Cargando…

The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Methamphetamine (MA) dependence is associated with cognitive deficits. Methylphenidate (MPH) has been shown to improve inhibitory control in healthy and cocaine-dependent subjects. This study aimed to understand the neurophysiological effects before and after acute MPH administration in active MA-de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jan, Reem K., Lin, Joanne C., McLaren, Donald G., Kirk, Ian J., Kydd, Rob R., Russell, Bruce R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00020
_version_ 1782306375863369728
author Jan, Reem K.
Lin, Joanne C.
McLaren, Donald G.
Kirk, Ian J.
Kydd, Rob R.
Russell, Bruce R.
author_facet Jan, Reem K.
Lin, Joanne C.
McLaren, Donald G.
Kirk, Ian J.
Kydd, Rob R.
Russell, Bruce R.
author_sort Jan, Reem K.
collection PubMed
description Methamphetamine (MA) dependence is associated with cognitive deficits. Methylphenidate (MPH) has been shown to improve inhibitory control in healthy and cocaine-dependent subjects. This study aimed to understand the neurophysiological effects before and after acute MPH administration in active MA-dependent and control subjects. Fifteen MA-dependent and 18 control subjects aged 18–46 years were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after either a single oral dose of MPH (18 mg) or placebo while performing a color-word Stroop task. Baseline accuracy was lower (p = 0.026) and response time (RT) was longer (p < 0.0001) for the incongruent compared to congruent condition, demonstrating the task probed cognitive control. Increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex during the incongruent and Stroop effect conditions, respectively was observed in MA-dependent compared to control subjects (p < 0.05), suggesting the need to recruit neural resources within these regions for conflict resolution. Post- compared to pre-MPH treatment, increased RT and DLPFC activation for the Stroop effect were observed in MA-dependent subjects (p < 0.05). In comparison to MPH-treated controls and placebo-treated MA-dependent subjects, MPH-treated MA-dependent subjects showed decreased activation of parietal and occipital regions during the incongruent and Stroop effect conditions (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that in MA-dependent subjects, MPH facilitated increased recruitment of the DLPFC for Stroop conflict resolution, and a decreased need for recruitment of neural resources in parietal and occipital regions compared to the other groups, while maintaining a comparable level of task performance to that achieved pre-drug administration. Due to the small sample size, the results from this study are preliminary; however, they inform us about the effects of MPH on the neural correlates of cognitive control in active MA-dependent subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3944404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39444042014-03-17 The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Jan, Reem K. Lin, Joanne C. McLaren, Donald G. Kirk, Ian J. Kydd, Rob R. Russell, Bruce R. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Methamphetamine (MA) dependence is associated with cognitive deficits. Methylphenidate (MPH) has been shown to improve inhibitory control in healthy and cocaine-dependent subjects. This study aimed to understand the neurophysiological effects before and after acute MPH administration in active MA-dependent and control subjects. Fifteen MA-dependent and 18 control subjects aged 18–46 years were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after either a single oral dose of MPH (18 mg) or placebo while performing a color-word Stroop task. Baseline accuracy was lower (p = 0.026) and response time (RT) was longer (p < 0.0001) for the incongruent compared to congruent condition, demonstrating the task probed cognitive control. Increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex during the incongruent and Stroop effect conditions, respectively was observed in MA-dependent compared to control subjects (p < 0.05), suggesting the need to recruit neural resources within these regions for conflict resolution. Post- compared to pre-MPH treatment, increased RT and DLPFC activation for the Stroop effect were observed in MA-dependent subjects (p < 0.05). In comparison to MPH-treated controls and placebo-treated MA-dependent subjects, MPH-treated MA-dependent subjects showed decreased activation of parietal and occipital regions during the incongruent and Stroop effect conditions (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that in MA-dependent subjects, MPH facilitated increased recruitment of the DLPFC for Stroop conflict resolution, and a decreased need for recruitment of neural resources in parietal and occipital regions compared to the other groups, while maintaining a comparable level of task performance to that achieved pre-drug administration. Due to the small sample size, the results from this study are preliminary; however, they inform us about the effects of MPH on the neural correlates of cognitive control in active MA-dependent subjects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3944404/ /pubmed/24639656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00020 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jan, Lin, McLaren, Kirk, Kydd and Russell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Jan, Reem K.
Lin, Joanne C.
McLaren, Donald G.
Kirk, Ian J.
Kydd, Rob R.
Russell, Bruce R.
The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short The Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Control in Active Methamphetamine Dependence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort effects of methylphenidate on cognitive control in active methamphetamine dependence using functional magnetic resonance imaging
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00020
work_keys_str_mv AT janreemk theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT linjoannec theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mclarendonaldg theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kirkianj theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kyddrobr theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT russellbrucer theeffectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT janreemk effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT linjoannec effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mclarendonaldg effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kirkianj effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kyddrobr effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging
AT russellbrucer effectsofmethylphenidateoncognitivecontrolinactivemethamphetaminedependenceusingfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging