Cargando…
Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare a neuroprotective effect of thoracic cord neuromodulation to that of sacral nerve neuromodulation in rat thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) model. METHODS: Twenty female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: the normal control grou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2013
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757451 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2013.10.1.14 |
_version_ | 1782305966982692864 |
---|---|
author | Hyun, Seung-Jae Lee, Chang-Hyun Kwon, Ji Woong Yoon, Cheol-Yong Lim, Jae-Young Kim, Ki-Jeong Jahng, Tae-Ahn Kim, Hyun-Jib |
author_facet | Hyun, Seung-Jae Lee, Chang-Hyun Kwon, Ji Woong Yoon, Cheol-Yong Lim, Jae-Young Kim, Ki-Jeong Jahng, Tae-Ahn Kim, Hyun-Jib |
author_sort | Hyun, Seung-Jae |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare a neuroprotective effect of thoracic cord neuromodulation to that of sacral nerve neuromodulation in rat thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) model. METHODS: Twenty female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: the normal control group (n=5), SCI with sham stimulation group (SCI, n=5), SCI with electrical stimulation at thoracic spinal cord (SCI + TES, n=5), and SCI with electrical stimulation at sacral nerve (SCI + SES, n=5). Spinal cord was injured by an impactor which dropped from 25mm height. Electrical stimulation was performed by the following protocol: pulse duration, 0.1ms; frequency, 20 Hz; stimulation time, 30 minutes; and stimulation duration at thoracic epidural space and S2 or 3 neural foramina for 4 weeks. Locomotor function, urodynamic study, muscle weights, and fiber cross sectional area (CSA) were investigated. RESULTS: All rats of the SCI + TES group expired within 3 days after the injury. The locomotor function of all survived rats improved over time but there was no significant difference between the SCI and the SCI + SES group. All rats experienced urinary retention after the injury and recovered self-voiding after 3-9 days. Voiding contraction interval was 25.5±7.5 minutes in the SCI group, 16.5±5.3 minutes in the SCI+SES group, and 12.5±4.2 minutes in the control group. The recovery of voiding contraction interval was significant in the SCI + SES group comparing to the SCI group (p<0.05). Muscle weight and CSA were slightly greater in the SCI + SES than in the SCI group, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: We failed to establish a rat spinal cord stimulation model. However, sacral neuromodulation have a therapeutic potential to improve neurogenic bladder and muscle atrophy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3941736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39417362014-04-22 Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model Hyun, Seung-Jae Lee, Chang-Hyun Kwon, Ji Woong Yoon, Cheol-Yong Lim, Jae-Young Kim, Ki-Jeong Jahng, Tae-Ahn Kim, Hyun-Jib Korean J Spine OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare a neuroprotective effect of thoracic cord neuromodulation to that of sacral nerve neuromodulation in rat thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) model. METHODS: Twenty female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: the normal control group (n=5), SCI with sham stimulation group (SCI, n=5), SCI with electrical stimulation at thoracic spinal cord (SCI + TES, n=5), and SCI with electrical stimulation at sacral nerve (SCI + SES, n=5). Spinal cord was injured by an impactor which dropped from 25mm height. Electrical stimulation was performed by the following protocol: pulse duration, 0.1ms; frequency, 20 Hz; stimulation time, 30 minutes; and stimulation duration at thoracic epidural space and S2 or 3 neural foramina for 4 weeks. Locomotor function, urodynamic study, muscle weights, and fiber cross sectional area (CSA) were investigated. RESULTS: All rats of the SCI + TES group expired within 3 days after the injury. The locomotor function of all survived rats improved over time but there was no significant difference between the SCI and the SCI + SES group. All rats experienced urinary retention after the injury and recovered self-voiding after 3-9 days. Voiding contraction interval was 25.5±7.5 minutes in the SCI group, 16.5±5.3 minutes in the SCI+SES group, and 12.5±4.2 minutes in the control group. The recovery of voiding contraction interval was significant in the SCI + SES group comparing to the SCI group (p<0.05). Muscle weight and CSA were slightly greater in the SCI + SES than in the SCI group, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: We failed to establish a rat spinal cord stimulation model. However, sacral neuromodulation have a therapeutic potential to improve neurogenic bladder and muscle atrophy. The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2013-03 2013-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3941736/ /pubmed/24757451 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2013.10.1.14 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Hyun, Seung-Jae Lee, Chang-Hyun Kwon, Ji Woong Yoon, Cheol-Yong Lim, Jae-Young Kim, Ki-Jeong Jahng, Tae-Ahn Kim, Hyun-Jib Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title | Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title_full | Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title_short | Comparative Analysis Between Thoracic Spinal Cord and Sacral Neuromodulation in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model: A Preliminary Report of a Rat Spinal Cord Stimulation Model |
title_sort | comparative analysis between thoracic spinal cord and sacral neuromodulation in a rat spinal cord injury model: a preliminary report of a rat spinal cord stimulation model |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757451 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2013.10.1.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyunseungjae comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT leechanghyun comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT kwonjiwoong comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT yooncheolyong comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT limjaeyoung comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT kimkijeong comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT jahngtaeahn comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel AT kimhyunjib comparativeanalysisbetweenthoracicspinalcordandsacralneuromodulationinaratspinalcordinjurymodelapreliminaryreportofaratspinalcordstimulationmodel |