Cargando…

Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s

BACKGROUND: Subjective burden is a central variable describing the situation encountered by family caregivers. The 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-short/BSFC-s) was developed to provide an economical measure of this variable. The present study examined the relia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graessel, Elmar, Berth, Hendrik, Lichte, Thomas, Grau, Hannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24555474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-23
_version_ 1782306012283273216
author Graessel, Elmar
Berth, Hendrik
Lichte, Thomas
Grau, Hannes
author_facet Graessel, Elmar
Berth, Hendrik
Lichte, Thomas
Grau, Hannes
author_sort Graessel, Elmar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Subjective burden is a central variable describing the situation encountered by family caregivers. The 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-short/BSFC-s) was developed to provide an economical measure of this variable. The present study examined the reliability and validity of the BSFC-s. METHODS: Comprehensive data from “the IDA project” were the basis of the calculations, which included 351 dyads and examined medical data on people with dementia, interview data from their family caregivers, and health insurance data. A factor analysis was performed to explore the structure of the BSFC-s; Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scale. The items were analyzed to determine the item difficulty and the discriminatory power. Construct validity was tested with five hypotheses. To establish the predictive validity of the BSFC-s, predictors of institutionalization at a follow-up time of 2.5 years were analyzed (binary logistic regression). RESULTS: The BSFC-s score adhered to a one-factor structure. Cronbach's alpha for the complete scale was .92. A significant increase in the BSFC-s score was observed when dementia progressed, disturbing behavior occurred more frequently, care requirements increased, and when caregivers were diagnosed with depression. Caregiver burden was the second strongest predictor of institutionalization out of a total of four significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: All hypotheses that referred to the construct validity were supported. The BSFC-short with its ten items is a very economical instrument for assessing the caregiver’s total subjective burden in a short time frame. The BSFC-s score has predictive validity for the institutionalization of people with dementia. Therefore it is an appropriate outcome measure to evaluate caregiver interventions. The scale is available for free in 20 languages (http://www.caregiver-burden.eu). This availability facilitates the comparison of international research findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3942019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39420192014-03-14 Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s Graessel, Elmar Berth, Hendrik Lichte, Thomas Grau, Hannes BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Subjective burden is a central variable describing the situation encountered by family caregivers. The 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-short/BSFC-s) was developed to provide an economical measure of this variable. The present study examined the reliability and validity of the BSFC-s. METHODS: Comprehensive data from “the IDA project” were the basis of the calculations, which included 351 dyads and examined medical data on people with dementia, interview data from their family caregivers, and health insurance data. A factor analysis was performed to explore the structure of the BSFC-s; Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scale. The items were analyzed to determine the item difficulty and the discriminatory power. Construct validity was tested with five hypotheses. To establish the predictive validity of the BSFC-s, predictors of institutionalization at a follow-up time of 2.5 years were analyzed (binary logistic regression). RESULTS: The BSFC-s score adhered to a one-factor structure. Cronbach's alpha for the complete scale was .92. A significant increase in the BSFC-s score was observed when dementia progressed, disturbing behavior occurred more frequently, care requirements increased, and when caregivers were diagnosed with depression. Caregiver burden was the second strongest predictor of institutionalization out of a total of four significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: All hypotheses that referred to the construct validity were supported. The BSFC-short with its ten items is a very economical instrument for assessing the caregiver’s total subjective burden in a short time frame. The BSFC-s score has predictive validity for the institutionalization of people with dementia. Therefore it is an appropriate outcome measure to evaluate caregiver interventions. The scale is available for free in 20 languages (http://www.caregiver-burden.eu). This availability facilitates the comparison of international research findings. BioMed Central 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3942019/ /pubmed/24555474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-23 Text en Copyright © 2014 Graessel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Graessel, Elmar
Berth, Hendrik
Lichte, Thomas
Grau, Hannes
Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title_full Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title_fullStr Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title_full_unstemmed Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title_short Subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers BSFC-s
title_sort subjective caregiver burden: validity of the 10-item short version of the burden scale for family caregivers bsfc-s
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24555474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-23
work_keys_str_mv AT graesselelmar subjectivecaregiverburdenvalidityofthe10itemshortversionoftheburdenscaleforfamilycaregiversbsfcs
AT berthhendrik subjectivecaregiverburdenvalidityofthe10itemshortversionoftheburdenscaleforfamilycaregiversbsfcs
AT lichtethomas subjectivecaregiverburdenvalidityofthe10itemshortversionoftheburdenscaleforfamilycaregiversbsfcs
AT grauhannes subjectivecaregiverburdenvalidityofthe10itemshortversionoftheburdenscaleforfamilycaregiversbsfcs