Cargando…

An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit

BACKGROUND: Infection control is a key issue in podiatry as it is in all forms of clinical practice. Airborne contamination may be particularly important in podiatry due to the generation of particulates during treatment. Consequently, technologies that prevent contamination in podiatry settings may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Humphreys, Paul N, Davies, Chris S, Rout, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24576315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-17
_version_ 1782479122377736192
author Humphreys, Paul N
Davies, Chris S
Rout, Simon
author_facet Humphreys, Paul N
Davies, Chris S
Rout, Simon
author_sort Humphreys, Paul N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infection control is a key issue in podiatry as it is in all forms of clinical practice. Airborne contamination may be particularly important in podiatry due to the generation of particulates during treatment. Consequently, technologies that prevent contamination in podiatry settings may have a useful role. The aims of this investigation were twofold, firstly to determine the ability of a UV cabinet to protect instruments from airborne contamination and secondly to determine its ability to remove microbes from contaminated surfaces and instruments. METHOD: A UV instrument cabinet was installed in a University podiatry suite. Impact samplers and standard microbiological techniques were used to determine the nature and extent of microbial airborne contamination. Sterile filters were used to determine the ability of the UV cabinet to protect exposed surfaces. Artificially contaminated instruments were used to determine the ability of the cabinet to remove microbial contamination. RESULTS: Airborne bacterial contamination was dominated by Gram positive cocci including Staphylococcus aureus. Airborne fungal levels were much lower than those observed for bacteria. The UV cabinet significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the observed levels of airborne contamination. When challenged with contaminated instruments the cabinet was able to reduce microbial levels by between 60% to 100% with more complex instruments e.g. clippers, remaining contaminated. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial airborne contamination is a potential infection risk in podiatry settings due to the presence of S. aureus. The use of a UV instrument cabinet can reduce the risk of contamination by airborne microbes. The UV cabinet tested was unable to decontaminate instruments and as such could pose an infection risk if misused.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3942763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39427632014-03-14 An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit Humphreys, Paul N Davies, Chris S Rout, Simon J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Infection control is a key issue in podiatry as it is in all forms of clinical practice. Airborne contamination may be particularly important in podiatry due to the generation of particulates during treatment. Consequently, technologies that prevent contamination in podiatry settings may have a useful role. The aims of this investigation were twofold, firstly to determine the ability of a UV cabinet to protect instruments from airborne contamination and secondly to determine its ability to remove microbes from contaminated surfaces and instruments. METHOD: A UV instrument cabinet was installed in a University podiatry suite. Impact samplers and standard microbiological techniques were used to determine the nature and extent of microbial airborne contamination. Sterile filters were used to determine the ability of the UV cabinet to protect exposed surfaces. Artificially contaminated instruments were used to determine the ability of the cabinet to remove microbial contamination. RESULTS: Airborne bacterial contamination was dominated by Gram positive cocci including Staphylococcus aureus. Airborne fungal levels were much lower than those observed for bacteria. The UV cabinet significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the observed levels of airborne contamination. When challenged with contaminated instruments the cabinet was able to reduce microbial levels by between 60% to 100% with more complex instruments e.g. clippers, remaining contaminated. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial airborne contamination is a potential infection risk in podiatry settings due to the presence of S. aureus. The use of a UV instrument cabinet can reduce the risk of contamination by airborne microbes. The UV cabinet tested was unable to decontaminate instruments and as such could pose an infection risk if misused. BioMed Central 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3942763/ /pubmed/24576315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Humphreys et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Humphreys, Paul N
Davies, Chris S
Rout, Simon
An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title_full An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title_fullStr An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title_short An evaluation of the infection control potential of a UV clinical podiatry unit
title_sort evaluation of the infection control potential of a uv clinical podiatry unit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24576315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-17
work_keys_str_mv AT humphreyspauln anevaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit
AT davieschriss anevaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit
AT routsimon anevaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit
AT humphreyspauln evaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit
AT davieschriss evaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit
AT routsimon evaluationoftheinfectioncontrolpotentialofauvclinicalpodiatryunit