Cargando…
A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight
Background: Abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameters (BPD) and femoral length (FL) are now the main parameters used to obtain estimated fetal weight (EFW). Although the role of soft tissue parameters in determining fetal weight was proved but clinical attention to mid-thigh soft tissue thi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
2013
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639719 |
_version_ | 1782305910737076224 |
---|---|
author | Kalantari, Mojgan Negahdari, Arezou Roknsharifi, Shima Qorbani, Mostafa |
author_facet | Kalantari, Mojgan Negahdari, Arezou Roknsharifi, Shima Qorbani, Mostafa |
author_sort | Kalantari, Mojgan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameters (BPD) and femoral length (FL) are now the main parameters used to obtain estimated fetal weight (EFW). Although the role of soft tissue parameters in determining fetal weight was proved but clinical attention to mid-thigh soft tissue thickness (STT) is limited. Objective: To find the impression of STT on birth weight (BW) and represent a new predictive formula. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen normal singleton term (36-42w) pregnancies with delivery within 72 hours were randomly selected to participate in this prospective cohort study. Variables measured by ultrasonography before birth included: AC, BPD, FL and STT. The actual neonatal BW was also measured after birth. Linear regression model was used and R square and p-value were reported. Results: The mean (SD) of BW was 3406 (405) gr. R square was best fit for the model that STT was added to AC, BPD, FL (r(2): 0.77). R square for the model using BPD, AC, FL and model using BPD, STT, FL was the same (r(2): 0.7). Best fit formula was Log (BW)= 2.461+0.003BPD+0.001AC+0.007STT+0.005FL. AC (R: 0.67, p<0.001), STT (R: 0.50, p<0.001), BPD (R: 0.59, p<0.001), FL (R: 0.66, p<0.001) were significantly correlated with birth weight. AC had also significant correlation with STT (p=0.001) Conclusion: This study showed adding STT to other variables in predictive models of fetal weight would provide a nice estimation (r(2)=0.77) and in cases that measuring AC is suboptimal STT may be a good replacement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3941391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Research and Clinical Center for Infertility |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39413912014-03-17 A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight Kalantari, Mojgan Negahdari, Arezou Roknsharifi, Shima Qorbani, Mostafa Iran J Reprod Med Background: Abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameters (BPD) and femoral length (FL) are now the main parameters used to obtain estimated fetal weight (EFW). Although the role of soft tissue parameters in determining fetal weight was proved but clinical attention to mid-thigh soft tissue thickness (STT) is limited. Objective: To find the impression of STT on birth weight (BW) and represent a new predictive formula. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen normal singleton term (36-42w) pregnancies with delivery within 72 hours were randomly selected to participate in this prospective cohort study. Variables measured by ultrasonography before birth included: AC, BPD, FL and STT. The actual neonatal BW was also measured after birth. Linear regression model was used and R square and p-value were reported. Results: The mean (SD) of BW was 3406 (405) gr. R square was best fit for the model that STT was added to AC, BPD, FL (r(2): 0.77). R square for the model using BPD, AC, FL and model using BPD, STT, FL was the same (r(2): 0.7). Best fit formula was Log (BW)= 2.461+0.003BPD+0.001AC+0.007STT+0.005FL. AC (R: 0.67, p<0.001), STT (R: 0.50, p<0.001), BPD (R: 0.59, p<0.001), FL (R: 0.66, p<0.001) were significantly correlated with birth weight. AC had also significant correlation with STT (p=0.001) Conclusion: This study showed adding STT to other variables in predictive models of fetal weight would provide a nice estimation (r(2)=0.77) and in cases that measuring AC is suboptimal STT may be a good replacement. Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3941391/ /pubmed/24639719 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Kalantari, Mojgan Negahdari, Arezou Roknsharifi, Shima Qorbani, Mostafa A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title | A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title_full | A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title_fullStr | A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title_full_unstemmed | A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title_short | A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
title_sort | new formula for estimating fetal weight: the impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalantarimojgan anewformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT negahdariarezou anewformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT roknsharifishima anewformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT qorbanimostafa anewformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT kalantarimojgan newformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT negahdariarezou newformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT roknsharifishima newformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight AT qorbanimostafa newformulaforestimatingfetalweighttheimpressionofbiparietaldiameterabdominalcircumferencemidthighsofttissuethicknessandfemorallengthonbirthweight |