Cargando…
Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therap...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059 |
_version_ | 1782479054464614400 |
---|---|
author | Raffin, Estelle Siebner, Hartwig R. |
author_facet | Raffin, Estelle Siebner, Hartwig R. |
author_sort | Raffin, Estelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therapeutic tool. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent meta-analyses showed that the treatment effects of NIBS in patients with stroke are rather inconsistent across studies and the evidence for therapeutic efficacy is still uncertain. This raises the question of how NIBS can be developed further to improve its therapeutic efficacy. SUMMARY: This review addressed six questions: How does NIBS facilitate the recovery of function after stroke? Which brain regions should be targeted by NIBS? Is there a particularly effective NIBS modality that should be used? Does the location of the stroke influence the therapeutic response? How often should NIBS be repeated? Is the functional state of the brain during or before NIBS relevant to therapeutic efficacy of NIBS? We argue that these questions need to be tackled to obtain sufficient mechanistic understanding of how NIBS facilitates the recovery of function. This knowledge will be critical to fully unfold the therapeutic effects of NIBS and will pave the way towards adaptive NIBS protocols, in which NIBS is tailored to the individual patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3942353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39423532014-03-05 Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke Raffin, Estelle Siebner, Hartwig R. Curr Opin Neurol CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therapeutic tool. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent meta-analyses showed that the treatment effects of NIBS in patients with stroke are rather inconsistent across studies and the evidence for therapeutic efficacy is still uncertain. This raises the question of how NIBS can be developed further to improve its therapeutic efficacy. SUMMARY: This review addressed six questions: How does NIBS facilitate the recovery of function after stroke? Which brain regions should be targeted by NIBS? Is there a particularly effective NIBS modality that should be used? Does the location of the stroke influence the therapeutic response? How often should NIBS be repeated? Is the functional state of the brain during or before NIBS relevant to therapeutic efficacy of NIBS? We argue that these questions need to be tackled to obtain sufficient mechanistic understanding of how NIBS facilitates the recovery of function. This knowledge will be critical to fully unfold the therapeutic effects of NIBS and will pave the way towards adaptive NIBS protocols, in which NIBS is tailored to the individual patient. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014-02 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3942353/ /pubmed/24296641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059 Text en © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson Raffin, Estelle Siebner, Hartwig R. Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title | Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title_full | Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title_fullStr | Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title_short | Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
title_sort | transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke |
topic | CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raffinestelle transcranialbrainstimulationtopromotefunctionalrecoveryafterstroke AT siebnerhartwigr transcranialbrainstimulationtopromotefunctionalrecoveryafterstroke |