Cargando…

DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between biomechanical variables and running economy in North African and European runners. Eight North African and 13 European male runners of the same athletic level ran 4-minute stages on a treadmill at varying set velocities. During th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos-Concejero, J., Granados, C., Irazusta, J., Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I., Zabala-Lili, J., Tam, N., Gil, S.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1059170
_version_ 1782306405085085696
author Santos-Concejero, J.
Granados, C.
Irazusta, J.
Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I.
Zabala-Lili, J.
Tam, N.
Gil, S.M.
author_facet Santos-Concejero, J.
Granados, C.
Irazusta, J.
Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I.
Zabala-Lili, J.
Tam, N.
Gil, S.M.
author_sort Santos-Concejero, J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between biomechanical variables and running economy in North African and European runners. Eight North African and 13 European male runners of the same athletic level ran 4-minute stages on a treadmill at varying set velocities. During the test, biomechanical variables such as ground contact time, swing time, stride length, stride frequency, stride angle and the different sub-phases of ground contact were recorded using an optical measurement system. Additionally, oxygen uptake was measured to calculate running economy. The European runners were more economical than the North African runners at 19.5 km · h(−1), presented lower ground contact time at 18 km · h(−1) and 19.5 km · h(−1) and experienced later propulsion sub-phase at 10.5 km · h(−1),12 km · h(−1), 15 km · h(−1), 16.5 km · h(−1) and 19.5 km · h(−1) than the European runners (P < 0.05). Running economy at 19.5 km · h(−1) was negatively correlated with swing time (r = -0.53) and stride angle (r = -0.52), whereas it was positively correlated with ground contact time (r = 0.53). Within the constraints of extrapolating these findings, the less efficient running economy in North African runners may imply that their outstanding performance at international athletic events appears not to be linked to running efficiency. Further, the differences in metabolic demand seem to be associated with differing biomechanical characteristics during ground contact, including longer contact times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3944563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39445632014-04-17 DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS Santos-Concejero, J. Granados, C. Irazusta, J. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I. Zabala-Lili, J. Tam, N. Gil, S.M. Biol Sport Original Paper The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between biomechanical variables and running economy in North African and European runners. Eight North African and 13 European male runners of the same athletic level ran 4-minute stages on a treadmill at varying set velocities. During the test, biomechanical variables such as ground contact time, swing time, stride length, stride frequency, stride angle and the different sub-phases of ground contact were recorded using an optical measurement system. Additionally, oxygen uptake was measured to calculate running economy. The European runners were more economical than the North African runners at 19.5 km · h(−1), presented lower ground contact time at 18 km · h(−1) and 19.5 km · h(−1) and experienced later propulsion sub-phase at 10.5 km · h(−1),12 km · h(−1), 15 km · h(−1), 16.5 km · h(−1) and 19.5 km · h(−1) than the European runners (P < 0.05). Running economy at 19.5 km · h(−1) was negatively correlated with swing time (r = -0.53) and stride angle (r = -0.52), whereas it was positively correlated with ground contact time (r = 0.53). Within the constraints of extrapolating these findings, the less efficient running economy in North African runners may imply that their outstanding performance at international athletic events appears not to be linked to running efficiency. Further, the differences in metabolic demand seem to be associated with differing biomechanical characteristics during ground contact, including longer contact times. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2013-07-22 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3944563/ /pubmed/24744486 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1059170 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Santos-Concejero, J.
Granados, C.
Irazusta, J.
Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I.
Zabala-Lili, J.
Tam, N.
Gil, S.M.
DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title_full DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title_fullStr DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title_full_unstemmed DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title_short DIFFERENCES IN GROUND CONTACT TIME EXPLAIN THE LESS EFFICIENT RUNNING ECONOMY IN NORTH AFRICAN RUNNERS
title_sort differences in ground contact time explain the less efficient running economy in north african runners
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744486
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1059170
work_keys_str_mv AT santosconcejeroj differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT granadosc differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT irazustaj differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT bidaurrazagaletonai differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT zabalalilij differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT tamn differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners
AT gilsm differencesingroundcontacttimeexplainthelessefficientrunningeconomyinnorthafricanrunners