Cargando…

Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Although lateral internal sphincterotomy is the gold-standard treatment for chronic anal fissure, intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin seems to be a reliable new option. The aim of this non-randomized study is to compare the effect of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giral, Adnan, Memişoğlu, Kemal, Gültekin, Yücel, İmeryüz, Neşe, Kalaycı, Cem, Ulusoy, Nefise B, Tözün, Nurdan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC394326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15035674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-4-7
_version_ 1782121313581662208
author Giral, Adnan
Memişoğlu, Kemal
Gültekin, Yücel
İmeryüz, Neşe
Kalaycı, Cem
Ulusoy, Nefise B
Tözün, Nurdan
author_facet Giral, Adnan
Memişoğlu, Kemal
Gültekin, Yücel
İmeryüz, Neşe
Kalaycı, Cem
Ulusoy, Nefise B
Tözün, Nurdan
author_sort Giral, Adnan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although lateral internal sphincterotomy is the gold-standard treatment for chronic anal fissure, intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin seems to be a reliable new option. The aim of this non-randomized study is to compare the effect of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments on the outcome and reduction of anal sphincter pressures in patients with chronic anal fissure. METHODS: Patients with chronic anal fissure were treated with either botulinum toxin injection or lateral internal sphincterotomy by their own choice. Maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure measurements were performed before and 2 weeks after treatments by anal manometry. Patients were followed for fissure relapse during 14 months. RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive outpatients with posterior chronic anal fissure were enrolled. Eleven patients underwent surgery and ten patients received botulinum toxin injection treatment. Before the treatment, anal pressures were found to be similar in both groups. After the treatment, the maximal resting pressures were reduced from 104 ± 22 mmHg to 86 ± 15 mmHg in the surgery group (p < 0.05) and from 101 ± 23 mmHg to 83 ± 24 mmHg in the botulinum toxin group (p < 0.05). The mean maximal squeeze pressures were reduced from 70 ± 27 mmHg to 61 ± 32 mmHg (p > 0.05) in the surgery group, and from 117 ± 62 mmHg to 76 ± 34 (p < 0.01) in the botulinum toxin group. The fissures were healed in 70 percent of patients in the botulinum group and 82 percent in the surgery group (p > 0.05). There were no relapses during the 14 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments both seem to be equally effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
format Text
id pubmed-394326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-3943262004-04-22 Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial Giral, Adnan Memişoğlu, Kemal Gültekin, Yücel İmeryüz, Neşe Kalaycı, Cem Ulusoy, Nefise B Tözün, Nurdan BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although lateral internal sphincterotomy is the gold-standard treatment for chronic anal fissure, intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin seems to be a reliable new option. The aim of this non-randomized study is to compare the effect of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments on the outcome and reduction of anal sphincter pressures in patients with chronic anal fissure. METHODS: Patients with chronic anal fissure were treated with either botulinum toxin injection or lateral internal sphincterotomy by their own choice. Maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure measurements were performed before and 2 weeks after treatments by anal manometry. Patients were followed for fissure relapse during 14 months. RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive outpatients with posterior chronic anal fissure were enrolled. Eleven patients underwent surgery and ten patients received botulinum toxin injection treatment. Before the treatment, anal pressures were found to be similar in both groups. After the treatment, the maximal resting pressures were reduced from 104 ± 22 mmHg to 86 ± 15 mmHg in the surgery group (p < 0.05) and from 101 ± 23 mmHg to 83 ± 24 mmHg in the botulinum toxin group (p < 0.05). The mean maximal squeeze pressures were reduced from 70 ± 27 mmHg to 61 ± 32 mmHg (p > 0.05) in the surgery group, and from 117 ± 62 mmHg to 76 ± 34 (p < 0.01) in the botulinum toxin group. The fissures were healed in 70 percent of patients in the botulinum group and 82 percent in the surgery group (p > 0.05). There were no relapses during the 14 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments both seem to be equally effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. BioMed Central 2004-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC394326/ /pubmed/15035674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2004 Giral et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Giral, Adnan
Memişoğlu, Kemal
Gültekin, Yücel
İmeryüz, Neşe
Kalaycı, Cem
Ulusoy, Nefise B
Tözün, Nurdan
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_full Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_short Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_sort botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a non-randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC394326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15035674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT giraladnan botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT memisoglukemal botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gultekinyucel botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT imeryuznese botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kalaycıcem botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ulusoynefiseb botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tozunnurdan botulinumtoxininjectionversuslateralinternalsphincterotomyinthetreatmentofchronicanalfissureanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial