Cargando…

Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Postponing delivery for 48 hours with tocolytics to allow for maternal steroid administration and antenatal transportation to a centre with neonatal intensive care unit facilities is the standard treatment for wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Vliet, Elvira OG, Schuit, Ewoud, Heida, Karst Y, Opmeer, Brent C, Kok, Marjolein, Gyselaers, Wilfried, Porath, Martina M, Woiski, Mallory, Bax, Caroline J, Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM, Scheepers, Hubertina CJ, Jaquemyn, Yves, van Beek, Erik, Duvekot, Hans JJ, Franssen, Maureen TM, Bijvank, Bas N, Kok, Joke H, Franx, Arie, Mol, Ben Willem J, Oudijk, Martijn A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-93
_version_ 1782306399650316288
author van Vliet, Elvira OG
Schuit, Ewoud
Heida, Karst Y
Opmeer, Brent C
Kok, Marjolein
Gyselaers, Wilfried
Porath, Martina M
Woiski, Mallory
Bax, Caroline J
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Scheepers, Hubertina CJ
Jaquemyn, Yves
van Beek, Erik
Duvekot, Hans JJ
Franssen, Maureen TM
Bijvank, Bas N
Kok, Joke H
Franx, Arie
Mol, Ben Willem J
Oudijk, Martijn A
author_facet van Vliet, Elvira OG
Schuit, Ewoud
Heida, Karst Y
Opmeer, Brent C
Kok, Marjolein
Gyselaers, Wilfried
Porath, Martina M
Woiski, Mallory
Bax, Caroline J
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Scheepers, Hubertina CJ
Jaquemyn, Yves
van Beek, Erik
Duvekot, Hans JJ
Franssen, Maureen TM
Bijvank, Bas N
Kok, Joke H
Franx, Arie
Mol, Ben Willem J
Oudijk, Martijn A
author_sort van Vliet, Elvira OG
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Postponing delivery for 48 hours with tocolytics to allow for maternal steroid administration and antenatal transportation to a centre with neonatal intensive care unit facilities is the standard treatment for women with threatening preterm delivery in most centres. However, there is controversy as to which tocolytic agent is the drug of first choice. Previous trials have focused on tocolytic efficacy and side effects, and are probably underpowered to detect clinically meaningfull differences in neonatal outcome. Thus, the current evidence is inconclusive to support a balanced recommendation for clinical practice. This multicenter randomised clinical trial aims to compare nifedipine and atosiban in terms of neonatal outcome, duration of pregnancy and maternal side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The Apostel III trial is a nationwide multicenter randomised controlled study. Women with threatened preterm labour (gestational age 25 – 34 weeks) defined as at least 3 contractions per 30 minutes, and 1) a cervical length of ≤ 10 mm or 2) a cervical length of 11-30 mm and a positive Fibronectin test or 3) ruptured membranes will be randomly allocated to treatment with nifedipine or atosiban. Primary outcome is a composite measure of severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be time to delivery, gestational age at delivery, days on ventilation support, neonatal intensive care (NICU) admittance, length admission in neonatal intensive care, total days in hospital until 3 months corrected age, convulsions, apnoea, asphyxia, proven meningitis, pneumothorax, maternal side effects and costs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation of the treatment will be performed. Analysis will be by intention to treat principle. The power calculation is based on an expected 10% difference in the prevalence of adverse neonatal outcome. This implies that 500 women have to be randomised (two sided test, β 0.2 at alpha 0.05). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on the optimal drug of choice in acute tocolysis in threatening preterm labour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration: NTR2947, date of registration: June 20th 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3944539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39445392014-03-07 Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial) van Vliet, Elvira OG Schuit, Ewoud Heida, Karst Y Opmeer, Brent C Kok, Marjolein Gyselaers, Wilfried Porath, Martina M Woiski, Mallory Bax, Caroline J Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Scheepers, Hubertina CJ Jaquemyn, Yves van Beek, Erik Duvekot, Hans JJ Franssen, Maureen TM Bijvank, Bas N Kok, Joke H Franx, Arie Mol, Ben Willem J Oudijk, Martijn A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Postponing delivery for 48 hours with tocolytics to allow for maternal steroid administration and antenatal transportation to a centre with neonatal intensive care unit facilities is the standard treatment for women with threatening preterm delivery in most centres. However, there is controversy as to which tocolytic agent is the drug of first choice. Previous trials have focused on tocolytic efficacy and side effects, and are probably underpowered to detect clinically meaningfull differences in neonatal outcome. Thus, the current evidence is inconclusive to support a balanced recommendation for clinical practice. This multicenter randomised clinical trial aims to compare nifedipine and atosiban in terms of neonatal outcome, duration of pregnancy and maternal side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The Apostel III trial is a nationwide multicenter randomised controlled study. Women with threatened preterm labour (gestational age 25 – 34 weeks) defined as at least 3 contractions per 30 minutes, and 1) a cervical length of ≤ 10 mm or 2) a cervical length of 11-30 mm and a positive Fibronectin test or 3) ruptured membranes will be randomly allocated to treatment with nifedipine or atosiban. Primary outcome is a composite measure of severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be time to delivery, gestational age at delivery, days on ventilation support, neonatal intensive care (NICU) admittance, length admission in neonatal intensive care, total days in hospital until 3 months corrected age, convulsions, apnoea, asphyxia, proven meningitis, pneumothorax, maternal side effects and costs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation of the treatment will be performed. Analysis will be by intention to treat principle. The power calculation is based on an expected 10% difference in the prevalence of adverse neonatal outcome. This implies that 500 women have to be randomised (two sided test, β 0.2 at alpha 0.05). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on the optimal drug of choice in acute tocolysis in threatening preterm labour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration: NTR2947, date of registration: June 20th 2011. BioMed Central 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3944539/ /pubmed/24589124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-93 Text en Copyright © 2014 van Vliet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Vliet, Elvira OG
Schuit, Ewoud
Heida, Karst Y
Opmeer, Brent C
Kok, Marjolein
Gyselaers, Wilfried
Porath, Martina M
Woiski, Mallory
Bax, Caroline J
Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM
Scheepers, Hubertina CJ
Jaquemyn, Yves
van Beek, Erik
Duvekot, Hans JJ
Franssen, Maureen TM
Bijvank, Bas N
Kok, Joke H
Franx, Arie
Mol, Ben Willem J
Oudijk, Martijn A
Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title_full Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title_fullStr Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title_full_unstemmed Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title_short Nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (Assessment of Perinatal Outcome after Specific Tocolysis in Early Labour: APOSTEL III-Trial)
title_sort nifedipine versus atosiban in the treatment of threatened preterm labour (assessment of perinatal outcome after specific tocolysis in early labour: apostel iii-trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-93
work_keys_str_mv AT vanvlietelviraog nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT schuitewoud nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT heidakarsty nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT opmeerbrentc nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT kokmarjolein nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT gyselaerswilfried nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT porathmartinam nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT woiskimallory nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT baxcarolinej nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT bloemenkampkittywm nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT scheepershubertinacj nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT jaquemynyves nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT vanbeekerik nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT duvekothansjj nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT franssenmaureentm nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT bijvankbasn nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT kokjokeh nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT franxarie nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT molbenwillemj nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial
AT oudijkmartijna nifedipineversusatosibaninthetreatmentofthreatenedpretermlabourassessmentofperinataloutcomeafterspecifictocolysisinearlylabouraposteliiitrial