Cargando…

Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy

TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bleiziffer, S., Krane, M., Deutsch, M.A., Elhmidi, Y., Piazza, N., Voss, B., Lange, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326
_version_ 1782305866954833920
author Bleiziffer, S.
Krane, M.
Deutsch, M.A.
Elhmidi, Y.
Piazza, N.
Voss, B.
Lange, R.
author_facet Bleiziffer, S.
Krane, M.
Deutsch, M.A.
Elhmidi, Y.
Piazza, N.
Voss, B.
Lange, R.
author_sort Bleiziffer, S.
collection PubMed
description TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3941089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39410892014-11-01 Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy Bleiziffer, S. Krane, M. Deutsch, M.A. Elhmidi, Y. Piazza, N. Voss, B. Lange, R. Curr Cardiol Rev Article TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics. Bentham Science Publishers 2013-11 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3941089/ /pubmed/24313647 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326 Text en © 2013 Bentham Science Publishers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Bleiziffer, S.
Krane, M.
Deutsch, M.A.
Elhmidi, Y.
Piazza, N.
Voss, B.
Lange, R.
Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title_full Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title_fullStr Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title_short Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
title_sort which way in? the necessity of multiple approaches to transcatheter valve therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326
work_keys_str_mv AT bleiziffers whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT kranem whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT deutschma whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT elhmidiy whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT piazzan whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT vossb whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy
AT langer whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy