Cargando…

Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft

Bone transplantation is frequently used for the treatment of large osseous defects. The availability of autologous bone grafts as the current biological gold standard is limited and there is a risk of donor site morbidity. Allogenic bone grafts are an appealing alternative, but disinfection should b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rauh, Juliane, Despang, Florian, Baas, Jorgen, Liebers, Cornelia, Pruss, Axel, Gelinsky, Michael, Günther, Klaus-Peter, Stiehler, Maik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24678514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784702
_version_ 1782479038654185472
author Rauh, Juliane
Despang, Florian
Baas, Jorgen
Liebers, Cornelia
Pruss, Axel
Gelinsky, Michael
Günther, Klaus-Peter
Stiehler, Maik
author_facet Rauh, Juliane
Despang, Florian
Baas, Jorgen
Liebers, Cornelia
Pruss, Axel
Gelinsky, Michael
Günther, Klaus-Peter
Stiehler, Maik
author_sort Rauh, Juliane
collection PubMed
description Bone transplantation is frequently used for the treatment of large osseous defects. The availability of autologous bone grafts as the current biological gold standard is limited and there is a risk of donor site morbidity. Allogenic bone grafts are an appealing alternative, but disinfection should be considered to reduce transmission of infection disorders. Peracetic acid-ethanol (PE) treatment has been proven reliable and effective for disinfection of human bone allografts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of PE treatment on the biomechanical properties and microstructure of cancellous bone grafts (CBG). Forty-eight human CBG cylinders were either treated by PE or frozen at −20°C and subjected to compression testing and histological and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The levels of compressive strength, stiffness (Young's modulus), and fracture energy were significantly decreased upon PE treatment by 54%, 59%, and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, PE-treated CBG demonstrated a 42% increase in ultimate strain. SEM revealed a modified microstructure of CBG with an exposed collagen fiber network after PE treatment. We conclude that the observed reduced compressive strength and reduced stiffness may be beneficial during tissue remodeling thereby explaining the excellent clinical performance of PE-treated CBG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3942278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39422782014-03-27 Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft Rauh, Juliane Despang, Florian Baas, Jorgen Liebers, Cornelia Pruss, Axel Gelinsky, Michael Günther, Klaus-Peter Stiehler, Maik Biomed Res Int Research Article Bone transplantation is frequently used for the treatment of large osseous defects. The availability of autologous bone grafts as the current biological gold standard is limited and there is a risk of donor site morbidity. Allogenic bone grafts are an appealing alternative, but disinfection should be considered to reduce transmission of infection disorders. Peracetic acid-ethanol (PE) treatment has been proven reliable and effective for disinfection of human bone allografts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of PE treatment on the biomechanical properties and microstructure of cancellous bone grafts (CBG). Forty-eight human CBG cylinders were either treated by PE or frozen at −20°C and subjected to compression testing and histological and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The levels of compressive strength, stiffness (Young's modulus), and fracture energy were significantly decreased upon PE treatment by 54%, 59%, and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, PE-treated CBG demonstrated a 42% increase in ultimate strain. SEM revealed a modified microstructure of CBG with an exposed collagen fiber network after PE treatment. We conclude that the observed reduced compressive strength and reduced stiffness may be beneficial during tissue remodeling thereby explaining the excellent clinical performance of PE-treated CBG. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3942278/ /pubmed/24678514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784702 Text en Copyright © 2014 Juliane Rauh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rauh, Juliane
Despang, Florian
Baas, Jorgen
Liebers, Cornelia
Pruss, Axel
Gelinsky, Michael
Günther, Klaus-Peter
Stiehler, Maik
Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title_full Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title_fullStr Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title_short Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft
title_sort comparative biomechanical and microstructural analysis of native versus peracetic acid-ethanol treated cancellous bone graft
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24678514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/784702
work_keys_str_mv AT rauhjuliane comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT despangflorian comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT baasjorgen comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT lieberscornelia comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT prussaxel comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT gelinskymichael comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT guntherklauspeter comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft
AT stiehlermaik comparativebiomechanicalandmicrostructuralanalysisofnativeversusperaceticacidethanoltreatedcancellousbonegraft