Cargando…

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Drawing conclusions from systematic reviews of test accuracy studies without considering the methodological quality (risk of bias) of included studies may lead to unwarranted optimism about the value of the test(s) under study. We sought to identify to what extent the results of quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ochodo, Eleanor A, van Enst, Wynanda A, Naaktgeboren, Christiana A, de Groot, Joris AH, Hooft, Lotty, Moons, Karel GM, Reitsma, Johannes B, Bossuyt, Patrick M, Leeflang, Mariska MG
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-33

Ejemplares similares

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, Wynanda Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
por: Naaktgeboren, Christiana A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, W Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy for evidence-based diagnostic practice in Africa
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies
por: Naaktgeboren, Christiana A, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: van Enst, Wynanda A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women
por: Kattenberg, Johanna H, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing comparative test accuracy questions
por: Leeflang, Mariska M. G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A generic nomogram for multinomial prediction models: theory and guidance for construction
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
por: Korevaar, Daniël A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Routine laboratory testing to determine if a patient has COVID‐19
por: Stegeman, Inge, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies
por: Vali, Yasaman, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Guidelines for guideline developers: a systematic review of grading systems for medical tests
por: Gopalakrishna, Gowri, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Responsible research: using the right methodology
por: Leeflang, Mariska M.G.
Publicado: (2023)

Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
por: Leeflang, Mariska MG, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
por: Geersing, Geert-Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Correction: Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
por: Geersing, Geert-Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting of test comparisons in diagnostic accuracy studies: A literature review
por: Vali, Yasaman, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and Reporting
por: Bertens, Loes C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19
por: Struyf, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19 disease
por: Struyf, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Defining the clinical pathway in cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
por: Gopalakrishna, G., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prediction models for the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review
por: Lamain – de Ruiter, Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies
por: Leenaars, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_pftnk8grb9m4f0sers94nmclmp