Cargando…

Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Training increases the functional use of an upper limb prosthesis, but little is known about how people learn to use their prosthesis. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in performance with an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis during practice. The results provide a basis t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouwsema, Hanneke, van der Sluis, Corry K, Bongers, Raoul M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-16
_version_ 1782306433777270784
author Bouwsema, Hanneke
van der Sluis, Corry K
Bongers, Raoul M
author_facet Bouwsema, Hanneke
van der Sluis, Corry K
Bongers, Raoul M
author_sort Bouwsema, Hanneke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training increases the functional use of an upper limb prosthesis, but little is known about how people learn to use their prosthesis. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in performance with an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis during practice. The results provide a basis to develop an evidence-based training program. METHODS: Thirty-one able-bodied participants took part in an experiment as well as thirty-one age- and gender-matched controls. Participants in the experimental condition, randomly assigned to one of four groups, practiced with a myoelectric simulator for five sessions in a two-weeks period. Group 1 practiced direct grasping, Group 2 practiced indirect grasping, Group 3 practiced fixating, and Group 4 practiced a combination of all three tasks. The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) was assessed in a pretest, posttest, and two retention tests. Participants in the control condition performed SHAP two times, two weeks apart with no practice in between. Compressible objects were used in the grasping tasks. Changes in end-point kinematics, joint angles, and grip force control, the latter measured by magnitude of object compression, were examined. RESULTS: The experimental groups improved more on SHAP than the control group. Interestingly, the fixation group improved comparable to the other training groups on the SHAP. Improvement in global position of the prosthesis leveled off after three practice sessions, whereas learning to control grip force required more time. The indirect grasping group had the smallest object compression in the beginning and this did not change over time, whereas the direct grasping and the combination group had a decrease in compression over time. Moreover, the indirect grasping group had the smallest grasping time that did not vary over object rigidity, while for the other two groups the grasping time decreased with an increase in object rigidity. CONCLUSIONS: A training program should spend more time on learning fine control aspects of the prosthetic hand during rehabilitation. Moreover, training should start with the indirect grasping task that has the best performance, which is probably due to the higher amount of useful information available from the sound hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3944783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39447832014-03-07 Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis Bouwsema, Hanneke van der Sluis, Corry K Bongers, Raoul M J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Training increases the functional use of an upper limb prosthesis, but little is known about how people learn to use their prosthesis. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in performance with an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis during practice. The results provide a basis to develop an evidence-based training program. METHODS: Thirty-one able-bodied participants took part in an experiment as well as thirty-one age- and gender-matched controls. Participants in the experimental condition, randomly assigned to one of four groups, practiced with a myoelectric simulator for five sessions in a two-weeks period. Group 1 practiced direct grasping, Group 2 practiced indirect grasping, Group 3 practiced fixating, and Group 4 practiced a combination of all three tasks. The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) was assessed in a pretest, posttest, and two retention tests. Participants in the control condition performed SHAP two times, two weeks apart with no practice in between. Compressible objects were used in the grasping tasks. Changes in end-point kinematics, joint angles, and grip force control, the latter measured by magnitude of object compression, were examined. RESULTS: The experimental groups improved more on SHAP than the control group. Interestingly, the fixation group improved comparable to the other training groups on the SHAP. Improvement in global position of the prosthesis leveled off after three practice sessions, whereas learning to control grip force required more time. The indirect grasping group had the smallest object compression in the beginning and this did not change over time, whereas the direct grasping and the combination group had a decrease in compression over time. Moreover, the indirect grasping group had the smallest grasping time that did not vary over object rigidity, while for the other two groups the grasping time decreased with an increase in object rigidity. CONCLUSIONS: A training program should spend more time on learning fine control aspects of the prosthetic hand during rehabilitation. Moreover, training should start with the indirect grasping task that has the best performance, which is probably due to the higher amount of useful information available from the sound hand. BioMed Central 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3944783/ /pubmed/24568148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bouwsema et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Bouwsema, Hanneke
van der Sluis, Corry K
Bongers, Raoul M
Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title_fullStr Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title_short Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
title_sort changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3944783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-16
work_keys_str_mv AT bouwsemahanneke changesinperformanceovertimewhilelearningtouseamyoelectricprosthesis
AT vandersluiscorryk changesinperformanceovertimewhilelearningtouseamyoelectricprosthesis
AT bongersraoulm changesinperformanceovertimewhilelearningtouseamyoelectricprosthesis