Cargando…
Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy
TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326 |
_version_ | 1782305866954833920 |
---|---|
author | Bleiziffer, S. Krane, M. Deutsch, M.A. Elhmidi, Y. Piazza, N. Voss, B. Lange, R. |
author_facet | Bleiziffer, S. Krane, M. Deutsch, M.A. Elhmidi, Y. Piazza, N. Voss, B. Lange, R. |
author_sort | Bleiziffer, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3941089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39410892014-11-01 Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy Bleiziffer, S. Krane, M. Deutsch, M.A. Elhmidi, Y. Piazza, N. Voss, B. Lange, R. Curr Cardiol Rev Article TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is a less invasive treatment of the stenotic aortic valve while avoiding midline sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A crimped biological valve on a self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent is inserted antegradely or retrogradely under fluoroscopy, and deployed on the beating heart. Among the worldwide TAVI programs, many different concepts have been established for the choice of the access site. Whether retrograde or antegrade TAVI should be considered the superior approach is matter of an ongoing debate. The published literature demonstrates safety of all techniques if performed within a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Since there is no data providing evidence if one approach is superior to another, we conclude that an individualized patient-centered decision making process is most beneficial, taking advantage of the complementarity of the different access options. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current practice of access techniques for transcatheter based valve treatment and to outline the respective special characteristics. Bentham Science Publishers 2013-11 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3941089/ /pubmed/24313647 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326 Text en © 2013 Bentham Science Publishers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Bleiziffer, S. Krane, M. Deutsch, M.A. Elhmidi, Y. Piazza, N. Voss, B. Lange, R. Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title_full | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title_fullStr | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title_short | Which way in? The Necessity of Multiple Approaches to Transcatheter Valve Therapy |
title_sort | which way in? the necessity of multiple approaches to transcatheter valve therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313647 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X09666131202123326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bleiziffers whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT kranem whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT deutschma whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT elhmidiy whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT piazzan whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT vossb whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy AT langer whichwayinthenecessityofmultipleapproachestotranscathetervalvetherapy |