Cargando…

Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raffin, Estelle, Siebner, Hartwig R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059
_version_ 1782479054464614400
author Raffin, Estelle
Siebner, Hartwig R.
author_facet Raffin, Estelle
Siebner, Hartwig R.
author_sort Raffin, Estelle
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therapeutic tool. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent meta-analyses showed that the treatment effects of NIBS in patients with stroke are rather inconsistent across studies and the evidence for therapeutic efficacy is still uncertain. This raises the question of how NIBS can be developed further to improve its therapeutic efficacy. SUMMARY: This review addressed six questions: How does NIBS facilitate the recovery of function after stroke? Which brain regions should be targeted by NIBS? Is there a particularly effective NIBS modality that should be used? Does the location of the stroke influence the therapeutic response? How often should NIBS be repeated? Is the functional state of the brain during or before NIBS relevant to therapeutic efficacy of NIBS? We argue that these questions need to be tackled to obtain sufficient mechanistic understanding of how NIBS facilitates the recovery of function. This knowledge will be critical to fully unfold the therapeutic effects of NIBS and will pave the way towards adaptive NIBS protocols, in which NIBS is tailored to the individual patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3942353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39423532014-03-05 Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke Raffin, Estelle Siebner, Hartwig R. Curr Opin Neurol CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therapeutic tool. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent meta-analyses showed that the treatment effects of NIBS in patients with stroke are rather inconsistent across studies and the evidence for therapeutic efficacy is still uncertain. This raises the question of how NIBS can be developed further to improve its therapeutic efficacy. SUMMARY: This review addressed six questions: How does NIBS facilitate the recovery of function after stroke? Which brain regions should be targeted by NIBS? Is there a particularly effective NIBS modality that should be used? Does the location of the stroke influence the therapeutic response? How often should NIBS be repeated? Is the functional state of the brain during or before NIBS relevant to therapeutic efficacy of NIBS? We argue that these questions need to be tackled to obtain sufficient mechanistic understanding of how NIBS facilitates the recovery of function. This knowledge will be critical to fully unfold the therapeutic effects of NIBS and will pave the way towards adaptive NIBS protocols, in which NIBS is tailored to the individual patient. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014-02 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3942353/ /pubmed/24296641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059 Text en © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson
Raffin, Estelle
Siebner, Hartwig R.
Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title_full Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title_fullStr Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title_short Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
title_sort transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke
topic CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE: Edited by Yves Samson
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059
work_keys_str_mv AT raffinestelle transcranialbrainstimulationtopromotefunctionalrecoveryafterstroke
AT siebnerhartwigr transcranialbrainstimulationtopromotefunctionalrecoveryafterstroke