Cargando…
Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications
Even in the era of gene-expression profiling, the nodal status still remains the primary prognostic discriminant in breast cancer patients. The exclusion of node involvement using noninvasive methods could reduce the rate of axillary surgery, thereby preventing from suffering complications. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24672730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/469803 |
_version_ | 1782306050299396096 |
---|---|
author | Orsaria, Paolo Varvaras, Dimitrios Vanni, Gianluca Pagnani, Giampiero Scaggiante, Jacopo Frusone, Federico Granai, Alessandra Vittoria Petrella, Giuseppe Buonomo, Oreste Claudio |
author_facet | Orsaria, Paolo Varvaras, Dimitrios Vanni, Gianluca Pagnani, Giampiero Scaggiante, Jacopo Frusone, Federico Granai, Alessandra Vittoria Petrella, Giuseppe Buonomo, Oreste Claudio |
author_sort | Orsaria, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Even in the era of gene-expression profiling, the nodal status still remains the primary prognostic discriminant in breast cancer patients. The exclusion of node involvement using noninvasive methods could reduce the rate of axillary surgery, thereby preventing from suffering complications. However, lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is one of the most interesting recent developments in surgical oncology. Optimization of procedure could be implemented by dual mapping injection site skills, resection of all hot or blue nodes through tracer combination, and improvement in atypical drainage patterns mapping. This anatomical analysis suggests safety measures in patients with high probability of node metastasis through a renewed interest in surgical management. The perspective of a guided axillary sampling (GAS) could represent a potential development of recent anatomical and functional acquisitions, offering a dynamic technique shared according to clinical and anatomical disease parameters. Furthermore, the surgical staging procedures may adopt a conservative approach through the evaluation of upper arm lymphatics, thus defining a functional model aimed at the reduction of short- and long-term adverse events. Quality results in breast cancer surgery need to generate oncological safety devoid of complications through renewed clinical experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3942203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39422032014-03-26 Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications Orsaria, Paolo Varvaras, Dimitrios Vanni, Gianluca Pagnani, Giampiero Scaggiante, Jacopo Frusone, Federico Granai, Alessandra Vittoria Petrella, Giuseppe Buonomo, Oreste Claudio Int J Breast Cancer Review Article Even in the era of gene-expression profiling, the nodal status still remains the primary prognostic discriminant in breast cancer patients. The exclusion of node involvement using noninvasive methods could reduce the rate of axillary surgery, thereby preventing from suffering complications. However, lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is one of the most interesting recent developments in surgical oncology. Optimization of procedure could be implemented by dual mapping injection site skills, resection of all hot or blue nodes through tracer combination, and improvement in atypical drainage patterns mapping. This anatomical analysis suggests safety measures in patients with high probability of node metastasis through a renewed interest in surgical management. The perspective of a guided axillary sampling (GAS) could represent a potential development of recent anatomical and functional acquisitions, offering a dynamic technique shared according to clinical and anatomical disease parameters. Furthermore, the surgical staging procedures may adopt a conservative approach through the evaluation of upper arm lymphatics, thus defining a functional model aimed at the reduction of short- and long-term adverse events. Quality results in breast cancer surgery need to generate oncological safety devoid of complications through renewed clinical experience. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3942203/ /pubmed/24672730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/469803 Text en Copyright © 2014 Paolo Orsaria et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Orsaria, Paolo Varvaras, Dimitrios Vanni, Gianluca Pagnani, Giampiero Scaggiante, Jacopo Frusone, Federico Granai, Alessandra Vittoria Petrella, Giuseppe Buonomo, Oreste Claudio Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title | Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title_full | Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title_fullStr | Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title_short | Nodal Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: Strategies of Clinical Grounds and Quality of Life Implications |
title_sort | nodal status assessment in breast cancer: strategies of clinical grounds and quality of life implications |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24672730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/469803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orsariapaolo nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT varvarasdimitrios nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT vannigianluca nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT pagnanigiampiero nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT scaggiantejacopo nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT frusonefederico nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT granaialessandravittoria nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT petrellagiuseppe nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications AT buonomooresteclaudio nodalstatusassessmentinbreastcancerstrategiesofclinicalgroundsandqualityoflifeimplications |