huan Gong, Jing Wang, Wenfeng Long, Yanqin Fu, Xiaochao Fu, Yu Qian, Wei Hou, Xiaohua PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Research has increasingly suggested that gut flora plays an important role in the development of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). Studies of the curative effect of probiotics for IBS have usually been positive but not always. However, the differences of treatment effects and mechanisms among probiotic stains, or mixture of them, are not clear. In this study, we compared the effects of different probiotics (Befidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus or mixture of the three) on intestinal sensation, barrier function and intestinal immunity in PI-IBS mouse model. METHODS: PI-IBS model was induced by Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Different probiotics were administered to mice after 8 weeks infection. Visceral sensitivity was measured by scores of abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) and the threshold intensity of colorectal distention. Colonic smooth muscle contractile response was assessed by contraction of the longitudinal muscle strips. Plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) and d-lactate were determined by an enzymatic spectrophotometry. Expression of tight junction proteins and cytokines in ileum were measured by Western blotting. RESULTS: Compared to control mice, PI-IBS mice treated either alone with Befidobacterium or Lactobacillus (but not Streptococcus), or the mixture of the three exhibited not only decreased AWR score and contractile response, but also reduced plasma DAO and D-lactate. These probiotic treatments also suppressed the expression of proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and IL-17 and promoted the expression of major tight junction proteins claudin-1 and occludin. The mixture of the three probiotic strains performed better than the individual in up-regulating these tight junction proteins and suppressing IL-17 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, but not Streptococcus, alleviated visceral hypersensitivity and recovered intestinal barrier function as well as inflammation in PI-IBS mouse model, which correlated with an increase of major tight junction proteins. In addition, Mixture of three species was indicated to be superior to a single one. Public Library of Science 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3940848/ /pubmed/24595218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090153 Text en © 2014 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Huan Gong, Jing Wang, Wenfeng Long, Yanqin Fu, Xiaochao Fu, Yu Qian, Wei Hou, Xiaohua Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title | Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title_full | Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title_fullStr | Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title_short | Are There Any Different Effects of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus on Intestinal Sensation, Barrier Function and Intestinal Immunity in PI-IBS Mouse Model? |
title_sort | are there any different effects of bifidobacterium, lactobacillus and streptococcus on intestinal sensation, barrier function and intestinal immunity in pi-ibs mouse model? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3940848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24595218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghuan arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT gongjing arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT wangwenfeng arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT longyanqin arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT fuxiaochao arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT fuyu arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT qianwei arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel AT houxiaohua arethereanydifferenteffectsofbifidobacteriumlactobacillusandstreptococcusonintestinalsensationbarrierfunctionandintestinalimmunityinpiibsmousemodel |